General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

New truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #1  
kx592's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: asbury
New truck

I finally purchased an 05 3.0 2wd extended cab ranger off my grandfather. I bought it off him with 14750 miles for 6000. Its spot less and has a bed cover over it. Truck runs like a champ, im very please with it. Just takes some getting use to since im use ot driving my 250 lol Anywho, I calculated milege one time and got 22.3 combined driving, fairly easy. I thought I should be getting better than that with a 3.0 2wd? Also After getting my oil changed and throatle body cleaned i can notice a decline in milege? Any input fellas? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #2  
Crackerstein's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Basically hanging out, sm
22.3 sounds about right for your gas mileage.

The 3.0 is known for the power of a four cylinder and the fuel economy of the 4.0 V6.

My single cab 2wd 3.0 gets an average of 20 or so.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #3  
96RpAaNjGoErR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: wellington
PICS???
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #4  
kx592's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: asbury
Are you saying a 4.0 gets better millage than the 3.0? I thought the 3.0 was the better motor for millage and the 4.0 was for moderate towing. Ill get pics up one of these days. Its a bone stock gold extend. 6ft.

Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #5  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by kx592
Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
In my opinion, they are not worth the money on a stock tuned engine. Good cold air intakes are pretty expensive. I would just get a good drop-in filter for the stock CAI, maybe take out the snorkel.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #6  
kx592's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: asbury
Originally Posted by KLC
In my opinion, they are not worth the money. Good cold air intakes are pretty expensive. I would just get a good drop-in filter for the stock CAI.
Im not familiar with what your talkin about. can you explain that a little more, maybe post a link to the item? Id appreciate it man
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #7  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Like these: AFE Pro-Dry S Air Filters

The one I linked is reusable and oil-free.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #8  
kx592's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: asbury
Hows the improvement using this compared to stock? Do you notice better performance and millage or not really?
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #9  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by kx592
Hows the improvement using this compared to stock? Do you notice better performance and millage or not really?
An increased throttle response and a slight MPG increase have been reported. I feel the change is negligible, but it won't hurt. Not to mention, you won't have to buy any filters for awhile.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #10  
Grot's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 122
Likes: 1
From: Knox, Tennessee
My 2.3 is only gettin 16-18 MPG. Id love 22
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009
  #11  
Crackerstein's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Basically hanging out, sm
Originally Posted by kx592
Are you saying a 4.0 gets better millage than the 3.0? I thought the 3.0 was the better motor for millage and the 4.0 was for moderate towing. Ill get pics up one of these days. Its a bone stock gold extend. 6ft.

Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
No, the 3.0 gets better than the 4.0, but not much. The 4.0 however has much more HP.

The 2.3L gets MUCH better MPG, with just slightly less HP and torque than the 3.0.



The 3.0 is however, known to be a pretty solid, reliable motor.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009
  #12  
DillonT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
wow. i get like 13-15 mpg with my 3.0 your lucky!
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009
  #13  
wildbill's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
From: Crestwood
Get rid of that air silencer and get a free breathing drop-in filter. You can get more ambitious with a less restrictive exhaust, but then you're spending some money. Anyway, easy in and easy out always improves a motors power and economy.

I don't know why cleaning your TB hurt the mileage...it should have helped a little.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shuckyd
New Ideas
24
Aug 7, 2012 07:50 PM
TRAVELER
Member Introductions
28
Sep 22, 2009 01:19 PM
red_ranger_2000
Member Introductions
30
Jul 24, 2008 12:27 AM
Duke
Member Introductions
15
Jun 21, 2008 01:35 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.