Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

'95-'01 Explorer Front Drivetrain Compatability

Old Feb 17, 2010
  #1  
icthusrulz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Washington
'95-'01 Explorer Front Drivetrain Compatability

So I've found some RBV IFS (not TTB) 4WD Explorers at the junkyard and was wanting to know if there is any reason the parts will not work for a 4x2 to 4x4 conversion? I'm talking from the front drive shaft forward, front axle, CVs, hubs, etc.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #2  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Depending on the year the front driveshaft may not work, just check to make sure the t-case side has the correct flange for your application. Also make sure and check the axle for the center axle disconnect cause you don't want it if it has that.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #3  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
@Ryan/Razor... I think just the '95 Explorer isn't the one to pull parts off of. Something with the front axle makes them very undesirable.

Otherwise, virtually all of it is usable on a Ranger. They're live axle. Most if not all the parts needed for your swap can come from a 95-01 Explorer. I still think using Ranger 03+ Knuckles is a better choice for their 12" rotors though since you've gotta get some knuckles anyway.

Ryan noted on the front shaft.... 97 and prior tcases have a double cardon front shaft. 98+ cases have that stupid CV design. If you choose manual tcase, it's 98% likely you'll be getting a 97 and earlier case because the 02-03 fx4 twin stick cases are uuber rare to find. You'd want to have a cooresponding shaft, 95-97 Explorer front shaft for the double cardon and the IFS just like the Ranger.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #4  
icthusrulz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Can't I just leave it locked if it has the disconnect?

Also, are there any axle width problems?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #5  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
The front axle disconnect ended in either 95 or 96.
Aside from that and possible driveshaft changes, everything forward is the same.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #6  
icthusrulz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Washington
As far as axle disconnects go, I think it is the full time 4WD Explorers ('95-'96) and all '97-'01('03) that don't have them, while the part-time 4WD Explorers ('95-'96) do. At lest according to car-part.com
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #7  
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 6
From: Muncy, PA
dont the 97 up explorers have the auto tcase too
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #8  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Most 95-97(and all 98+) expos are electric shift cases. But there were a few manual tcases too. That doesn't matter though...even the early(95-97) electric shift cases in expos have the same front output as the manual 1354 cases. All 98+, regardless of Ranger or Explorer, got the CV front shaft with the bucket/tulip on the front output.

1354's are found on all 90+'s and 1354M's lasted from 90-97, 02-03.

BUT...I suggest using a 95-97 Expo shaft since they're the proper length for a 98+ IFS Ranger when using the up to '97 tcase. TTB front shafts...while they have the same double cardon as the 95-97 Expo's, they are too long of a shaft for a 98+ IFS. Shortening would be required.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #9  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,876
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by icthusrulz
Can't I just leave it locked if it has the disconnect?
I would avoid the headaches involved with that. Non-CAD axles are much more common so you shouldn't have any trouble finding one.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #10  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
^^and more reliable. One less BS thing to break on ya. Went through 2 of those disco axles in my cherokee til I found a non-disco d30.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010
  #11  
Blhde's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 6
From: Northern IL
The 95 explorers have a disconnect on the pass side axle. Its part of the automatic electronic 4wd system.

Im not sure what years have this auto option. Or how they did it in different years. I do have a 95 with this odd hosed boxed on the housing. So I know its an issue.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
afi_pilot85
General Technical & Electrical
15
Jan 16, 2016 12:22 PM
t5cents
Drivetrain Tech
1
Jan 15, 2011 02:30 PM
ranger_banger
General Technical & Electrical
5
Jan 31, 2008 03:04 PM
therangerofdanger
Exterior Semi-Tech
10
Dec 29, 2007 04:18 PM
afi_pilot85
Suspension Tech
11
Oct 18, 2005 11:24 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.