Dyno Results....
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 10
From: Long Beach CA
Dyno Results....
I just got my truck back from the shop with some BASELINE Dyno numbers.
1999 4.0 OHV Auto 4X4
Both numbers at the wheels on a DynoJet
HP ~ 128
TQ ~ 180 foot lbs
Not to shabby for bone stock...cant wait to get the Mod's back on and see what they actually do...
If somebodys got the STOCK numbers for a SOHC please post em if you would.. ::caugh::Jared::caugh::
:)
1999 4.0 OHV Auto 4X4
Both numbers at the wheels on a DynoJet
HP ~ 128
TQ ~ 180 foot lbs
Not to shabby for bone stock...cant wait to get the Mod's back on and see what they actually do...
If somebodys got the STOCK numbers for a SOHC please post em if you would.. ::caugh::Jared::caugh::
:)
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 10
From: Long Beach CA
Originally Posted by FoMoCoEdge
Spelled "COUGH" wrong..
I will take a pic of the dyno sheets in a bit.
I was told that Jared dynoed at 135... 175 wouldnt be bad and would be a much more realistic number but what I really care about is the Torque, Torque moves metal right... :D
(dont forget were not comparing apples to apples, OHV has 50 less HP right off the bat)
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 10
From: Long Beach CA
Originally Posted by FoMoCoEdge
lol, i know...
If Jared dyno'ed 135, im flying to cali to slap him...
If Jared dyno'ed 135, im flying to cali to slap him...
I was thinkin about this while I was eating dinner and relized that saying those numbers are "good" probably wasnt the best without adding that I'm saying that they are good for that motor with 107,000 miles on it. My goal with moding this thing is Torque, I dont race or speed to often so HP really doesnt mean much, but I'll race anybody up a hill offroad and thats where Torque helps out. So yea... thats it. I'm just happy I beat those pesky 3.0's...lol
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 10
From: Long Beach CA
Originally Posted by TheForce02
well when K&N dynoed my ranger i had
128.6hp stock
after K&N i should have 137.1
remember i have a 3.slow
128.6hp stock
after K&N i should have 137.1
remember i have a 3.slow
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,664
Likes: 1
From: Danville, VA
3.slow < 4.go
i have no idea what i'm sittin at as far as horsepower goes, but i know my buddy with his modded 3.0 cant keep up, and his is a 4x2, 3.73 gears, single cab stepside...he has the total weight advantage too.
just keep moddin it...remember, we're trucks....not lambo's....dont try to overdo it, keep it realistic
i have no idea what i'm sittin at as far as horsepower goes, but i know my buddy with his modded 3.0 cant keep up, and his is a 4x2, 3.73 gears, single cab stepside...he has the total weight advantage too.
just keep moddin it...remember, we're trucks....not lambo's....dont try to overdo it, keep it realistic
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
Originally Posted by Dave and Julie
Torque is the only thing the dyno can measure. Horsepower is a calculation.
It is related to RPM and you can only directly measure it, so-to-speak, at 5252 RPM where torque=HP.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
