05/20 forNorthern California 4.0 1993 Ranger - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


Oil & Lubrication General discussion of motor oil and lubrication products and analysis.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
05/20 forNorthern California 4.0 1993 Ranger

My understanding is that 05/20 is the spec by the Feds for fuel mileage for the 4.0 engine (1993). My new to me 4x4 ranger just turned 130,00o miles, should I switch to a Mobile One product, 0/30 or other or just stay with Dino 05/20. Our temps get down into the 20's here in the winters and summers are high 90's and low 100's at times. Any thoughts? Thanks!

James
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Tsquare's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Lawrenceville
Posts: 94
Use the oil weight recommended.

If you know the service history and it has been serviced with dino up to 130k I would not switch it over to synthetic. Synthetic is better oil but if you swap over you may have dino varnish that is plugging up some leaky gaskets that will get washed away.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
I am willing to take the risk as some of the ideas around synthetic seem to be based on mythology - My truck unfortunately is often started in the morning and then driven a few short miles and then shut down -I think synthetic would be better for such short service cycles vs dino due to better start up lubrication.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1 Weeks Ago
mhoward's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 552
I'm with Tsquare. That isn't a myth. Dino, as you call it :), has one type of detergent. The synthetic has a different kind (and more efficient/aggressive). The synthetic WILL start cleaning away any sludge left over time and miles. The leaking gaskets are a good possibility, BUT, not a guarantee. That being said, proceed at your own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1 Week Ago
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fairfax
Posts: 15
Thanks, yes, I am aware that buildup can be removed (not a myth). Service history was very good and I am hopeful that low miles will assist in switching over -might just go the Amsoil route -thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1 Week Ago
mhoward's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 552
That's cool. Good luck! :)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: 07 Ranger Parts-California Urandaman Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc. 44 02-08-2010 09:06 PM
1998 Ford Ranger Extra Cab in SF Bay Area California Dropped98 Ranger Based Vehicles 0 09-06-2009 01:59 AM
For Sale: Ranger Parts For Sale (california) 2001fordranger Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc. 22 08-31-2009 12:25 PM
California.2000 ranger 2wd parts for sale strakill Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc. 21 04-03-2009 08:13 PM
WTB 05-06 ranger grill: California The_Punisher Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc. 3 02-13-2009 10:25 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.