Snapshots Share photos of vehicles in this sub-forum.

2010 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2009
  #26  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
time to change the shorts...got a mess in 'em.





omg that color....perfect.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009
  #27  
Trigger01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
Camaro looks good, but the new Mustang looks a lot better.
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2009
  #28  
REUBER's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
From: US Army
i dont like em.....they are starting to be in St Cloud..yellow, black and red around here...i think they are ugly
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #29  
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Does his brembo brakes have 2 stacks of sticky wheel weights on them? GM added wheel weights to keep the brakes from sqeaking apparently.



I think GM failed to remember that those weights will fall off once the brakes get hot, or maybe even melt the lead.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #30  
TheBearJeweler's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 2
From: Arkansas
Im getting the 2011 GT stang with the 302. The new camaro is nice but a loaded 2-SS runs above 40 grand... You can get a 2010 Mustang GT500 for 46 grand and OWN that thing and have the nicer car...

Name:  3324191445_83eb163a9b.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  29.0 KB
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #31  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
Originally Posted by REUBER
i dont like em.....they are starting to be in St Cloud..yellow, black and red around here...i think they are ugly
yeah same here. its the new d-bag car i think.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #32  
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by jeweler54
Im getting the 2011 GT stang with the 302. The new camaro is nice but a loaded 2-SS runs above 40 grand... You can get a 2010 Mustang GT500 for 46 grand and OWN that thing and have the nicer car...
Glad to hear your waiting for the new 5.0. I'm with you on the SS vs. GT500 thing. The main drawback to the new Camaro is the weight. It's a heavy little piggy.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #33  
TheBearJeweler's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 2
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by karrbass4life
Glad to hear your waiting for the new 5.0. I'm with you on the SS vs. GT500 thing. The main drawback to the new Camaro is the weight. It's a heavy little piggy.
Camaro= nice but If i buy one I will have to wear wife beaters, drink PBR and marry my cousin.... none of this will every happen

Mustang=EPIC PANTY DROPPER since 1964 baby!
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #34  
BCobe's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 2
From: Fairfeild,California
Yea the GT500 is freaking BAD
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2009
  #35  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by karrbass4life
Does his brembo brakes have 2 stacks of sticky wheel weights on them? GM added wheel weights to keep the brakes from sqeaking apparently.



I think GM failed to remember that those weights will fall off once the brakes get hot, or maybe even melt the lead.
Its one of the many cheap design problem fixes you see at the launch of any new vehicle.

My brembo's are better.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.