2011 Ford F-150 Comparison: V-6 vs V-8 - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


General Ford Discussion General discussion of Ford vehicles not pertaining to the Ford Ranger.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-26-2011
KLC's Avatar
KLC KLC is offline
RF Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
2011 Ford F-150 Comparison: V-6 vs V-8

2011 Ford F-150 Comparison: V-6 vs V-8
Brains Vs Brawn: What's Better -- High Tech or Big Displacement?

From the October, 2011 issue of Truck Trend / By Allyson Harwood



When this generation of Ford's F-150 was introduced for the 2009 model year, it was impressive enough to win Motor Trend's Truck of the Year honors. That was despite its one big downside: an aging lineup of engines, all three of which were V-8s. They included a two-valve, 248-horsepower, 294-pound-foot 4.6-liter V-8; another 4.6-liter V-8 with three valves per cylinder that put out 292 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque; and a 5.4-liter V-8 offering 310 horsepower and 365 pound-feet. Making things worse, the two-valve -- was backed by a four-speed automatic, and fuel economy wasn't good enough. Many different clues pointed to the same conclusion: It was time for new engines.

Fast-forward two model years, and all three V-8s have been swept aside. In their place are two V-6s and two V-8s, all with variable valve timing. All but one (the 6.2) feature all-aluminum construction, and all are backed by the same six-speed automatic. Fuel economy has improved across the board, except for the 6.2. And in what seems a major contradiction, power has increased as well: Even the base V-6 has more horsepower than the three-valve 4.6-liter, falling only 8 shy of the 5.4.

We wanted to know how these new engines perform, so we wrangled together four F-150s with four different attitudes: a 3.7-liter-V-6-powered regular cab STX, a 5.0-liter SuperCrew XLT, a 6.2-liter Harley-Davidson Edition SuperCrew, and a 3.5-liter EcoBoost SuperCrew Lariat. We took the quartet to the track in El Toro, California; on the road; and to the dyno at K&N Engineering, to see how the F-150 fares with the new engines. We also wanted to find out if the horsepower, torque, and fuel economy data match up with the manufacturer's numbers, and whether it makes sense to get a twin-turbo V-6 instead of a good old American V-8.

What The Dynomometer Tells Us

3.7-liter: V-6 The peaks and dips in the 3.7-liter V-6's torque curve were consistent in every dyno run. Torque peaked initially at 2400 rpm, then fell off and began climbing again to another peak at 4200 rpm. While previous engines would produce peak torque and then fall off, Ford's extra efforts in variable valve timing, Ti-VCT, has made the engine more efficient across the rpm range.

5.0-liter: V-8 As on the 3.7-liter V-6, the use of Ti-VCT spreads out the torque curve. While smoother on the V-8, definite peaks are apparent on the graph; unlike with the V-6, they are barely noticeable in real-world driving. While not the fastest truck in the test, the quickly climbing power curve makes it feel fast on the street. Downside is the need for higher-rpm operation when towing.

EcoBoost: The dyno doesn't provide enough resistance to get a realistic torque reading at the low end of the chart. The EcoBoost can accelerate past 2000 rpm before the turbos are producing full boost. On the road, with more resistance, the truck would likely produce more torque than indicated below 2000 rpm. The later spool-up also means less heat in the beginning of the dyno run, so the torque beyond that point might be slightly inflated.

6.2-liter: V-8 Based on a different, older family of engines than the 5.0-liter V-8, power and torque curves are nearly identical in shape on the 6.2-liter, just farther up the graph. Torque builds quickly below 3000 rpm, levels out, then starts to run up again up to a peak at 4500 rpm. On dyno and road, the V-8's behavior could be called angry. While EcoBoost and Coyote V-8 are silky smooth, the boss wants to jump out of the truck and bite someone at wide open throttle.

Torque: The torque curves for all four engines are fairly flat. The EcoBoost has the best of all worlds: flat curve, most torque, and lowest rpm at which peak torque was achieved.

Horsepower: EcoBoost engine had most power on the dynomometer, followed closely by the 6.2L, then the 5.0L, with the 3.7L closing.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2011
Fink132's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 758
Very interesting.
That ecoboost is quite the engine though. My uncle has a newish Ford Flex with the ecoboost engine, and it is FAST
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2011
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5,030
The EcoBoost is a very nice engine like it says the torque is evenly spread out along with the 5.0 they basically feel the same. Sometimes i cant even tell the difference. The 6.2 is very angry like it says and its just whole different animal
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2011
dixie_boysles's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 3,778
i wants ecoboost
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2011
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixie_boysles View Post
i wants ecoboost
you wouldn't
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2011
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,650
I haven't driven the ecoboost yet but the 6.2l is just a freaking beast. I don't know if I would enjoy the ecoboost the same way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2011
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,045
I want to drive both, yet at the same time I better stay home. haha
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2011
JoshK's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CC, Indiana
Posts: 3,832
Ive came to the conclusion I will never buy anything newer then 2005 lol
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2011
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER

iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by zabeard View Post
I want to drive both, yet at the same time I better stay home. haha
Yea you'd come home with something
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-28-2011
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by zabeard View Post
I want to drive both, yet at the same time I better stay home. haha
Do it! You know you wanna...

Then sell me your F150
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-30-2011
xp1ik99's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lexington Park, MD
Posts: 3,230
drove an eco boost when i bought my truck and if they wernt so damn expensive id have one in my driveway now, simply amazing, a truck shouldnt be that fast, still havent experienced a 6.2 but kinda want to but at the same time dont want to......stupid 5.4 lol
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-01-2011
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
Veteran Status Achieved
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesooooota
Posts: 8,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshK View Post
Ive came to the conclusion I will never buy anything newer then 2005 lol
hahahaa... I know what you mean!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XCAL 2 and 2011 F-150 Lord Of War General Ford Ranger Discussion 3 12-05-2011 08:28 AM
Ford Introduces Three New Light-Duty Engines for 2011 F-150 brianjwilson General Ford Discussion 43 09-29-2010 06:30 PM
Ford F-150 EcoBoost 2011 will take on the demanding Tecate SCORE Baja 1000 Blhde General Ford Discussion 0 09-24-2010 07:50 AM
Ecoboost going in the 2011 F-150 04blackedge General Ford Discussion 6 04-12-2010 09:17 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.