8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

v8 build. Info and recomendations needed.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-28-2010
Countryboy_94's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
v8 build. Info and recomendations needed.

What would be the best v8 build for a 2000 ranger. I already have a 351w bolted to a c4 that i planned on doing but alot of people are saying do a 302. Any help?
 
  #2  
Old 06-28-2010
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Monrovia, IN
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I recommend you keep all your questions about the same topic, in the same thread, instead of starting 3. Might help if you're trying to get answers, they'll all be in one place. I've heard of more people doing 302's than anything when doing a V8 swap. If you already have an engine, and someone who thinks they can install it.. and can handle the fabrication part of it, then stick with that. But do some research, SEARCH older posts of other users, possibly other forums. You can almost always find a build thread where someone has done the work and documented it with pictures and issues they have run into. Search and research.
 
  #3  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by Countryboy_94
What would be the best v8 build for a 2000 ranger. I already have a 351w bolted to a c4 that i planned on doing but alot of people are saying do a 302. Any help?
How did this go, is the EFI 5.0L in yet ?
 
  #4  
Old 07-22-2010
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
no, no, no. do a 4.6l dohc. that is where it's at.
 
  #5  
Old 07-22-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
no, no, no. do a 4.6l dohc. that is where it's at.
x2!!!!! The 5.0s are so overrated IMO.
 
  #6  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
x2!!!!! The 5.0s are so overrated IMO.
I don’t think the 5.0L Windsor is over rated at all, it is just that it is the only engine that Ford has that will fit the Ranger engine bay without a lot of extra work so i guess over used might work.

9 second Mustang running OEM Blocks is not over rating anything, the potential is there.

The 4.6 is SWEET but fitting it is a lot harder, although I have thought about it too.
 
  #7  
Old 07-22-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
210-hp, 4.0-liter V-6 (regular gas)
215-hp, 5.0-liter V-8 (regular gas)

That is way to much work for 5 horses. If I'm already pulling the engine might as well do something worthwhile. But again thats just my opinion.
 
  #8  
Old 07-22-2010
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Beaver Falls, PA
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
you also gotta remember trent there is alot more potential in the 5.0s. Ya it might be alot of work but if the time and the money is taken its soo worth it.
 
  #9  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
210-hp, 4.0-liter V-6 (regular gas)
215-hp, 5.0-liter V-8 (regular gas)

That is way to much work for 5 horses. If I'm already pulling the engine might as well do something worthwhile. But again thats just my opinion.
TORQUE man ! that is what moves the vehicle and HP is what keeps it going.

More torque the easier the vehicle gets started and the better the response feels when driving.
Off Roading is all about TORQUE not HP.

That is why the V-8 Swap is a GOOD thing !

As soon as I find out about the MA Laws I will be looking into a swap too, and yes a 5.0L EFI if possible.
 
  #10  
Old 07-22-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
 
  #11  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
That’s my worry, I need to find out first.
So I might just be able to put in a 4.6L, thinking, big smoke...
A 4.6, nice, a Cobra 4.6 nicer still but the work involved, not sure if it is worth it.

ltr
 
  #12  
Old 07-22-2010
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Beaver Falls, PA
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
well ya if you wanna go down that road there are motors with more potential than a 5.0. But the 5.0 is prolly the easiest (and i use the term loosely) V8 swap out there for a ranger.
 
  #13  
Old 07-22-2010
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I agree with you there on that part
 
  #14  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
There is a stroker kit for the 4.6L to make it a 5.0L; that would increase the stroke from 2.8 to 3.0 inches, now I bet that would be nice.
 
  #15  
Old 07-22-2010
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrambler82
There is a stroker kit for the 4.6L to make it a 5.0L; that would increase the stroke from 2.8 to 3.0 inches, now I bet that would be nice.
err...add 1inch to that stroke size....
 
  #16  
Old 07-22-2010
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,909
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
err...add 1inch to that stroke size....
I was thinking the old 5.0L way, the 4.6 has a smaller bore 3.5” and a 3.5” stroke.

While the 5.0L had a 4” Bore and a 3.0” stroke; there are a lot more differences in these engines than what I thought.

Good catch…

What do they do to a 4.6L to make a 5.0L, stroke it and open up the bore ?

Interesting.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OneTireFire
General Ford Ranger Discussion
3
04-15-2010 06:34 AM
4X41AB
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
06-22-2008 08:14 PM
jtslmn720
General Ford Ranger Discussion
24
11-28-2007 11:50 AM
JP03RFX4
General Technical & Electrical
7
01-31-2007 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: v8 build. Info and recomendations needed.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 PM.