Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

10 bolt chevy side is good for SAS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #1  
emericax21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, Tx
10 bolt chevy side is good for SAS?

yeah as the title says.

and is it hard to put a NP 205 with my transmition
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #2  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
No the 10 bolt is not a good swap. it is passenger side diff, so it wont work. And there is no way to mate a NP205 to the ranger tranny.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #3  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
i thought it was passenger side but was not sure.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #4  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
You could probably mate it useing a "divorced" transfer case configuration, but you have issues with the gas tank location, adding another cross member, and you'll have a pretty weird geometry for the shifter with the transfer case that far back.

It would take quite a bit of engineering I think.

If you did that though, it would eliminate the issues with the passenger's side drop obviously.

A Chevy 10 bolt is basically a Dana 44 as far as strength and so forth. Might want to just find an appropriate 44?
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #5  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
you could do a divorced NP205 transfer case, but good luck finding one....and good luck coming up with the funds for it.....the divorced transfer case is a popular thing in off-road trucks....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #6  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by n3elz
You could probably mate it useing a "divorced" transfer case configuration, but you have issues with the gas tank location, adding another cross member, and you'll have a pretty weird geometry for the shifter with the transfer case that far back.

It would take quite a bit of engineering I think.

If you did that though, it would eliminate the issues with the passenger's side drop obviously.

A Chevy 10 bolt is basically a Dana 44 as far as strength and so forth. Might want to just find an appropriate 44?
huh.....just a bit tooo late i was.....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #7  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
i didnt even think about the divorced case, I was thinking only married
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #8  
emericax21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, Tx
Originally Posted by n3elz
You could probably mate it useing a "divorced" transfer case configuration, but you have issues with the gas tank location, adding another cross member, and you'll have a pretty weird geometry for the shifter with the transfer case that far back.

It would take quite a bit of engineering I think.

If you did that though, it would eliminate the issues with the passenger's side drop obviously.

A Chevy 10 bolt is basically a Dana 44 as far as strength and so forth. Might want to just find an appropriate 44?
yeah i know but has anybody done it here...... i was asking because i could get it for like 50 bucks or maybe ill just wait for a dana 44
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #9  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
you wont be saving any money in the long run, cause the amount of money to swap over to passenger drop, will far excced the cost of a D44
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #10  
emericax21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, Tx
ok....... ill go 44 then
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #11  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
you wont be saving any money in the long run, cause the amount of money to swap over to passenger drop, will far excced the cost of a D44
because to swap to a passanger drop on the axle, you will HAVE to go with a divorced transfer case.......no way around that unless you swap in a Chevy engine/tranny/transfer case combo....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #12  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
because to swap to a passanger drop on the axle, you will HAVE to go with a divorced transfer case.......no way around that unless you swap in a Chevy engine/tranny/transfer case combo....

dont even bring that idea up. then i would be ashamed to own it or even call it a ford.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #13  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by zabeard
dont even bring that idea up. then i would be ashamed to own it or even call it a ford.
pft our trucks are both mutts with all the different parts we have, whats another part added to the mix?
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #14  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
pft our trucks are both mutts with all the different parts we have, whats another part added to the mix?

at least we still have ford power plants
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #15  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by zabeard
dont even bring that idea up. then i would be ashamed to own it or even call it a ford.


that is 1 think that irratates me more than anything.....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #16  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
Hey, Chevy has made some OUTSTANDING powerplants and drivetrains. Were it practical, I'd consider some of that stuff myself based on it's longstanding reputation.

Ford has similar stuff as well, no question. There's a lot of good stuff out there from different manufacturers for sure -- it's just not always "within reach" to hybrid some of the stuff.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #17  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
i agree Chevy has made some good powerplants.........and for some reason, the aftermarket world too a following to them and not so much with Ford's.....parts are a lot cheaper for a 350 Chevy than a 351 Ford....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #18  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
You could likely have an adapter made for the NP205 case to take care of the 10 bolt's passenger drop. That'd be pretty pricey though I think...

And didn't the 10 bolt come with front-to-back steering? I know my Chevy D44 did. You'd have to convert that to crossover probably.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #19  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by Gearhead61
You could likely have an adapter made for the NP205 case to take care of the 10 bolt's passenger drop. That'd be pretty pricey though I think...

And didn't the 10 bolt come with front-to-back steering? I know my Chevy D44 did. You'd have to convert that to crossover probably.
the NP205 has a larger input shaft than the Ranger's tranny has output shaft.......it is also a larger mounting surface than what could fit under the Ranger......

and you would have to re-route the exhaust to the drivers side if it was a passanger side drop on a Ranger.....that means new, custom Y-pipe, hangers, and brackets.......but then the fuel tank is in the way on the drivers side...
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007
  #20  
emericax21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, Tx
any more opinions
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rangerstepside
Exterior Semi-Tech
15
Feb 24, 2017 04:53 PM
unclefester45102
Drivetrain Tech
0
Jan 2, 2010 08:14 PM
sullys_ranger
OLD - Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
2
Sep 28, 2009 02:24 PM
xRedGTx
General Ford Ranger Discussion
17
Sep 23, 2008 03:58 PM
chukzie
Drivetrain Tech
4
Jun 18, 2005 09:43 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.