2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Why did you buy a 3.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #26  
pastfinder's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
Longevity of the engine more than anything. Mine's over 70,000 miles and the only things I really need to do is replace two rubber hoses that have started to rot. Other than that it still runs great.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #27  
LowMaz's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Sterling/ Amherst, MA
didnt really know much about the rangers when i bought my truck. i just really liked the looks of it and it ran mint. the 5 speed is so simple to shift for a truck, you dont have to jam it into gear. the 3.0 will last a while and im used to engines lasting long since i previously owned older volvos.

people bust on 3.0s but i love it. when it needs to haul ***, its got *****. it gets good mileage for a truck and you can always have stuff in the bed. thats why i got my 3.0, plus it was cheap!
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #28  
RangerJustin's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,428
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
availability and cost...
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #29  
Ranger3.04x4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
I forgot to mention in my post but my 3.0 has a little over 130,000 miles on it with the first motor and tranny. The previous owner neglected the cooling system and my water pump went out at about 125,000 miles. I work my truck alot pulling trailers and pulling my friends out of mud holes which sometimes I feel like I own a towing service cause it seems like when someone gets stuck i'm alway's the first person they call.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #30  
graniteguy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Mark98xlt

I have a 98 3.0 and my 07 xlt with a 2.3 and 5 speed even though it has 5 hp less and not as much torque blows away driving the 3.0 just driving the 3.0 now is slow I dont even try to get on it because it takes forever and the 2.3 with the 5 spd is actually quicker and alot more fun to drive a.
Have you considered the weight difference between the single cab 2.3 and the extended cab 3.0 as being a factor in this?
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #31  
Lignite's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Nashua, MT
When I bought mine new in 02, I fought tooth and nail to get a 4.0 in it, but Ford simply did not make a 4.0/5-speed/regular cab/4x4 combo, so 3.0 it was. My dealer (brother-in-law at the time) looked high and low, and we actually had to wait for this one to roll off the assembly line. Apparently no one likes regular cabs and 5-speeds any more.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #32  
98_stepside's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: hammond indiana
the engine was the last thing that i cared about when i got my truck. all that mattered was that it ran and drove really nice. and it looked cool. i didn't buy a ranger to go fast. a ranger is the last thing i would buy to make into a race car. sure a 4.0 would be nice w/ the extra power but i dont really need it. its just my daily driver, i dont street race or anything, and with the money im not spending on the ranger im building a car that will stomp any 4.0
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #33  
rangerGT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,tx
cuz it was between the ranger a civic or chevy reg. cab...
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #34  
captain bigs's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, Florida
i bought my 3.0 cause i was contacted by my aunt who has a dealership saying hey this guy wants to sell his truck ( i knew i wanted a truck) and it just so happend i got a 2000 trailhead 3.0 truck for 5,500 and ive put about say 2k into it (only cause i just bought tires) but i still think its worth it, and it gets pretty darn good gas mileage

[edit] ohh almost forgot my engine has 90500 miles on it and still runnin like a champ
 

Last edited by captain bigs; Aug 14, 2007 at 03:41 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #35  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
Originally Posted by Ranger3.04x4
I can say that the 3.0 is the best all around motor you can get in the Ranger's in my opinion.
x2!
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #36  
joerickson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I bought the 3.0 because all of the rangers with the 4.0 were out of my price range at the time. I can't say that I'm dissapointed with the smaller engine because if I wanted a truck with more power I would have bought one with a v8.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #37  
Desert Racer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: World
Originally Posted by joerickson
I bought the 3.0 because all of the rangers with the 4.0 were out of my price range at the time. I can't say that I'm dissapointed with the smaller engine because if I wanted a truck with more power I would have bought one with a v8.

+1
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #38  
RentonRanger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Walla Walla, WA
Got mine cuz it only had 41,000 miles on it, ran like a top and looked great! Plus I got a screamin' deal on it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #39  
zainyD's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Because it's what came in the truck I bought....I actually wanted a 4.0, but I couldn't find one in a regular cab shortbed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #40  
Mark98xlt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
From: Parma Ohio
Originally Posted by graniteguy
Have you considered the weight difference between the single cab 2.3 and the extended cab 3.0 as being a factor in this?
the ext cab shouldnt be that much heavier also since the 3.0 has more hp and more torque than it should be a faster feeling truck then.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #41  
graniteguy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Mark98xlt
the ext cab shouldnt be that much heavier also since the 3.0 has more hp and more torque than it should be a faster feeling truck then.

It is that much heavier. The few 3.0 single cab Rangers I've seen at the track can keep up with a 4.0 extended cab. Weight is huge when it comes to acceleration. We are talking 50HP between 3.0 and 4.0.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2007
  #42  
mazda98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 1
From: dalton,ga.
when i bought my truck i bought it for what it was,i realy never thought about the motor,hmmmm,it ran great and served it's purpose.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #43  
bws187's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: box elder south dakota
no power

my 1999 ford ranger 4x4 xlt has no power in fifth gear why is that? do i need a bigger engine or a engine swap to a 350 chevy small block? i helpped my friend on his 87 ranger we put in a 350 in his so does anyone think it will work on mine?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #44  
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 9
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by bws187
my 1999 ford ranger 4x4 xlt has no power in fifth gear why is that? do i need a bigger engine or a engine swap to a 350 chevy small block? i helpped my friend on his 87 ranger we put in a 350 in his so does anyone think it will work on mine?
Remember the Chevy advertisement, "Like a Rock" ? It sits in your yard, and moss grows on it!!

So, if you want your truck to run, use any other manufacturer engine besides GM!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #45  
red_fx2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: lakeland, fl
didnt kno much bout rangers when i got mine, had enough power for me at the time.. was a badass little enigne.. it went through hell and back through mud,water,sand etc plus pushing 35's with stock 4.10's...w 73k on it ran the hell outta that truck.. never had a problem with it
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #46  
Steve_O113's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 1
From: Albany, OR
i dont know muck about the 3.0's but how can people say they last longer than the 4.0 SOHC? the 4.0 only been out for about 5 years....
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #47  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
^^^^^Thats why in my post I put (don't know how long they last) about the 4.0. The 3.0 has been around for 20+ years and as I said, it will go 300,000+ when properly maintained... I hope my 4.0 goes that long, but 200,000+ is good too...
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #48  
laxdominates's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: OBX, NC
I was looking for a Ranger for a great price and I found mine on a Website for 11,000 with 11,000 miles on it. Well it turns out the price was really 17,000 and I got it for 11,000 because they marked the mileage as the price so I got a huge discount because I called and bought it right away.


Its like it was meant to be!
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #49  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
Originally Posted by Steve_O113
i dont know muck about the 3.0's but how can people say they last longer than the 4.0 SOHC? the 4.0 only been out for about 5 years....
the 4.0 in general has been around a long time in rangers as well...
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007
  #50  
Steve_O113's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 1
From: Albany, OR
Originally Posted by 07SPORT
the 4.0 in general has been around a long time in rangers as well...
what i was told was that the OHC and SOHC 4.0's are totaly different engines... i know the prefore like night and day
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 PM.