Member Introductions New to Ranger-Forums.com? Please take a moment and introduce yourself.

want to install a big block in my splash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2010
  #1  
momstruck's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: windsor ontario canada
want to install a big block in my splash

Does anyone out there know if there are any readily available kits to install a big block in my 97 spash? if so then please tell me. thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010
  #2  
darangerdanger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 1
From: scappoose.oregon
wrong area brah
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010
  #3  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
V-8 tech, but your looking at an outrageous project. Stick with small block.....big block is overkill
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010
  #4  
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Scottdale,PA
^^ x2 big block = heavy low rpm but high torque, small block = light weight super high rpm=wheel speed & u can make up ur torque in gears, i like my stroked small blocks :)
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #5  
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 5
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Welcome to RF killer.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #6  
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
Ford does not categorize its engines using the big/small block nomenclature. Rather, Ford literature distinguishes engine by its series, or family.
That being said. you need to be more specific than "big block" on which motor you are wanting to install 462? 460? 430? 429? 428? 427? 410? 406? 400? 390? 383? 360? 352? 351M?
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #7  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
^True, If your really serious about doing something this big, then drop a Boss 429 SCJ, literally the baddest motor Ford ever built way back when. My uncle has 1 of very few sitting in his garage....probably never to be used
Just saying it would be a awesome idea if you could get ahold of one.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #8  
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
I dont think his mom will be pleased with him attempting to install a Boss 429 in her ranger, clearance issues is an understatement
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #9  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by Toreador4x4
I dont think his mom will be pleased with him attempting to install a Boss 429 in her ranger, clearance issues is an understatement
haha, she would spank his *** all up and down the street for doing it
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #10  
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Scottdale,PA
lmao zach, ya i agree a with u guys, & ford does have a screwed up motor size family, small, medium & large. im a ford guy all the way always have been always will be.
 

Last edited by stangdroptop351; Dec 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #11  
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Scottdale,PA
lol i think he ota put a blown 427 side oiler in it
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010
  #12  
Machine090767's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
welcome to R-F, Dave!
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #13  
My91Ranger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 5
From: Roseville, Michigan
There is a guy who was on this site at one time by the name SuperSplash who had a regular cab splash with a built 460 in it. Was a pretty bad *** little truck. Might still be able to find some info on his build if you search.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #14  
Rooks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
www.BigBlockRanger.com
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #15  
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Scottdale,PA
The Ranger and Bronco II V8 Engine Conversion
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #16  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
466 cubic inches is entirely way to much in Ranger, no point. You don't need that much low end torque. I would rather build a 351 stroker than waste the time on a big block, chances are with all the high end torque the small block has a better shot against a big block any day in the long run. Just my opinion.\

BTW....i'm a Ford guy and always will be, but I love my dodges for one reason and that's for Cummins diesel, if Ford had Cummins then F... Dodge. lol
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #17  
stangdroptop351's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Scottdale,PA
^^ x2 take a 351w & make a 427 stroker out of it balance & blue print it very very very high rpm
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010
  #18  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by stangdroptop351
^^ x2 take a 351w & make a 427 stroker out of it balance & blue print it very very very high rpm
That works for me too, lol. I will pick a 351 over any motor besides a 429 SCJ, but those are impossible to get ahold of, unless your me!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TerryD
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
5
Sep 14, 2015 04:37 PM
knightmare1015
8-Cylinder Tech
10
Dec 30, 2010 01:39 PM
B-Dunk88
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
29
Apr 3, 2009 09:26 AM
ford rules
General Ford Ranger Discussion
19
Dec 13, 2008 11:40 AM
rngrmn9
8-Cylinder Tech
9
Jun 15, 2008 01:40 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.