Sloped body lift
#1
Sloped body lift
OK i have seen it done on explorers but never a ranger...a sloped body lift is like 3" body lift in the front and a 2" in the rear. It starts out at 3" then works its way done to 2". Theres like 10 mounts right? 5 on each side?
so its be like 3"-2.75"-2.5"-2.25"-2" for the punk hieghts
would it work?
Im tryin to get a 5"-6" of lift.
so its be like 3"-2.75"-2.5"-2.25"-2" for the punk hieghts
would it work?
Im tryin to get a 5"-6" of lift.
#3
#7
I can understand why the guy did it on his explorer, but I dont think it would would on a ranger
each part of the ranger has 6 cab mounts, where as the explorer is one body. I dont think the cab and bed would like the slope like the explorer worked out.
The explorer guy did his so his front would match the SOA in the rear. Rangers dont need a SOA conversion, and unless you plan to crank the crap out of the tbars, a ranger will sit even with a 3inch body lift, cranked bars, and a shackle (and stock blocks).
each part of the ranger has 6 cab mounts, where as the explorer is one body. I dont think the cab and bed would like the slope like the explorer worked out.
The explorer guy did his so his front would match the SOA in the rear. Rangers dont need a SOA conversion, and unless you plan to crank the crap out of the tbars, a ranger will sit even with a 3inch body lift, cranked bars, and a shackle (and stock blocks).
#9
personally i never thought some one would ever do this either
its like constant stress on the bolts just sitting still because the weight of the truck is all cantered to from the frame... idk just doesnt make sense.
its like constant stress on the bolts just sitting still because the weight of the truck is all cantered to from the frame... idk just doesnt make sense.
#11
http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...ghlight=sloped
thats the post for anyone interested
theres no pics of the pucks installed
and the exterior pics after the sloped lift just show a level explorer
thats the post for anyone interested
theres no pics of the pucks installed
and the exterior pics after the sloped lift just show a level explorer
#15
Reason, im tryin to keep or gain all the susp travel i can. which with the t bars is limited
So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
Last edited by 95offroadx; 03-27-2008 at 09:59 AM.
#16
#18
#19
#21
Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should be done.
Just because someone else did it, doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Wait...I hear the voices in my head, talking in my mother's voice saying...
IF YOUR FRIENDS JUMPED OFF A BRIDGE DOES THAT MEAN YOU'D HAVE TO DO IT TOO?...
Just because someone else did it, doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Wait...I hear the voices in my head, talking in my mother's voice saying...
IF YOUR FRIENDS JUMPED OFF A BRIDGE DOES THAT MEAN YOU'D HAVE TO DO IT TOO?...
#24
Reason, im tryin to keep or gain all the susp travel i can. which with the t bars is limited
So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
So with 1 rated bars, and a slight tt(very slight) 2" lift. I have 6" skyjacker leaf springs, they settle down to like 5" of lift, remove the stock block. Its still 3" over stock. Id rather have a level truck then raked out one
#25