4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

AEM Brute Force vs K&N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2006
  #1  
REUBER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
From: US Army
AEM Brute Force vs K&N

hey fellas,

Ive always been a K&N baby. This is my 4th Ranger and Ive had them on all. Gettin somewhere between 5-7 added HP. I was looking at the Brute Force and was wondering if any of you have this. Are there any differences? I like the aluminum instead of just plain rubber for the hose but is HP about the same? I know the filter for Brute is supposed to be cotton no oil.....Anyone have a story on this? Am I just better goin with what I know? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006
  #2  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Intakes are all the same - You will not see much of any gain on a stock motor. Get whatever looks the best that is the most inexpensive. I have a MAC, it looks good and isint too much $



 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #3  
gopher18's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
I have an Air Force One

 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #4  
Mboever's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, Iowa
Name:  IMG00030.jpg
Views: 210
Size:  95.6 KB

Here is the AEM brute force.

*Edit* hmm if i can get the picture to come up.
*Edit* got it
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #5  
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
only if thay made those for my truck...lol
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #6  
RNGMSTR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: MI, U.S.A.
intakes are not all the same, I have had several different ones installed on my truck and most were the same, all they did was look nice and make noise, not much gain. I have since put a k/n fipk kit on and it is not the same...much better throttle response, slight improvment in mpg, and not as loud. Also, the k/n uses a molded plastic tube. The metal tubes, besides being much cheaper to produce, transfer much more heat from your engine compartment. The kits that have the metal tubes, in a way, defeat the whole purpose of a "cold air intake".
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #7  
weaver79's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville, Georgia
I just go with what I know. I have used K&N in all my trucks. I have the FIPK in my Ranger, had one in my '98 also. Good product! I also have a 14"x4" round filter in my '79 F150.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #8  
gopher18's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by RNGMSTR
The kits that have the metal tubes, in a way, defeat the whole purpose of a "cold air intake".
Any kit that is taking air from inside the engine compartment is defeating the whole purpose of a "cold air intake".
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006
  #9  
RNGMSTR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 1
From: MI, U.S.A.
pretty much what I posted above!
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006
  #10  
REUBER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
From: US Army
appreciate the help guys, i think i will stick by K&N....thanks for input
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006
  #11  
Mboever's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, Iowa
I went with AEM cause I liked the idea of not haveing to oil the filter, my brother has k&n on his camaro though and they do make a very good quality product and made a huge difference for him, I think next time I may go with k&n myself, but I do like the AEM aswell.
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006
  #12  
gopher18's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by RNGMSTR
pretty much what I posted above!
was just clarifying that it's not just "metal" intake runners that are not cold air...including some K&N kits as they don't draw colder, denser outside air.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
n3elz
Suspension Tech
12
Feb 17, 2008 08:13 PM
bdiddy
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
20
May 7, 2007 12:28 PM
jdpartsman99
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
17
Aug 20, 2006 06:35 PM
Topper_Harlee
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
5
Jun 14, 2005 03:01 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 AM.