new average fuel economy numbers - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-23-2007
LILBLUE04FX4L2's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Exit 105 New Jersey
Posts: 2,409
new average fuel economy numbers

the Ranger - along with most other models across all brands now reports lower MPG both city and highway

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2007
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,045
because of ethanol maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2007
volcompro11's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 70
I've always heard the EPA MPG estimates were overly generous, a new car rarely gets the MPG the sticker advertises.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2007
TommyC's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by zabeard
because of ethanol maybe?

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ratings2008.shtml
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2007
bwester04's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 2,641
so now, we can actually get better mileage than EPA suggests..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2007
greygooseranger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 3,293
Its no surprise, the stickers were way off on allot of vehicles....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2007
Victory's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pawcatuck, CT
Posts: 219
The new testing is not required till the 2008 models. Will the numbers change then? The old test was at a constant speed and who drives like that? I wonder if the new test has the speed up to pass the car in front and then slow down to below what the other car was doing? Does it include passing 3 cars using the right lane then taking the next exit?
Do drivers think not using their trun signals gets better mileage?
I have always gotten better by 2 or 3 mpg than the sticker till my 4x4. It said 19 and that's what I get. Now the new test says 18 so I am getting 1 better.
Now to see if my brakes last over 100,000 miles before the first brake job on the 4x4? Only time and miles will tell.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Part numbers/crossover numbers DD430 General Technical & Electrical 4 03-28-2011 06:25 AM
Fuel Economy jaycheetwood 4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech 1 09-15-2008 10:21 AM
Fuel Economy has vanished...time to replace things.. pastfinder 2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech 3 04-22-2007 01:03 PM
better fuel economy? GubNi SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines 7 01-21-2007 01:26 PM
Miracle for Fuel Economy? jrodhotrod General Ford Ranger Discussion 49 09-26-2005 08:47 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.