General Technical & Electrical General technical and electrical discussion for the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

1995 Ranger 2.3L 2wd getting less than 15 mpg on a good day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2023
  #1  
Mitchie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, Arkansas
1995 Ranger 2.3L 2wd getting less than 15 mpg on a good day

So I have a 95 Ranger (actually a B2300 but y'all ain't new to that paradigm). 2wd, Automatic. My fuel economy stinks. I'm only getting 12-15 HWY. We've recorded a couple of tanks that got 22 combined, and then then A/C cut out. It dropped after A/C was remedied (recharged because refrigerant leak was too small to justify fixing the leak. We thought that was part of it, but even when the A/C is turned off, the mpg is still 14 or less.


Here's the mundane

I got this truck from a friend who got it from a cousin that modded it. It's as redneck as dining barefoot an' usin' a Confederate flag as an emotional support blanket. Custom camo, a tiny custom bed that makes it as aerodynamic as a cutaway. 16 inch mustang wheels (yes, my mpg numbers account for the bigger than stock wheels).

​​​

Here's the crucial

I was told by a mechanic to check the MAF. Power and signal check out.

The EGR is bypassed and has a bolt to plug the vacuum line but doesn't have the port blocked. Not done by me. The cat was cut and straight piped by previous owner, but both O2 sensors are there. They left the muffler at least.....

Code scanner shows P0141 and P0401, which correspond with

​​02 Sensor Heater Circuit Bank 1 Sensor 2 and Exhaust Gas Recirculation Flow Insufficient Detected respectively.

I don't know if the heater circuit code is a possible response for high exhaust heat or just a faulty sensor. Would love some insight before my next planned step of replacing the cat and downstream O2. Engine other wise seems to run smooth. I have very little power, but I assume that's in part to blame the mustang wheels for, but again, I don't. Thanks in advance, guys
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2023
  #2  
2011Supercab's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 393
From: Everett, WA
The bigger tires are making your engine work harder, which makes it use more fuel.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2023
  #3  
Mitchie's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Rogers, Arkansas
Originally Posted by 2011Supercab
The bigger tires are making your engine work harder, which makes it use more fuel.
I wondered about that. How likely you think that alone is responsible for cutting the fuel economy nearly in half? Should I skip reinstalling the cat and replacing the O2 sensors and just change to stock wheels?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BillCranstonTheBlueRanger
General Technical & Electrical
5
Jul 18, 2021 03:16 PM
54inches
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
0
Apr 30, 2020 07:42 PM
Sizeofthesewalls
General Technical & Electrical
4
Sep 28, 2018 11:19 AM
'96 Stranger
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
1
Oct 29, 2012 04:22 AM
gotmud?
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
4
Sep 13, 2009 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM.