I saw these tires first hand for the first time today. And with all the controversy over them i have to say i would run em. They do look more aggressive than the bfg's and at a better price i don't think you could go wrong.

 

http://www.generaltire.com/generator...master_en.html
they look pretty much the same but i havent seen these in person

 

I have those tires and there nice. There is a little more space between the lugs on them then there are a bfg tires.

 

I have the AT2's and I couldn't be happier.

 

yeah ive seen these around, hows the tread life on em?

 

+1 on that one

 

only downside to these are they seem to be a little softer then the BFG ATs. ill have to ask my friend who runs these on his 86 F250 with the 6.9 deezil how his wear was.

 

I've got about 15k on mine and they still look new.

 

same here id say i have about 15k and they are looking good as ever, no chunking or nothing plus they are really quite

 

Anyone try these tires in the snow. I always had BFG's on my trucks and suv's.

 

They're the best tire I've ever had in the snow. They can chew through the deep stuff and they are siped so they handle good on ice.

 

bfgs are better in anything that is slick like wet roads,and in the mud you need a lot of power to clean these things

 

No way are the BFG's better in the snow. That's what I had before the Grabbers. The Grabbers are better in all aspects. BFG's get gummed up pretty easy but the Grabbers clean out very well for an AT. They have more spacing between the tread lugs therefore you get more bite and they clean out better.