General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

New ranger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2009
  #1  
newschoolpickup's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Astoria, OR
New ranger

iam looking for a ranger and have found three near me.
One is a 2001 ext. cab 4.0 auto with 103k it has a salvage title but the door was replaced.
another is a 1999 ext. cab with a 3.0 5 speed with 175k on it and i think it has a body lift.
And the last is a 1998 3.0 5 speed with 120k on it.

i dont know a whole lot about rangers and how long they last but i want something reliable until i hopefully do a 4bt conversion to it. here are links too two of them

http://portland.craigslist.org/clk/ctd/1159093325.html

http://portland.craigslist.org/clk/cto/1159396150.html
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #2  
rangerboy101's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,187
Likes: 3
From: Winchester, Va
Personally I would go with the 01. 103k on that motor is really nothing as long as it wasnt abused or anything.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #3  
TrePaul86's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 3
From: Gresham, OR
What's your price range man?

I would honestly buy yourself a 01+ with manual trans. Much better IMO...

I searched for the right truck for about 3 months before finding mine.... And still fell short. So I built it up with exactly how I wanted it... More expensive but can be done!

Welcome to the site man! Glad to see another OR member joining up!
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #4  
Rangerguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 2
From: California
Welcome aboard! Nuthin wrong with an '01!
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #5  
Sea-Bass's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
You got picks of the 01??

I wouldnt want that 98...looks like @ss, plus no a/c.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #6  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
personally i would get a 1998-2000 i like the 2nd one would love to have a 4x4 3.0L manual.. dont tell justin lol... reg cab tho
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #7  
Jimmeh's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 1
From: Columbia Falls, MT
Personally, I could never buy a used vehicle with over 100K on the clock again.

I would keep looking.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #8  
99MazdaB4000's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
From: Kutztown, PA
Keep looking brotha.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #9  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
98-00 ftw lol
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009
  #10  
crazymikey's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 8
From: your mom
I'd go with the 4.0.

Very reliable motors if taken care of. My 02 has 260 000 miles on it. Never even had the check engine light come on in it's life. I don't know much about the auto transmissions, but the manuals are known for slave cylinder problems. I'm on my 2nd clutch and 3rd slave cylinder.

Overall, no matter what Ranger you buy, it'll be a good truck, but you hear lots of complaints on here about the 3.0's being gutless and some problems with them. The 4.0 has decent power, but it's got almost V8 fuel consumption. You'll generally see 16-21mpg from it.

I wouldnt be afraid to buy it with 100k on the clock, it's still got lots of life left. Just make sure it's got a documented service history.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009
  #11  
whisky's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 265
Likes: 1
From: Lincoln,Nebraska
Damm..... 260K my 01 only has 38K on it.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009
  #12  
Machine090767's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
38k means it has been driven only 4,700+ miles each year? damn. thats around 390 miles each month ! and i thought my '01 had low mileage at 70,000 miles!
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009
  #13  
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
Originally Posted by whisky
Damm..... 260K my 01 only has 38K on it.
dang, ive already put 37k on my 07

back to the original question, id go with the 4.0
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009
  #14  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Go with the 4.0
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009
  #15  
1ATony's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Pepperell,Mass
I'd probably go for the 01 too
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chevyslayer925
Member Introductions
22
Jan 27, 2017 07:09 AM
mcd58
General Ford Ranger Discussion
10
Jan 23, 2012 11:24 PM
talon63
Member Introductions
13
Jul 7, 2008 10:11 AM
Topgun588
General Ford Ranger Discussion
14
May 26, 2007 09:03 PM
TDevil
General Ford Ranger Discussion
10
Apr 28, 2005 10:32 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.