3.0's are very slow.
#29
#32
Originally Posted by l2en
Must suck to have a 3.0 or a four banger. My 4.0 is kinda slow with 33's and 4.10's.
My old 79 f150 had a 300 straight six with 200k miles, 35's, and 4.10's could give my ranger a run for it's money....I guess it is a 4.9 though.
My old 79 f150 had a 300 straight six with 200k miles, 35's, and 4.10's could give my ranger a run for it's money....I guess it is a 4.9 though.
#33
yeah the 3.0s are def slow as hell. But oh well, you get used to it. Reguardless, the engine was one of the primary reasons why i am getting a new veichle, i am so very dissapointed by the fuel economy, power, and other warrenty work i've had to do on it. If i could do it all over i wouldnt even remotely consider the 3.0 (even if it saved me a few thousand)
#35
#36
Originally Posted by bwester04
^you shoulda gotten a manual, its so much peppier than the 3.0L/auto combination..
#37
#41
Originally Posted by Fredness
Hmmm.... I don't have any problems with power. Must just be me :)
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
#42
Originally Posted by Fredness
Hmmm.... I don't have any problems with power. Must just be me :)
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
Hey are you "boss3.0"? From RPS?
I have the 3.0, i guess mine is just really quick. It was rainy out yesterday and i was going 40 and gunned it headin down the highway and the truck just started burning out. I can usually never spin tires above about 20 mph on rainy days. Maybe I'm jus lucky? Exhaust and intake combo is all i have.
But still, even tho i have a 3.0, i'd rather replace than improve. Just speaking in money terms. Having a superfast 3.0 would be awesome haha.
Aaron
#43
Originally Posted by Fredness
Hmmm.... I don't have any problems with power. Must just be me :)
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
#44
#45
i have 33's on my 2000 ranger with 3.73 gears and a 5 speed.. its a prerunner so its more for the trails and loose sand.. it gets around pretty good considering i can run 35 or 40 in first gear.. i can hold around 65 or 70 on trails in third gear.. in town i can't even touch 4th gear and at 70 on the highway in 5th is at 2 grand.. this is with 115,000 miles too..
#46
#47
Originally Posted by dangerranger
I test drove one and then just had to get a 4.0. i cant imagine the 4 banger those must be awful.
power/speed they want! They are just throwing their money away!!!
You are better off buying a vehicle that is already designed and built to be fast, then trying to add performance mods to one that isn't designed and built for it!!!
#48
Originally Posted by Fredness
Hmmm.... I don't have any problems with power. Must just be me :)
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
http://rogueperformance.com/RogueRanger.html
yeah, i didn't really buy my truck for the speed, but I still like to have it sound nice and powerful. Intake and exhaust do that. I do plan on buyin a bike though. Honda CBR600RR. Sooooo nice...
#50
Originally Posted by INT3RC3PTOR
ya know.. i have a newer 3.0, and yea it aint a fast thing, but its fine, i dont race people, an when i have er in 4low with the 35's i think it works awesome.. cause with my 32's it had almost too much torque in 4low
yes its slow.. get over bit :P
yes its slow.. get over bit :P
Did you regear?
Man my 3.slo and 33s are horrible. Its sooo slow.
I guess I notice the difference alot going from a v6 stick mustang to a ranger.
On a side note, I dont think people know what they are getting into when they buy the 3.0 vs the 4.0. To be honest, I didnt know and knowing what I know now, I would NEVER ever let anyone buy a 3.0. My brother wants a Ranger and I am trying to tell him to stay away from the 3.0 if he wants any power at all. No they arent build for racing or for power but Id like to have a lil more get up and go than I do now (and I felt the same before the lift and big tires, I just feel more strongly about it now )