Forced Induction & N20 Tech General discussion of forced induction and nitrous for the Ford Ranger.

2005 Turbo and N2O ranger build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #26  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Got it running night before last. Still lots to do on it, but less to do than when i started...
















 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #27  
fishy2k8's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 3
From: Avon, IN
dude this build is sweet! now.. question, might be a silly one.. with the maf, i've always seen the maf before the turbo, not on the ic piping.. whats the difference? or does it matter?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #28  
rstangboi's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
From: Davis, Ca
why hello zero ground clearance

lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #29  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Looks great! I agree about everything hanging very low. Guess it will be fine as long as they don't hit something.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #30  
edgeman4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
From: All Over
is an intercooler of that proportion really needed on this application?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #31  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
someone needs to do this to a 3.0L ;-)
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #32  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by fishy2k8
dude this build is sweet! now.. question, might be a silly one.. with the maf, i've always seen the maf before the turbo, not on the ic piping.. whats the difference? or does it matter?
its called a "blow through" setup. You can do this, it just limits the maf's range. Tuneability is a little easier with the bov before the maf when its vented to the atmosphere.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #33  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by rstangboi
why hello zero ground clearance

lol
it wont be as bad as it looks...
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #34  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by edgeman4.0
is an intercooler of that proportion really needed on this application?
yes it is... if it doesnt make the numbers we are shooting for, we wont have to upgrade the cooler, just the turbo. if it does make the numbers we are looking for, we will just benefit from cooler charge temps, plus less pressure drop across it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #35  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by GrafixGuy
someone needs to do this to a 3.0L ;-)
bring it to me :-)
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2010
  #36  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by NicksterSVT
its called a "blow through" setup. You can do this, it just limits the maf's range. Tuneability is a little easier with the bov before the maf when its vented to the atmosphere.
correct - system goes rich between shifts when you have it vta and it is on the negative pressure side.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #37  
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2
From: South Detroit.
cool idea about the EE plenum but why give yourself the added weight?
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #38  
tractorman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Well now he can't take his 4wd truck off road.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #39  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by morris
cool idea about the EE plenum but why give yourself the added weight?
added weight? added weight of what? the intake setup? it lost the weight of the intake when i took the fan off of it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #40  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by tractorman
Well now he can't take his 4wd truck off road.


its a 2005 with 20k miles on it... still the original tires... how much off roading do you think this truck will see??


come on guys, be realistic, i told you in the beginning of the thread that i didnt have time for a bunch of questions. i guess ill just start picking and choosing the ones to answer....
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #41  
tractorman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 1
From: Wisconsin
Too bad that wasn't a question, smart ***. Don't a be a dick.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #42  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by tractorman
Too bad that wasn't a question, smart ***. Don't a be a dick.
never said it was a question, dumbass. dont be a moron.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #43  
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2
From: South Detroit.
i understood you gutted the supercharger. i don't know how much the stock intake and that one weighs.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #44  
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 2
From: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
Originally Posted by NicksterSVT
never said it was a question, dumbass. dont be a moron.
All i have to sat is powed.




Good build up. this thing looks sweet. Can't wait to see more of it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #45  
87xlt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 876
Likes: 3
From: In my truck!
Yea sick is the proper word here!
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #46  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by morris
i understood you gutted the supercharger. i don't know how much the stock intake and that one weighs.
its not the fact that it weighs like 3 lbs more than the stock intake. have you looked at your tb lately? and the small runners in the intake? plus its plastic... nitrous and boost arent the best thing for a plastic intake, plus this thing is running a 3 inch charge pipe, it would be retarded to try to cram all that air into a 65mm tb.

im not being a jackass, just trying to make things clear.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #47  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Got it running fairly decent tonight, gotta get the wideband hooked up on it tomorrow... everything works pretty well for a prototype... Hopefully tomorrow night there will be a road test.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #48  
btm757's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,980
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk / Chesapeake, VA
Looks great man
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #49  
fourliter dan's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 1
From: Lebanon, OR
estimated power?
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010
  #50  
NicksterSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by fourliter dan
estimated power?
at least 200hp. lol
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM.