New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.

Sloped body lift

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #1  
95offroadx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: palmyra, pa
Sloped body lift

OK i have seen it done on explorers but never a ranger...a sloped body lift is like 3" body lift in the front and a 2" in the rear. It starts out at 3" then works its way done to 2". Theres like 10 mounts right? 5 on each side?

so its be like 3"-2.75"-2.5"-2.25"-2" for the punk hieghts

would it work?

Im tryin to get a 5"-6" of lift.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #2  
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Thats stupid! (sorry) Why not just put like a 1 inch block or 2 inch block in the rear?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #3  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
If I were to do anything to a beater mud truck, it would be a "double body lift". It'd be 6".

I wouldn't do a sloped body lift, it will throw off your angle of your fan to your radiator (fan is engine mounted, radiator is body mounted) and I couldn't immagine...WHY?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #4  
Blackhawk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: WI
why not just do 3" all around?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #5  
Naturally Aspirated's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 2
From: Roy, Utah
why would you do that?
please don't tell me it's because it's "cool"
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #6  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
you have to be kidding right..
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #7  
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 1
From: Lewiston, Maine
I can understand why the guy did it on his explorer, but I dont think it would would on a ranger


each part of the ranger has 6 cab mounts, where as the explorer is one body. I dont think the cab and bed would like the slope like the explorer worked out.

The explorer guy did his so his front would match the SOA in the rear. Rangers dont need a SOA conversion, and unless you plan to crank the crap out of the tbars, a ranger will sit even with a 3inch body lift, cranked bars, and a shackle (and stock blocks).
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #8  
k.blakeley's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 0
From: East Texas
Ive never heard of this.....anyone have pics?
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #9  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
Originally Posted by k.blakeley
Ive never heard of this.....anyone have pics?
personally i never thought some one would ever do this either

its like constant stress on the bolts just sitting still because the weight of the truck is all cantered to from the frame... idk just doesnt make sense.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #10  
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 1
From: Lewiston, Maine
im trying to find linkable pics, hes on explorerforums, and only members can see the upload pics


heres a drawing of the idea
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #11  
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 1
From: Lewiston, Maine
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...ghlight=sloped


thats the post for anyone interested


theres no pics of the pucks installed


and the exterior pics after the sloped lift just show a level explorer
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #12  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
why not level the front end... or lift.. i dont get it still
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #13  
ChrisR1S's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 263
Likes: 2
From: Kenbridge, VA
ME NEITHER....it owuldnt even look right, nothing would be straight..your body lines would be literally crooked....that would probably feel kinda crazy to sit in
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #14  
RangerExtreme's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Robinson, Pa
...whyy would u ever wanna do that....on a Ranger when u could just do the 1 inch or the 3...just superlift it
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008
  #15  
95offroadx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: palmyra, pa
Reason, im tryin to keep or gain all the susp travel i can. which with the t bars is limited

So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
 

Last edited by 95offroadx; Mar 27, 2008 at 09:59 AM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #16  
Rangerchick760's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos, CA
Seems like the people that do this do it so their truck looks like a baja truck but the baja ones are higher in the front for a reason. and it's not to look cool..... that's just my two cents
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #17  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
i've seen it on a YJ, for some reason he had a body lift in the back and not front.. thats long since gone though
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #18  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
dumbest idea ever. I dont care if anyone else has done it. also who suggested the 6 inch body lift, even more retarded.

so youve heard it a few times now, STUPID idea. ghetto as hell.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #19  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should be done.

Just because someone else did it, doesn't mean it's a good idea.

Wait...I hear the voices in my head, talking in my mother's voice saying...

IF YOUR FRIENDS JUMPED OFF A BRIDGE DOES THAT MEAN YOU'D HAVE TO DO IT TOO?...
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #20  
mazda98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 1
From: dalton,ga.
i would not do it
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #21  
Naturally Aspirated's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 2
From: Roy, Utah
Originally Posted by n3elz
Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should be done.

Just because someone else did it, doesn't mean it's a good idea.

Wait...I hear the voices in my head, talking in my mother's voice saying...

IF YOUR FRIENDS JUMPED OFF A BRIDGE DOES THAT MEAN YOU'D HAVE TO DO IT TOO?...
"if i told you to stick your weiner in a light socket would you do that too?" -Daniel Stern (Bushwhacked)
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008
  #22  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
i've got an idea.. how about you do it..


i think its a grand idea for our entertainment
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2008
  #23  
jamesxEDGE's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Woodland Hills, California
Dgaaaaaaaaaaaaaafffffffffffff
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2008
  #24  
schatten789's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: Matagorda County, Texas
Originally Posted by 95offroadx
Reason, im tryin to keep or gain all the susp travel i can. which with the t bars is limited

So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
By slight tt I am thinking you mean you cranked your torsion bars slightly. Why dont you crank them more if they are only slightly cranked now? That would help level the truck out.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2008
  #25  
BLOODBANE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
From: Canon City, CO
What I don't understand is why the SOA in the rear and no work to the front? Like was said before, crank the torsion bars, new springs of same lift for the rear, and straight BL all the way through. It will sit level then. Don't ghetto lift your rig. You will just be asking for problems.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM.