8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

v8 build. Info and recomendations needed.

Old Jun 28, 2010
  #1  
Countryboy_94's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
v8 build. Info and recomendations needed.

What would be the best v8 build for a 2000 ranger. I already have a 351w bolted to a c4 that i planned on doing but alot of people are saying do a 302. Any help?
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010
  #2  
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 2
From: Monrovia, IN
I recommend you keep all your questions about the same topic, in the same thread, instead of starting 3. Might help if you're trying to get answers, they'll all be in one place. I've heard of more people doing 302's than anything when doing a V8 swap. If you already have an engine, and someone who thinks they can install it.. and can handle the fabrication part of it, then stick with that. But do some research, SEARCH older posts of other users, possibly other forums. You can almost always find a build thread where someone has done the work and documented it with pictures and issues they have run into. Search and research.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #3  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Countryboy_94
What would be the best v8 build for a 2000 ranger. I already have a 351w bolted to a c4 that i planned on doing but alot of people are saying do a 302. Any help?
How did this go, is the EFI 5.0L in yet ?
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #4  
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 2
From: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
no, no, no. do a 4.6l dohc. that is where it's at.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #5  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
no, no, no. do a 4.6l dohc. that is where it's at.
x2!!!!! The 5.0s are so overrated IMO.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #6  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
x2!!!!! The 5.0s are so overrated IMO.
I don’t think the 5.0L Windsor is over rated at all, it is just that it is the only engine that Ford has that will fit the Ranger engine bay without a lot of extra work so i guess over used might work.

9 second Mustang running OEM Blocks is not over rating anything, the potential is there.

The 4.6 is SWEET but fitting it is a lot harder, although I have thought about it too.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #7  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
210-hp, 4.0-liter V-6 (regular gas)
215-hp, 5.0-liter V-8 (regular gas)

That is way to much work for 5 horses. If I'm already pulling the engine might as well do something worthwhile. But again thats just my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #8  
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
you also gotta remember trent there is alot more potential in the 5.0s. Ya it might be alot of work but if the time and the money is taken its soo worth it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #9  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
210-hp, 4.0-liter V-6 (regular gas)
215-hp, 5.0-liter V-8 (regular gas)

That is way to much work for 5 horses. If I'm already pulling the engine might as well do something worthwhile. But again thats just my opinion.
TORQUE man ! that is what moves the vehicle and HP is what keeps it going.

More torque the easier the vehicle gets started and the better the response feels when driving.
Off Roading is all about TORQUE not HP.

That is why the V-8 Swap is a GOOD thing !

As soon as I find out about the MA Laws I will be looking into a swap too, and yes a 5.0L EFI if possible.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #10  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #11  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
That’s my worry, I need to find out first.
So I might just be able to put in a 4.6L, thinking, big smoke...
A 4.6, nice, a Cobra 4.6 nicer still but the work involved, not sure if it is worth it.

ltr
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #12  
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
well ya if you wanna go down that road there are motors with more potential than a 5.0. But the 5.0 is prolly the easiest (and i use the term loosely) V8 swap out there for a ranger.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #13  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
I agree with you there on that part
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #14  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I know, I couldn't find consistent torque numbers though to compare the two. There is way more potential in a 4.6 than a 5.0 if you guys want to talk that game. In NC you have to use the same year or newer engine anyway to pass inspection so the 5.0 isn't a option for many vehicles.
There is a stroker kit for the 4.6L to make it a 5.0L; that would increase the stroke from 2.8 to 3.0 inches, now I bet that would be nice.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #15  
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 2
From: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
Originally Posted by Scrambler82
There is a stroker kit for the 4.6L to make it a 5.0L; that would increase the stroke from 2.8 to 3.0 inches, now I bet that would be nice.
err...add 1inch to that stroke size....
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2010
  #16  
Scrambler82's Avatar
Old Guy User…
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,909
Likes: 78
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
err...add 1inch to that stroke size....
I was thinking the old 5.0L way, the 4.6 has a smaller bore 3.5” and a 3.5” stroke.

While the 5.0L had a 4” Bore and a 3.0” stroke; there are a lot more differences in these engines than what I thought.

Good catch…

What do they do to a 4.6L to make a 5.0L, stroke it and open up the bore ?

Interesting.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OneTireFire
General Ford Ranger Discussion
3
Apr 15, 2010 06:34 AM
4X41AB
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
Jun 22, 2008 08:14 PM
jtslmn720
General Ford Ranger Discussion
24
Nov 28, 2007 11:50 AM
JP03RFX4
General Technical & Electrical
7
Jan 31, 2007 02:13 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 AM.