2010 Camaro - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


Snapshots Share photos of vehicles in this sub-forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-22-2009
bucky919's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 1,943
2010 Camaro

Stop by the house were building this morning to check and make sure the crew was actually workin today and did try and take a long weekend and look what was sitting in my buddies garage across the street getting some fresh tint. Ive drove both this and the '10 stang now and its a toss up, there both amazing cars. Wish I would of had the DSLR with, but only had the ps, so this will have to do






Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2009
Woods-Rider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 1,108
That thing is HOT!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2009
Jimmeh's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia Falls, MT
Posts: 3,224
Meh, I am still undecided about it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-22-2009
sniper_101's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sask, Canada
Posts: 1,902
I like the garage better . . .
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-22-2009
99XLTman's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bradenton Fl
Posts: 411
I freaking LOVE that car!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
one went past work twice yesterday.. amazing car. i hate what ford did with the tail lights on the new mustang, the 370Z has nice tail lights but they fawked up the bumper.. blah new cars.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2009
Lazler's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 5,526
ugliest car ever!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
silly canadians..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2009
crazymikey's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: your mom
Posts: 4,008
I love the new Camaro. I'd take it over a Challenger in a heart beat.

I also really like the new Mustang, but I absolutely hate the rear end the way it's all angled and mushed up in the corners.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
how are the camaros speed wise? i know the Challengers are heavy as **** and there for not very fast.

that would be the tie breaker between the 2 for me.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-22-2009
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 559, CA
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4 View Post
i hate what ford did with the tail lights on the new mustang.
I ALWAYS hate what Ford does with the mustang tail lights. Actually not just the tails, the whole back end. This new F-Body, on the other hand, is sexshy all the way around.

Last edited by gts007; 05-22-2009 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-22-2009
buzzzsaw's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Where u are
Posts: 63
Too boxy or sumpin...just cant dig it..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-22-2009
bucky919's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 1,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper_101 View Post
I like the garage better . . .
Same here, Im going to set up my parents at there new house very similar. Im never going to move out lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4 View Post
how are the camaros speed wise? i know the Challengers are heavy as **** and there for not very fast.

that would be the tie breaker between the 2 for me.
It was fast enough for me, compared to driving the F150 lol. I have no clue number wise im sure google knows though....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-22-2009
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 2,827
I do not like the back end of those cars.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-22-2009
Roddy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,332
SICK those things UTTERLY OWN MUSTANGS...through and through
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-22-2009
Sixt9coug's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Norwalk, CA
Posts: 1,034
I HATE the back end and interior on these cars, but the LS engines are always awesome. I like the front and the sides alot though and the G8 platform its based on is pure secks.

As far as fast... next model year Ford is putting the 5.0L modular into the Mustang with 400hp. So the Camaro is faster for this year at least.......

I cant wait for the 3.5L twin turbo engine to go into the Mustang. That thing will be total win.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-22-2009
BCobe's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fairfeild,California
Posts: 1,055
GOD thats sexy
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-22-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7 Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: My LED lab or on the dyno
Posts: 2,970
I was playing with one of those the other day on the highway...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-22-2009
EricRanger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cary, IL
Posts: 801
klx110 all the way, FTC. lol
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-23-2009
buzzzsaw's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Where u are
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jp7 View Post
I was playing with one of those the other day on the highway...
Yeah me too..... the guy even had a mullet!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-23-2009
03bamaGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 1,752
I had two kids in a V6 '10 Camaro try to race me. They got a quick lesson in losing. I really want to run a V8 to see what happens. The V6 was a joke.

The car looks way to short to me. Don't like it or the new Mustang. The 4.5 link rear is cool though.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-23-2009
03bamaGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 1,752
The V6s weigh 3750lbs and the V8 weighs a 'mere' 3900 haha. Talk about a tank. Only 600 more lbs then me.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-23-2009
99XLTman's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bradenton Fl
Posts: 411
Yeah they are heavy, the V6 was a considerable amount faster than what i expected though.

They are like 304 HP i think. It wasn't unbearably slow or anything, i'd rather have the SS though.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-23-2009
buzzzsaw's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Where u are
Posts: 63
That SS freakin rocks...Im like bama though....i dont really like the rearend on either of them...But I would drive an ss...I like that gauge pod mounted in front of the shifter, kinda looks like the old skool camaros..
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-23-2009
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 8,703
twin turbo that V6 camero and you'll have some competition...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.