2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

3.0's are very slow.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #1  
Jeremy102579's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: North Tonawanda, NY
3.0's are very slow.

i used to have a 92 4.0 ranger and recently bought a 94 3.0 ranger stick shift.
i heard these things were slow and i totally agree, very slowwwwwwwwww.

why is this and is there anything to do to help it somewhat?

i am guessing the engines are too small and underpowered for the size truck?

94 3.0 supercab stick shift.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #2  
Earl43P's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 4
From: Elizabeth City, NC
Use all the rpms.

Shift at >/= 4500.

Taller tires will make it worse unless you regear your rear.

I put 235/70/15s in place of the stock 245/75/16s tires/wheels. Now I rarely use first gear to pull out.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #3  
eguy208's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Originally Posted by Earl43P

Taller tires will make it worse unless you regear your rear.

I second that. I'm running 33's without regearing and I have NO power whatsoever, lol.

-Levino
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #4  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
the 3.0L powerband is funny.. most of its torque peaks at ~4000 rpms, but I can shift at 2000 rpms and get up and go just fine, it has good enough torque IMO. however it sucks around 3000 rpms, so thats why I shift early or go all the way!! haha
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #5  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
ya know.. i have a newer 3.0, and yea it aint a fast thing, but its fine, i dont race people, an when i have er in 4low with the 35's i think it works awesome.. cause with my 32's it had almost too much torque in 4low

yes its slow.. get over bit :P
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #6  
dangerranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: muskego, wi
I test drove one and then just had to get a 4.0. i cant imagine the 4 banger those must be awful.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #7  
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 5
From: Kent State, Kent Ohio
i dunno maybe i have a 4.0 in a 3.0 mask or im jsut shelterd but for the most part as long as im not going 60 when i put the gas down it goes pretty good... i passed some truck going maybe 50 yesterday and it took me less then 5 seconds to get infront of him w/o cutting him off, and i was right behind him going the same speed as him...


id love to see what a sohc is like though just to feel the diffrence..
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #8  
Msl747's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
The 3.0 aint the best engine ever, but it gets the job done and is very reliable. I would imagine that I would have no problems hitting the 90mph speed gov on the highway, but how would I know, its not like i've ever done it...
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #9  
a311fanam's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
From: Westerly, RI
my 3.0 (with stick) and 31's has pleanty of power, i ain't no rice burner
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006
  #10  
Silver's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 1
From: edenton,nc
no the 3.0 is not fast but it will run for ever
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #11  
DaGGer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: East Windsor, CT
I have a 3.0L and its really not that much slower than my friends 2000 Blazer, he has a 4.3L 5 speed and with one other person in his truck and no one in my mine i can keep up and then in 3rd pull on him but then as soon as 4th hits hes gone lol.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #12  
mudranger96's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 1
From: Lehigh Acres, FL
Yes i admit my 96 has a 3.0L and it is the biggest terd. However the thing still runs like a champ after all the beating i have put it through.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #13  
DangaRanger99's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, NH
Hey anyway you look at it, Rangers are trucks, most trucks arnt intended to be fast anyways!! hehe.


I got the 4.0 and my friend had a 3.0, i had 32x11 Thornbirds on my truck and he has 31x10.5 on his and i thought he was in reverse, i thought about hitting the brakes to see if his reverse lights were on lol, dont get me wrong, mines no race truck either, no rangers are unless u got a V8 in them!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #14  
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 2
From: Valrico, Fl 33594
carrots are orange
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #15  
DangaRanger99's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, NH
and roses are red
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #16  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
violets are blue
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #17  
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 5
From: Kent State, Kent Ohio
this thread is ruined...beacause of you....

it even ryhmes...
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #18  
telemaster1952's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere
k&n oil and air filter, compy programmer
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #19  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
well not all of us 4 bangers are slow :) I wouidn't underestimate them

pretty soon mines gonna be nice
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #20  
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 5
From: Kent State, Kent Ohio
no, every sub 01 4cyl is slow.... theyve got like 90rwhp
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #21  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
The 3.0L isnt THAT bad..I whooped my friends '03 XLT w/ the 2.3L and 5-speed, his was a reg cab flareside too, compared to my fleetside 4dr. extended cab.. Just my .02
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #22  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
Originally Posted by 4X2XLT
no, every sub 01 4cyl is slow.... theyve got like 90rwhp
rated from ford at 100, lol your close tho...I think I'm gonna look for a 4.0 in a junkyard I think it be the easiest swap...I've hated it this summer the a/c makes it a dog...maybe gears would help
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #23  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
Originally Posted by BlackRanger93
rated from ford at 100, lol your close tho...I think I'm gonna look for a 4.0 in a junkyard I think it be the easiest swap...I've hated it this summer the a/c makes it a dog...maybe gears would help
Screw the 4.0L.. go for a V8, make it a sleeper
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #24  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
Originally Posted by bwester04
Screw the 4.0L.. go for a V8, make it a sleeper
Well I still want resonable gas mileage as this is my DD
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006
  #25  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
eh actually the 5.0L isnt gonna get too terrible of gas mileage compared a 4.0L.. way more torque though!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.