Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource

Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource (https://www.ranger-forums.com/)
-   SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines (https://www.ranger-forums.com/sohc-2-3l-2-5l-lima-engines-135/)
-   -   Blown 2.3L !!! (https://www.ranger-forums.com/sohc-2-3l-2-5l-lima-engines-135/blown-2-3l-54522/)

Johnbaum13 01-13-2009 06:15 PM

I agree about the turbo coupe computer being more likely to handle the boost, it's already referenced for forced air on a 2.3.

Bryan22 01-14-2009 02:11 PM


Originally Posted by elementsenjoi (Post 1170106)
That is a 4 cyl turbo?
I have the MAF and Throttle body from the SuperCoupe, but I am only using the TB right now. I have the stock 2.3 MAF on it now.

What about the 2.3T Mustang?

ya, same motor as the mustang or merkur ect... any turbo 2.3 you can find, i'd use the computer MAF and injectors out of... that's just what i'd do tho.

TheStig88 01-14-2009 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by fddriver02 (Post 1170136)


HEY!!! thats my idea!!

freddie 01-14-2009 02:19 PM

Why not build a 2.3Turbo, or swap one in out of an 80's Thunderbird Turbocoupe? It'll have a HUGE power potential compared to that, and get better mileage when you're just driving it easy. I mean, cool to try something different,,.. but... idk, a supercharger on a 4 cylinder? You're robbing HP just to try to make some. Swapping in a Turbocoupe engine, computer, and turbo would be MUCH more efficient, and powerful..

EDIT: And I REALLY hope you change pullies on that! A stock engine is only going to hold up to 5-8PSI before you blow something, and that's 5-8PSI IF you have it tuned!

elementsenjoi 01-14-2009 03:04 PM


Originally Posted by freddie (Post 1171455)
Why not build a 2.3Turbo, or swap one in out of an 80's Thunderbird Turbocoupe? It'll have a HUGE power potential compared to that, and get better mileage when you're just driving it easy. I mean, cool to try something different,,.. but... idk, a supercharger on a 4 cylinder? You're robbing HP just to try to make some. Swapping in a Turbocoupe engine, computer, and turbo would be MUCH more efficient, and powerful..

EDIT: And I REALLY hope you change pullies on that! A stock engine is only going to hold up to 5-8PSI before you blow something, and that's 5-8PSI IF you have it tuned!


I'm not looking to make it efficient, and I'm not looking to make a racecar. I am doing it to try something different.

Why would I swap in something that has already been built? That is the easy way out. I really think you should research it a little more too. The M90 doesn't take away THAT much HP. Just from the little bit I have driven it, I noticed a huge gain in power. I am not a dyno junkie, and I 'm not trying to squeeze every little bit of power out of this poor motor. I am just looking for a decent amount of power so it will get out of its own way.

What is wrong with a supercharged 4cyl? Just because it isn't common practice doesn't mean it is a bad thing. Just because there isn't a 'kit', and it isn't 'bolt on' doesn't mean it can't be done. How do you know that a turbo'd 4cyl is better? Have you ever built either one? Have you ever supercharged a Lima 2300?

If you would have read any of my other posts you would know that I am going to change the crank pulley. You are not telling me anything I do not know.

BTW if I blow it up I will build my own motor with forged crank, rods, and pistons. I won't just swap in a motor that already has that done.

I am doing this BECAUSE I CAN. If it doesn't turn out great, oh well. If it turns out to run like a raped ape for another 100,000 miles I promise not to rub it in your face.

