4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

How much HP did I gain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #1  
Trigger01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
How much HP did I gain?

I did search and didn't find what I was looking for.

How much HP did I/ should I have gained when I added the Bama Xcal. to my truck? I have it set on the 87 performance setting.

Thanks,
-Mike
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #2  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
11nty billion horse power!

j/k i am not sure but i would like to know i am gonna get some soon
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007
  #3  
dlibson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Probably about 10-15 Horse.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007
  #4  
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 5
From: Kent State, Kent Ohio
the 2.3 dura gained 13hp if i rember right and they expected more out of the v6;'s
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007
  #5  
HarryTasker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
the 87 perf tune won't give a huge gain, maybe 5hp if that. There wasn't anything changed that would increase the HP, it just optimized the current configuration. Now if you put in the 91+ octane tune you would see a difference. Next i would suggest an intake and exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007
  #6  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
On a stock 4.0 on premium you get about 17hp/15tq based off bama... Probably more like 20-25hp/20-25tq with intake and exhaust from the tuner alone. Plus whatever extra you got from the intake and exhaust. Thats to the wheel. To the crank with intake exhaust and chip you probably get about 30-45hp/30-50tq.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007
  #7  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
That 20-25 plus number in both categories is making me want one bad.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007
  #8  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by Lord Of War
That 20-25 plus number in both categories is making me want one bad.
No sh*t, me too!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007
  #9  
Trigger01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by HarryTasker
the 87 perf tune won't give a huge gain, maybe 5hp if that. There wasn't anything changed that would increase the HP, it just optimized the current configuration. Now if you put in the 91+ octane tune you would see a difference. Next i would suggest an intake and exhaust.
An intke will probably happen again someday, no time soon though. I already have exhaust.

Anybody else wanna guess a number, I've gotten abunch of different numbers so far...
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007
  #10  
HarryTasker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by IR0NS1N
On a stock 4.0 on premium you get about 17hp/15tq based off bama... Probably more like 20-25hp/20-25tq with intake and exhaust from the tuner alone. Plus whatever extra you got from the intake and exhaust. Thats to the wheel. To the crank with intake exhaust and chip you probably get about 30-45hp/30-50tq.
This was the only dyno information I have see on Bamachips website. and it is for the 2.3 4 cyl.

"On a dynojet dyno I've seen gains of 10 rwhp and 17 rwtq with just a standard 87 tune! When we were finished we had made more RWTQ then a stock 3.0 V6 with this engine on a manuak 2002 Mazda B2300."
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #11  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by HarryTasker
This was the only dyno information I have see on Bamachips website. and it is for the 2.3 4 cyl.

"On a dynojet dyno I've seen gains of 10 rwhp and 17 rwtq with just a standard 87 tune! When we were finished we had made more RWTQ then a stock 3.0 V6 with this engine on a manuak 2002 Mazda B2300."
Actually check this out

And I quote "On a mail order tune I've made numbers in the 195 rwhp and 218 rwtq, improved from the stock 178rwhp and 203 rwtq. Now dyno tuned I've made 200rwhp and 223 rwtq but I was there and made some adjustments that I couldn't do without a a/f readout."

Thats on 91...
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #12  
Trigger01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
That's not on the 4.0 That's the 3.0 I believe.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #13  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
No the 3.0 has 148hp, it will not make 178hp stock... Its the 4.0...
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #14  
Trigger01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
The 4.0 has 207 hp stock.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #15  
4x4 EDGE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Lyons, NY
the 4.0 has 207hp at the crank. He's talking about at the wheels thats why its lower.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #16  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
Originally Posted by IR0NS1N
On a stock 4.0 on premium you get about 17hp/15tq based off bama... Probably more like 20-25hp/20-25tq with intake and exhaust from the tuner alone. Plus whatever extra you got from the intake and exhaust. Thats to the wheel. To the crank with intake exhaust and chip you probably get about 30-45hp/30-50tq.
hope that clears it up for you.. However on 87 performance the only thing ive seen is for the 4cylinder. But to the rear wheel the 4.0 gets a 17/15 increase according to doug. I would guess you'd get another 5-8/5-8 to the wheels with intake an exhaust... maybe more even.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #17  
Trigger01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
Oh.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007
  #18  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
Anyway, when you think about it, when you fill up on 91 you pay maybe 2-4 bucks more a fillup, but if you get 2-4mpg better cause of a 91 torque tune and keep ur foot out of it, you really save up money. I dont mind the extra money at the pump for the extra power.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scrambler82
General Technical & Electrical
22
May 16, 2011 08:22 PM
Blackhawk
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
Jul 27, 2007 10:25 PM
jmacmaster
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
1
Jun 20, 2006 01:34 PM
fastev
Audio & Video Tech
8
May 28, 2005 09:50 PM
GrafixGuy
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
8
Mar 9, 2005 12:55 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 AM.