Oil & Lubrication General discussion of motor oil and lubrication products and analysis.

05/20 forNorthern California 4.0 1993 Ranger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-05-2017
warmblood58's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05/20 forNorthern California 4.0 1993 Ranger

My understanding is that 05/20 is the spec by the Feds for fuel mileage for the 4.0 engine (1993). My new to me 4x4 ranger just turned 130,00o miles, should I switch to a Mobile One product, 0/30 or other or just stay with Dino 05/20. Our temps get down into the 20's here in the winters and summers are high 90's and low 100's at times. Any thoughts? Thanks!

James
 
  #2  
Old 11-06-2017
Tsquare's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: xxx
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Use the oil weight recommended.

If you know the service history and it has been serviced with dino up to 130k I would not switch it over to synthetic. Synthetic is better oil but if you swap over you may have dino varnish that is plugging up some leaky gaskets that will get washed away.
 
  #3  
Old 11-06-2017
warmblood58's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am willing to take the risk as some of the ideas around synthetic seem to be based on mythology - My truck unfortunately is often started in the morning and then driven a few short miles and then shut down -I think synthetic would be better for such short service cycles vs dino due to better start up lubrication.
 
  #4  
Old 11-07-2017
mhoward's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I'm with Tsquare. That isn't a myth. Dino, as you call it :), has one type of detergent. The synthetic has a different kind (and more efficient/aggressive). The synthetic WILL start cleaning away any sludge left over time and miles. The leaking gaskets are a good possibility, BUT, not a guarantee. That being said, proceed at your own risk.
 
  #5  
Old 11-07-2017
warmblood58's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, yes, I am aware that buildup can be removed (not a myth). Service history was very good and I am hopeful that low miles will assist in switching over -might just go the Amsoil route -thanks!
 
  #6  
Old 11-07-2017
mhoward's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That's cool. Good luck! :)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Urandaman
OLD - Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc.
44
02-08-2010 08:06 PM
Dropped98
OLD - Ranger Based Vehicles
0
09-06-2009 12:59 AM
2001fordranger
OLD - Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc.
22
08-31-2009 11:25 AM
strakill
OLD - Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc.
21
04-03-2009 07:13 PM
The_Punisher
OLD - Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc.
3
02-13-2009 09:25 PM



Quick Reply: 05/20 forNorthern California 4.0 1993 Ranger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.