Post your vehicular sightings!!! Open to all vehicles!!!
#1677
Me to i love the way the camaros look. However i cant stand the HUGE bind spot call the rear end of the car which is 100 times worst if you add a spoiler.But that shouldnt be a problem for the one i posted above it has a sweet backup cam
#1682
Since i'm legally bound to not take any pictures at work.
Take a look at what i see everyday.
http://www.caranddriver.com/photos-1...o-photo-404337
Take a look at what i see everyday.
http://www.caranddriver.com/photos-1...o-photo-404337
#1684
#1685
isn't much different.
Ecoboost.
has better crash and safety ratings than most of the cars out there now. has these new "knee" airbags. the deploy out the bottom of the dash and stop you from going too far forward. We had an issue when the first tested this idea, the bar that holds the airbag under the dash was forcing the air bag to open up above your knees and really not doing anything.
Ecoboost.
has better crash and safety ratings than most of the cars out there now. has these new "knee" airbags. the deploy out the bottom of the dash and stop you from going too far forward. We had an issue when the first tested this idea, the bar that holds the airbag under the dash was forcing the air bag to open up above your knees and really not doing anything.
#1686
#1687
#1690
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 3GS)
Seriously it's just a over priced 2 door impala that found its way into a vice and Chevy threw a 6.2 in it from a truck and you have a horrible car.
Seriously it's just a over priced 2 door impala that found its way into a vice and Chevy threw a 6.2 in it from a truck and you have a horrible car.
#1691
#1692
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 3GS)
Hey I work on mustangs all day, I do know a good ammount just hate the way they look. Under the hood is nothing special. The suspension is meh okay. The braking is better than the GT. but if it came down to choosing one or the other I'd choose the ford.
Originally Posted by SteelDirigible
What you say makes no sense. How is a camaro an impala?
Thats a different 6.2 as well...
you have clearly not had much experience with camaros or you would not say they are "terrible"
its cool if you dont like them but you are just sputtering bs right now.
Thats a different 6.2 as well...
you have clearly not had much experience with camaros or you would not say they are "terrible"
its cool if you dont like them but you are just sputtering bs right now.
#1693
I'd still rather have a 392 Challenger.
Them Camaros are slick cars, good runners. you sit low in the car and feel surrounded by the dash which is cool.
The Mustangs are alrite, I've driven a bunch of them. any one of them can burn the tires off if you try hard enough. But every johnny street racer has one now days.
Now Challengers, 6.3L 392 cu. Heavy, wide and fast. How it should be.
Them Camaros are slick cars, good runners. you sit low in the car and feel surrounded by the dash which is cool.
The Mustangs are alrite, I've driven a bunch of them. any one of them can burn the tires off if you try hard enough. But every johnny street racer has one now days.
Now Challengers, 6.3L 392 cu. Heavy, wide and fast. How it should be.
#1696