4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Tested the new mods. Well, kind of... LOL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #26  
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 9
From: Ohio
Have you seen a drop in Milage from removing the EGR? I lost almost 2mpg on the lightning from that alone.

Rich
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #27  
TORQUERULES's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Ripley, WV
I have seen no drop on either the Ranger or the Lightning (no EGR there either). I guess it is in the tune? I actually think that my Ranger has improved on MPG. The Lightning had no change.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007
  #28  
TORQUERULES's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Ripley, WV
I just installed wider (much wider once I had them on the truck) 265/70/16 Yokohama Geolandar HT/S tires. Maybe I'll have better traction???? LOL
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2007
  #29  
05DSG's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Southampton, Pa
nice times. 16.03 @ 93, the mph is good for atleast 14.90s.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2008
  #30  
chris.york31's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fort Benning, Ga
So if removing the egr makes the engine run rich this seems like a great "shade tree" tune for my supercharger. since i'm too poor to buy a tuner and put it on a dyno. Besides i'd rather run rich and foul plugs than lean and scorch a motor.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShadowRanger08
Snapshots
37
Dec 27, 2009 09:43 PM
FordGuy302
Snapshots
31
Apr 10, 2009 07:53 AM
Downey
Snapshots
36
Mar 31, 2009 05:57 AM
Jwad00
Member Introductions
22
Feb 5, 2008 10:46 PM
speed_racer_801
General Ford Ranger Discussion
8
Sep 4, 2006 12:37 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.