4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Jeep 4.0 in a ranger.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #1  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Jeep 4.0 in a ranger.

Yes, I thought about it.. and I'm starting to really think about it.

It, like the 4.0 OHV is a bulletproof and torqey motor, but the Jeep motor/transmission combo has a ton more aftermarket when it comes to transmissions, adapters and transfer cases..

Who has really looked at how an I6 4.0 mounts up? and how big it is in relation to a ranger motor/trans/t-case. I guess this is where the ranger-gone-jeep-owners will help out..

Lemme know what you think.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #2  
red_fx2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: lakeland, fl
i think it would be a great idea, like u said the 4.0 I-6 is a bulletproof motor plus a good amount of tq, it'd be cool to see this happen
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #3  
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
From: Madison. AL
So first you sas the truck and now you talk about putting a jeep motor in your truck?.....wouldn't it of been cheaper to buy a jeep? lol j/k

Though if your going to go to that much hassle I would just v8 your ranger.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #4  
chainfire's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 3
From: Mission B.C.
Why not just mount up a Ford trans that has more aftermarket parts? Same as the T-case? Or a 302?

From what I remember on my buddies Cherokee, it is long. Obviously an Inline is going to be longer than a V6.

Honestly I think the only way you are going to find out is if you can go to the wreckers and measure everything up.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #5  
TheStig88's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 4
From: Columbia, Missouri
hell, keep it ford and put the 300 ci straight 6 in it.....
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #6  
red_fx2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: lakeland, fl
300 straight 6 would be badass to.. lol.... might wana check over on jeepsunlimited.com for spec's on the 4.0, good info over there just a bunch of douches..


242cu inch long block
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #7  
08XLT4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 2
From: bomba shack
5.0

5.0

5.0

!!!
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #8  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Hmm, I dont know man. My buddy has one and it is a kinda long block. If you are going threw that hassle, I would just put a 5.0 in. Do you have any reason why not to?
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #9  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
So first you sas the truck and now you talk about putting a jeep motor in your truck?.....wouldn't it of been cheaper to buy a jeep? lol j/k

Though if your going to go to that much hassle I would just v8 your ranger.
haha
Jeeps are lame.. I saw a sticker that said, "You bought that? I BUILT this!"

I want that sticker some day, I'm not worthy of it yet being that the truck is still really mild. A v8 would be cool, I'm also tossing around the idea of a carbureted 302 runnin on propane. A Jeep 4.0 just has SOOOOO much aftermarket for it. hell i can get 4:1 in a stock tcase, or just get a rubicon case and bolt it up for 4:1.. I can get a Dana 300 to bolt up to a jeep trans probably and thats a really good case, and not as fawking huge as a 205.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #10  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by chainfire
Honestly I think the only way you are going to find out is if you can go to the wreckers and measure everything up.
I work at a shop that has jeeps coming in all the time, so i could just measure one there.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #11  
Woods-Rider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, OR
like has been said, if you are gonna swap motors why not go 302 or 351, hell, 5.4 for that matter lol.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #12  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
I think the engine would be too long for the Ranger's engine bay.

Why 5.0? Everyone does is or wants to do it. I say be different.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #13  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by robert99ranger
Hmm, I dont know man. My buddy has one and it is a kinda long block. If you are going threw that hassle, I would just put a 5.0 in. Do you have any reason why not to?
I love the sound of V8s.. but 302s in rangers are all over the place.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #14  
TrucknGolf's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I think you would regret it if you put a jeep 4.0. Atleast a 5.0 and if it was propane it would be even better.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #15  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Woods-Rider
like has been said, if you are gonna swap motors why not go 302 or 351, hell, 5.4 for that matter lol.
a 5.4 is HUGE. Maybe a chevy 5.3, or 6.0. i guess a 6.0 is huge.. but its cool

Originally Posted by fddriver02
I think the engine would be too long for the Ranger's engine bay.

Why 5.0? Everyone does is or wants to do it. I say be different.
I could wait till i truggy it so i have no restrictions
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #16  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
toyota driveline would be cool, but I hate that there are NO options for a front dig capability on toyota drivelines.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #17  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
If I the intent on keeping my truck and making it a offroad rig only I would stick with a 4.0. Toyota 4.0 that is. With 6 the speed.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #18  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
if your going carbed put a 351 in that is a much better motor than the 302, not to mention its got alot more power.

I cant figure out why to put in a 302, what is a stock 302 rated? and after the swap are you(or anyone) really going to have the money to beef it up? or before for that matter.

Going a carbed 351 will open many doors, worst problem will be a manual tranny and a manual tcase, but find the right F250 and I think you would be golden. I am sure some f150s had it too. That would be a BW1356M which would then open the doors for a STAK Monster 3 speed case.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #19  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
a 5.4 is HUGE. :
it is pretty big, but it will mount between the frame rails. so its possible. worst part is the wiring, i am dreading that already.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #20  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by zabeard
if your going carbed put a 351 in that is a much better motor than the 302, not to mention its got alot more power.

I cant figure out why to put in a 302, what is a stock 302 rated? and after the swap are you(or anyone) really going to have the money to beef it up? or before for that matter.

Going a carbed 351 will open many doors, worst problem will be a manual tranny and a manual tcase, but find the right F250 and I think you would be golden. I am sure some f150s had it too. That would be a BW1356M which would then open the doors for a STAK Monster 3 speed case.
there's a big thread on pirate about how the 3 speed staks like to pop out of gear

Originally Posted by zabeard
it is pretty big, but it will mount between the frame rails. so its possible. worst part is the wiring, i am dreading that already.
Hence reasons 1 through 9532325 Why i want a carb'd engine.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #21  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
there's a big thread on pirate about how the 3 speed staks like to pop out of gear



Hence reasons 1 through 9532325 Why i want a carb'd engine.
really, never seen it. all well i cant afford one right now anyway.

thats why Nick is wiring mine. LOL And im still worried about it!
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #22  
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 6
From: Muncy, PA
couldnt you use an f150 tranny and tcase with a 351 out of a newer bronco that has mas air?
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #23  
red_fx2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: lakeland, fl
even tho is a small toyota motor.. the 22R is a beast....but then again it is a 4cyl....
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #24  
sullys_ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 1
From: NewLexington, Ohio
not a bad idea. my buddy put a 300 straight 6 in his 96
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009
  #25  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by red_fx2
even tho is a small toyota motor.. the 22R is a beast....but then again it is a 4cyl....
those little 4 bangers still break tons of crap.. it could very well be the 10:1 reduction in the t-case's though
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.