General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Ranger Generation (Difference) Question

  #1  
Old 03-01-2012
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 48
Ranger Generation (Difference) Question

Hello, I've been looking for a 2002+ 4.0L Ranger with manual transmission but I haven't had much luck yet. I found a pretty good deal on a 2000 4.0L with manual transmission and I wanted to know if I should go with a 2000 or stick with a 2002? I remember someone talking about how the 2002 Rangers are better than the 2000 but I can't remember why. Does anyone know the difference between the two? Thanks!

M
 
  #2  
Old 03-01-2012
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,876
2000 4.0 is a different motor than the 02 4.0
 
  #3  
Old 03-01-2012
06RangerXLT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Halton Hills, Ont
Posts: 1,685
yup.
 
  #4  
Old 03-01-2012
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 48
Is that a bad thing?
 
  #5  
Old 03-01-2012
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,876
nope...01+ 4.0s have more power due to them being OHC rather than pushrod
 
  #6  
Old 03-01-2012
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 48
So the 2000 4.0L Ranger has timing chain instead of timing belt?
 
  #7  
Old 03-01-2012
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,876
all v6 rangers have timing chains
 
  #8  
Old 03-01-2012
StxDangerRanger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
Posts: 6,313
I thought that OHV was 93-00, and a 4.0 OHC was introduced in 01 (which had the timing chain problem)
 
  #9  
Old 03-01-2012
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 48
Ah, I did not know that. Thanks. If you find a deal on the 2000 Ranger 4.0L manual, would you hesitate to buy it?
 
  #10  
Old 03-01-2012
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,876
hell no...the OHV 4.0 is a great motor
 
  #11  
Old 03-01-2012
StxDangerRanger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Flat Rock, Mi
Posts: 6,313
Originally Posted by djfllmn View Post
hell no...the OHV 4.0 is a great motor
Case in point.
Mine just recently hit 175k. The only things that have been replaced:
Drivers side Valve cover (they tend to leak)
Lower intake gasket (they tend to fail after 17 years)
Plus a few things associated with a Lower intake job (passenger valve cover gasket, upper intake gasket)

The OHV motors were (still are) great was because the lower end (block and heads) are almost bullet proof. Solid Lifters (not hydraulic) won't ever fail you and there is less that can go wrong with something that old.
 
  #12  
Old 03-02-2012
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 48
2000 Ford Ranger 4.0L, manual transmission, 2WD, two doors with 130k miles for $4200. Good deal?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tom kalmanidis
Suspension Tech
4
10-14-2009 06:51 PM
Dalmatian90
General Ford Ranger Discussion
2
08-27-2009 09:55 AM
morris
General Ford Ranger Discussion
9
04-08-2008 06:12 AM
mjtonon
General Ford Ranger Discussion
1
02-02-2005 05:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Ranger Generation (Difference) Question


Contact Us - Sitemap - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.