View Poll Results: What is your engine
2.0
0
0%
2.5
5
1.91%
2.3 (01+)
4
1.53%
2.3 lima
12
4.58%
Diesel
1
0.38%
2.8
1
0.38%
2.9
0
0%
3.0
85
32.44%
4.0
147
56.11%
5.0
5
1.91%
58
1
0.38%
other swapped
1
0.38%
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll
what is your engine size
#76
10-05-2006
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#77
10-05-2006
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NE, OH
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#78
10-05-2006
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#79
10-09-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#80
10-09-2006
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#81
10-09-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#84
10-12-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kaltorok
I am concidering buying a ford ranger and was wondering what are the pro's and con's the 3.0 and the 4.0 motors?
try starting in a new thread next time
3.0 -- decent gas mileage, lacks the massive amount of ballz that most people like
4.0 -- ok gas mileage, more than enought power
#86
10-19-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#87
10-19-2006
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Demorest,Ga
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3.0 -- decent gas mileage, lacks the massive amount of ballz that most people like
4.0 -- ok gas mileage, more than enought power
4.0 -- ok gas mileage, more than enought power
#88
10-20-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthernMudSlinger
With a 3.0, you dont get power or gas mileage, so its a lose lose situation. lol Is that true? They dont have much more power than the 4cyl, but yet they dont get great gas mileage either. I'd want either the power, or gas mileage, not a little bit of both.
#90
10-23-2006
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mandeville, Louisiana
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#91
10-23-2006
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mandeville, Louisiana
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#92
10-23-2006
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#93
10-23-2006
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Demorest,Ga
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how sad, there are only 16 4 cyl trucks on this site out of 180!!!!!
The 4 cyl.'s acceleration really isn't that bad, specially since I can get 23 mpg without even trying, its a whole lot better than the 11 mpg my old truck got, and it wasn't any faster than my ranger, and it was a V8! lol
I wish i had a 4.0 over this 3.0. The 3.0 doesn't get great gas milage and it doesn't have lots of power. Knowing what i know now i would have either got the 4 banger or the 4.0.
#94
10-23-2006
#97
10-23-2006
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Demorest,Ga
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#99
11-25-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
