4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

headers and underdrive pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #26  
Old 04-20-2010
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The 253
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why bother with trying to get more power out of the engine? Keep it all stock so it stays reliable and re-gear the rear end. I bet going from say a 3.73 to a 4.10 will make enough of an improvement for you.
 
  #27  
Old 04-20-2010
ringer4x4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
already 4 10 from the factory
 
  #28  
Old 04-21-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
then 4.23, 4.56 5.10...
 
  #29  
Old 04-21-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
No one makes 4.23 for the Ranger axles.
 
  #30  
Old 04-21-2010
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The 253
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But they make a 4.30?
 
  #31  
Old 04-21-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Only if your 2wd, they don't make it for front axle.
 
  #32  
Old 04-21-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
No one makes 4.23 for the Ranger axles.
i seem to remember a 4.23 for the mustang carriers, but i could be wrong, i know they did make both a 4.10 and 4.11 for mustangs (for different years)
 
  #33  
Old 04-21-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes...thats not a ranger though. Common gears in Rangers are 3.73, 4.10, 4.56 and 4.88. Anything lower than that normally requires stronger axles anyway.
 
  #34  
Old 04-21-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
or portal boxes :D they take the stress off the axles, by changing the ratio further at the wheels
 
  #35  
Old 04-21-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
I am not a 4.0L Tech so I could be wrong but an internal combustion engine is nothing but an air pump; more in / more out, it is that easy !
Some motors will respond to modifications more than other but basic increases in the air in and out theory should result in gains in either torque or horse power.

When you talk increasing the air flow through the motor you will need to address the Camshaft also.
Add more air at the intake without corresponding increases in valve lift and duration and you will not see much increase.
Headers are the one thing on most engines that are restrictive enough in OEM Form so when you change to a tubular header you will see some response. How much hard to say, but you will notice the most change in HP and Torque IF you air more air in and change the cam too.
One way to make a difference in the cam lift/duration instead of changing the cam is to increasing the rocker arm ratio of the OEM Rocker Arms, adding a Roller Rocker at the same time deceases friction.
Go from say a 1.6 to a 1.7 Rocker Ratio and you effectively increase the lift of the cam which in theory should increase the torque for a seat of the pant type of response and may help on the top end HP too.

How a 4.0L will respond to these mods, IMHO… if you do all three, Intake, Cam/rockers and headers, the engine has to make more power, how much I can’t say.

p.s. Don’t forget to alter the chip or add a power chip to compensate for the extra air going through the engine.
 
  #36  
Old 04-22-2010
ringer4x4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
to me regearing not a valid opinion, after cost of gears/ supporting parts/ cost of installation no longer cost effective plus when i go to canada ( about 9 hr trip- the extra revving to me kills the mpg and reliability) other than an electric fan i don't have a aftermarket stereo, lighting, etc to draw extra and even if rather change the alternator than a motor.. i know regearing would make a difference- did in my mustang .. i know the parts i mentioned won't turn it into a street weapon ( i wish though lol ) but other than perhaps the efan don't have an adverse affect on mpg or reliabilty
 
  #37  
Old 04-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by ringer4x4
anybody have any idea how much hp headers would be worth on a 4.0 ohv? have been told 10-15 hp but i have my doubts about that unless the stock manifold are seriously restrictive- especially on a sub 200hp engine
To answer your first question:

Usually the thought has been that if you add free flowing Tubular Headers with not much else then you will bring your engine to OEM Specs, MAYBE a little more but don’t count on it.
Header and Intake improvement allow for other added performance parts to work effectively and work the way the performance part should.

Sometimes all you get from Headers and Intake Mods is added noise and some people think they are getting more POWER.
 

Last edited by Scrambler82; 04-23-2010 at 07:27 AM.
  #38  
Old 04-22-2010
kenfx4's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stoney creek, Ont
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrambler82

Sometimes all you get from Headers and Intake Mods is added noise and some people would thing they are getting more POWER.
lol like ricers
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Topdog2007
8-Cylinder Tech
0
06-28-2010 06:40 PM
Goodysgotacuda
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
6
05-17-2009 12:58 AM
MaxB
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
04-03-2008 03:39 PM
jmacmaster
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
1
06-20-2006 01:34 PM
Roach2004
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
12
10-19-2005 05:46 PM



Quick Reply: headers and underdrive pulley



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.