Snapshots Share photos of vehicles in this sub-forum.

The Ranger is gone....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2010
  #1  
dallas_01gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 116
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
The Ranger is gone....

Figured I would post up a few pictures of my '98 Ranger. My dad purchased this truck back in 1999 with 2,500 miles on it. I purchased it from him in 2006 with 178,000 miles. I installed a 3" Body Lift, 3" Spindle, and 33" tires. Overall, it was a very good, reliable truck. I ended up selling it back in October. I miss the truck, but with 202,000 miles it was time for something different. I purchased a 2005 Jeep Liberty Renegade, I needed something with more space and 4wd. It's a 6 speed manual, 3.7L, and best of all, only 33,500 miles.

Thanks for all the info I have been able to get out of these forums! Here's a few pics....

Name:  101_0425.jpg
Views: 112
Size:  95.9 KB
Name:  101_0418.jpg
Views: 102
Size:  92.3 KB
Name:  101_4943.jpg
Views: 126
Size:  131.1 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010
  #2  
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 3
From: RI
ewe a Chrysler Product :vomit:
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010
  #3  
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
VOM.... your ranger probably ran better with 202k then a 3.7 with 33k
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010
  #4  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
I understand about the high mileage thing, but the Ranger was better IMO.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010
  #5  
evilclown312's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 1
From: Logan ohio
Originally Posted by Toreador4x4
VOM.... your ranger probably ran better with 202k then a 3.7 with 33k
Valid statement right here :) My moms has like 18k on it and is already leaking oil or somthing, maybe burning it, i just know i checked it and it wasnt even on the dipstick, and we do regular maintinence on it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2010
  #6  
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
3.7 and 3.8 motors are the worst for oil consumption...they do it from new
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010
  #7  
Trigger01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
That was ranger was in pretty good shape for that many miles. That Jeep wouldn't have been my choice, but I hope you like it.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dave01978
General Ford Ranger Discussion
14
Jan 22, 2009 07:05 PM
texasbullseye89
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
Aug 12, 2008 11:04 PM
2003stealthedge
General Ford Ranger Discussion
11
Apr 14, 2008 11:42 AM
wanted
General Ford Ranger Discussion
5
May 21, 2006 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 AM.