2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Exhaust Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #1  
jade's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 1
From: victoria
Icon14 Exhaust Help

I am currently in the process of getting ready to put a new exhaust on my 05 stx. My buddy will be building it for me. We will be using galvanized or aluminized pipe(not sure which 1 yet, probably galvanized because we get no snow here)

We will be installing an x pipe / split rear / dual exhaust

Right now I am trying to determine what size pipe to use. Was thinking 2 - 2.5" with stainless steel magnaflow tips

Looking to see whos running what on there Rangers and what their opinions are. Thnx boyz
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #2  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
if you are trying to create a true dual system then stop right now. you will not get it to work properly and get any sort of gains from it. single in/dual out magnaflow or similar muffler is the best wy to go if you want duals. 2.5" in with dual 2" out to tips. and what engine you got?
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #3  
84FordMan's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
No bigger than 2".

2 1/4" duals robbed my Pontiac V8 of it's low-end, just think of what it will do to an already gutless 3.0L V6.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #4  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
is this truck a 3.0? i got a 2.5" into a si/do magnaflow with 2" to both tips and it sounds great and performs great. honeslty noticed a small gain in higher rpm but i doubt i lost any lower end torque. going with true duals and an x pipe is just not the way to go with a ranger
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #5  
jade's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 1
From: victoria
yes it is a 3.0
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #6  
jade's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 1
From: victoria
i see the gibson split rear exhaust is 1 and 3/4 tailpipes. Maybe that is the way to go since i am aiming for more torque as opposed to top end.
Is anone else in agreement that an x-pipe is a mistake on the 3.0L v6?

thnx
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #7  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
if you search around there have been numurous threads recently about going with true duals and an x-pipe on 4.0L engines. everyone is in agreement that even the 4.0 doesnt flow nearly enough to gain anything from the x-pipe. i dont know about 3.0L engines but i love the 2.5" exhaust on my 4.0. you should obviously go smaller.
i would search around at all th different exhaust manufacturers website like magnaflow, gibson, borla, flowmaster... and see what they offer for the 3.0. that will be the most beneficial to you to figure out proper sizing
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010
  #8  
Rapala's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
x2 dont do the true duals, it will make the 3.0 more of a dog. Go with si/do Im running 2.5 aluminum piping with 2.75 slashed tips.

100_1416.flv video by RapalaFisher - Photobucket

100_1417.flv video by RapalaFisher - Photobucket
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1994 Ranger XLT
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
13
Apr 27, 2012 03:28 PM
beefcake morris
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
11
Jul 16, 2009 12:52 PM
fordlife
General Technical & Electrical
1
Sep 23, 2008 04:13 PM
DillonT
General Ford Ranger Discussion
7
Mar 18, 2008 01:00 PM
Sonic04Edge
General Ford Ranger Discussion
25
Jun 19, 2004 10:25 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 PM.