--Chris

short_circus 01-14-2009 04:07 PM


Originally Posted by fddriver02 (Post 1170136)

"Mad Max: Beyond Power Dome"?

roflmao

Great build bro, can't wait to see more of it.

elementsenjoi 01-15-2009 02:58 PM

We got the bypass valve built in today, and took it for a ride. With the bypass open it still makes about 2 1/2 pound of boost. It runs fine with the bypass open. With the bypass closed all of the way(full boost) it still loses fuel at 7 psi. We shimmed the valve open a little bit and ran it around town. It seems to run great at around 5 psi. The stock fuel strategy just can't keep up even at full rich. The bypass will be cable operated so it can be manually opened and closed instead of by vacuum.

elementsenjoi 02-12-2009 01:02 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Okay, here are some pictures of it with the hood and grill back on. A couple vids too. Sorry they suck I don't know how to make the video resolution bigger on my camera.

Attachment 174504
Attachment 174505
Attachment 174506


Walk Around:
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n...WalkAround.jpg

Boost @ high RPM:
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n...h-RPMBoost.jpg

Boost @ low RPM:
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n...w-RPMBoost.jpg


TO build the boost down low I just closed off the bypass valve more. With it like this it builds too much boost up high in the RPMs so I have to drive it like a diesel. Most of the time we have the bypass open father as to not build much boost at the bottom. That if we need to stretch it out we can without it falling on its face for lack of fuel.


EDIT" We have to fab up a way to mount some idler pulleys. The belt flops around like a fish out of water.

seed60 02-12-2009 01:08 PM


"Mad Max: Beyond Power Dome"?

roflmao
:biglaugh:

It looks awesome. I love what you did with the exhaust!!

TexasRanger 02-12-2009 01:15 PM

looks real good. i also really like the exhaust

whippersnapper02 02-12-2009 01:15 PM

If it just me or does the motor sound like its misfiring badly?

robert99ranger 02-12-2009 01:20 PM

How quick have you had it yet?

elementsenjoi 02-12-2009 01:23 PM


Originally Posted by fddriver02 (Post 1210515)
If it just me or does the motor sound like its misfiring badly?

Haha, it is just you. Everyone thinks that though. It is because we split the header. The right side exhaust is cyl. 1&2 and the left is 3&4. Only one window was down as well.

elementsenjoi 02-12-2009 01:24 PM


Originally Posted by cghstrojan08 (Post 1210523)
How quick have you had it yet?

lol almost 70. The truck is still slow, but it is driveable now. It gets out of its own way which is was really all we were hoping for.

Downey 02-12-2009 01:33 PM

dude that is sweet where are the burn out videos?

whippersnapper02 02-12-2009 01:34 PM


Originally Posted by elementsenjoi (Post 1210527)
Haha, it is just you. Everyone thinks that though. It is because we split the header. The right side exhaust is cyl. 1&2 and the left is 3&4. Only one window was down as well.

Oh. I though you were just trying to kill the motor.

elementsenjoi 02-12-2009 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by Downey (Post 1210536)
dude that is sweet where are the burn out videos?

None yet. Not that we haven't done it, just haven't had a camera there when we did.


Originally Posted by fddriver02 (Post 1210538)
Oh. I though you were just trying to kill the motor.

Nope.

Downey 02-12-2009 01:41 PM

haha yeah makes me think of an idea for my 4.0 hummm i would love to have a super charger or a 5.0 lol

ranger 02-12-2009 02:13 PM

California would **** them selves, if someone did that here.






California and there stupid ******* emissions.

04blackedge 02-12-2009 02:35 PM

Lol it sounds like a lawn mower on steriods. Neat build

robert99ranger 02-12-2009 02:59 PM


Originally Posted by 04blackedge (Post 1210604)
Lol it sounds like a lawn mower on steriods. Neat build

Thats what I was thinking but did not want to say it.

elementsenjoi 02-12-2009 03:36 PM

You have to hear it in person, it sounds a lot better. It does sound really weird though, that's why we did it. It sounds like no other truck on the road.

Bryan22 02-12-2009 03:48 PM

seems like it's still really slow.... why didn't you wind it up in the videos?

TheStig88 02-12-2009 03:56 PM

you wouldnt want to sell it now would you???

Bryan22 02-12-2009 04:05 PM

why on earth would you want to buy it? haha.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands