New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.

I want it LOUD!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #26  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
It doesn't even have to be a knock-off. Look up the MAC Flowpath mufflers -The interior baffling if quite a bit different than Flowmaster and most say they sound better than the 40 series. I also think they are available in SS, something Flowmaster is not good about.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #27  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
I say he wants it loud then run nothing. No manifold or anything. You will be the coolest guy on the street.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #28  
CBFranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay Area
Originally Posted by fddriver02
I say he wants it loud then run nothing. No manifold or anything. You will be the coolest guy on the street.
Till he melts all of the wiring under the hood and the truck catches on fire.

DOOOOO EEEETTT!

XD
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #29  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by CBFranger
Till he melts all of the wiring under the hood and the truck catches on fire.

DOOOOO EEEETTT!

XD
Hey. The louder you are the cooler your are right?

Also everyone will be jealous that the flames on your hood are realistic looking.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #30  
CBFranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay Area
Originally Posted by fddriver02
Hey. The louder you are the cooler your are right?

Also everyone will be jealous that the flames on your hood are realistic looking.
I'm down. Prolly gonna pick up madd performance too. Our exhaust wont be low restriction, it will be NO restriction.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #31  
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: wher ever uncle sam wants
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
It doesn't even have to be a knock-off. Look up the MAC Flowpath mufflers -The interior baffling if quite a bit different than Flowmaster and most say they sound better than the 40 series. I also think they are available in SS, something Flowmaster is not good about.
+1 on MAC, my friend had flow****ters on his mustang then switched to MACs and DAMN, such a beautiful sound echoed from the shop when we fired it up haha
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #32  
DangaRanger99's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, NH
Magnaflow, Flowmaster, Borla or Vortex (made by cherry bomb) sound good...
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #33  
leadfoot's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: MA
If you want it loud then run a hood stack and you might as well throw on some flame injectors while youre at it.

I have a new Bassani exhaust but havent put it on yet. Looking at the inside of the muffler it is a double flow through design.

Name:  IMG_0014.jpg
Views: 51
Size:  20.6 KB

Name:  IMG_0016.jpg
Views: 58
Size:  33.6 KB
 

Last edited by leadfoot; Jun 4, 2008 at 02:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #34  
JakeH05's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Elberton, GA
Which would sound better with duals? super 44 or super 40 maybe remove one cat
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #35  
Boomdock's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Washington, IA
Originally Posted by CBFranger
I dont know about any of the new florwmasters but the original ones were a maze of baffles and turns the exhaust gasses had to pass through. They flowed better than almost any OEM muffler and had a good sound to them but there were/are plenty of other mufflers that flowed better.
X2. Flowmaster may sound good, but they're horrible for performance. Many see a lose of torque after just swapping mufflers (F150 site I'm on). Just how "free flowing" are they with their baffles that your exhaust has to work its way through. It's like a mouse trying to find its way through a maze to the cheese... Sort of. Any straight through muffler (Magnaflow, Dynomax Bullet, Borla, Corsa, ect.) will out perform it on the dyno.

It you want just sound, sure go with a Flowmaster, but if you want some performance as well... Hop off the bandwagon and go with something else.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #36  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Boomdock
X2. Flowmaster may sound good, but they're horrible for performance. Many see a lose of torque after just swapping mufflers (F150 site I'm on). Just how "free flowing" are they with their baffles that your exhaust has to work its way through. It's like a mouse trying to find its way through a maze to the cheese... Sort of. Any straight through muffler (Magnaflow, Dynomax Bullet, Borla, Corsa, ect.) will out perform it on the dyno.

It you want just sound, sure go with a Flowmaster, but if you want some performance as well... Hop off the bandwagon and go with something else.

lol, its funny how mis-information can be distributed... IF ANYTHING a restrictive exhaust will produce more back pressure (to a point) which in turn will produce more torque (to a point)

Think about it..

If you removed all 4 cats from a ranger it would be doggy in the low end because you free'd up too much restriction. Imagine if you bought the truck with no cats and decided to install the 4 cats again, it would seem much more peppy in the low end range.

So if a chambered muffler is "restrictive" it shouldnt have the "low-end loss". If anything, it is more free flowing than the OEM muffler, but not as free flowing as a straight through muffler.

Now im not saying a straight through muffler will net a "low-end loss", but theoretically it shouldnt really put as much of a gain in the low end as it would in the top end RPM Range.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008
  #37  
99MazdaB4000's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
From: Kutztown, PA
gibson
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008
  #38  
Thorny073's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: California, Ky
For now i think i'm just gonna go with the muff i have now...see how it sounds...and save up for somethin else in the future
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008
  #39  
08XLT4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 2
From: bomba shack
Loud is annoying. Get a Magnaflow or Borla. Those sound really good without giving you a headache from the resonation
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008
  #40  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
go to this website: www.holley.com and click on the flowtech logo and click terminator mufflers. go with a single 3 inch inlet and dual 2.5 inch outlets muffler and install 6 inches behind cab with no tips or nothing. It will sound like an earthquake inside the cab with the windows up and set off FACTORY INSTALLED CAR ALARMS on certain makes and models. In fact with with the 4.0 it will sound even better. Mine is a 3.0 and it sounded like Paul Jr's green and black web bike off american chopper when I let off the gas. It will sound even better on a 4.0.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008
  #41  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Originally Posted by 08XLT4x4
Loud is annoying. Get a Magnaflow or Borla. Those sound really good without giving you a headache from the resonation
He'll learn with that muffler I just listed. I only changed it because I got tired of being deaf for an hour after I shut the motor off.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2008
  #42  
Boomdock's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Washington, IA
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
lol, its funny how mis-information can be distributed... IF ANYTHING a restrictive exhaust will produce more back pressure (to a point) which in turn will produce more torque (to a point)
LMFAO! It is quite funny.





It has nothing to do with backpressure.

The lose of torque when people install Slowmasters is from a decrease in exhaust gas velocity.

In a good exhaust system, you want as little backpressure as possible with as high exhaust gas velocity as possible. Too many people think there is a connection between performance and backpressure, there is none.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2008
  #43  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
From what I have heard on this site (video's and comments) Borla's are not that loud. Magnaflow is decent, and flowmaster is going to be by far the loudest of the three mufflers.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008
  #44  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Of those three yes. That terminator muffler I had was way louder and deepr than even flowmaster's Super 40 muffler.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008
  #45  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Boomdock
LMFAO! It is quite funny.





It has nothing to do with backpressure.

The lose of torque when people install Slowmasters is from a decrease in exhaust gas velocity.

In a good exhaust system, you want as little backpressure as possible with as high exhaust gas velocity as possible. Too many people think there is a connection between performance and backpressure, there is none.
How can you have a decrease in exhaust gas velocity when you go from a stock muffler to a (2) chambered muffler?

Also, did you read what i wrote about the Cats...?
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008
  #46  
mhughes165's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 1
From: Browns Mills, NJ
Originally Posted by Thorny073
For now i think i'm just gonna go with the muff i have now...see how it sounds...and save up for somethin else in the future
run the hooker u got, they actually sound REALLY good, ive run them on many different trucks....
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008
  #47  
Boomdock's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Washington, IA
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
How can you have a decrease in exhaust gas velocity when you go from a stock muffler to a (2) chambered muffler?

Also, did you read what i wrote about the Cats...?
Because your exhaust now has work/push it's way around and through those baffles, it lowers the exhaust gas velocity. Your muffler now becomes the "bottleneck" of the system.

Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
If you removed all 4 cats from a ranger it would be doggy in the low end because you free'd up too much restriction. Imagine if you bought the truck with no cats and decided to install the 4 cats again, it would seem much more peppy in the low end range.
Great example. Sorry I missed that.

Cutting all 4 cats and replacing them with straight pipes would remove a lot of restriction/backpressure. However, your exhaust gases have also lowered substantially. At this point you have very little backpressure and very low exhaust gas velcities. To remedy this, the exhaust pipe diameter would have to decrease a lot to bring up the exhaust gas velocities (and you'd also keep the low backpressure you had before).
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008
  #48  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Boomdock
Because your exhaust now has work/push it's way around and through those baffles, it lowers the exhaust gas velocity. Your muffler now becomes the "bottleneck" of the system.

Great example. Sorry I missed that.

Cutting all 4 cats and replacing them with straight pipes would remove a lot of restriction/backpressure. However, your exhaust gases have also lowered substantially. At this point you have very little backpressure and very low exhaust gas velcities. To remedy this, the exhaust pipe diameter would have to decrease a lot to bring up the exhaust gas velocities (and you'd also keep the low backpressure you had before).
Well what i am saying is the OEM mufflers do have chambers and baffles of sorts - If you replace it with a 2-chambered or even a 3 chambered it should "out-flow" the OEM muffler and net a gain, not a loss.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008
  #49  
hittheball's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Apex
A buddy of mine has the exact truck you have with true dual empty glass packs, it dosn't pop at all and sounds like hes got a bigger engine than he really does. My flowmaster sounds really good, but i rep that 3.0
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B-Dunk88
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
29
Apr 3, 2009 09:26 AM
puntadigital
General Ford Ranger Discussion
14
Nov 27, 2007 10:35 AM
invidregent99
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
28
Mar 27, 2007 11:47 PM
TommyC
General Ford Ranger Discussion
11
Aug 1, 2006 03:53 PM
Jardo87
Ranger-Forums Office
35
Jul 3, 2005 04:46 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.