Took the truck on the track!
 

Not the first time up at the track but the first with the ranger. did well for what it is LMAO. All my runs were extremely consistant all 16.2 with 16.5 being the slowest 2wd launch spun hard. But over all i had a great night. have some pics and a vid tires screamed the entire track guy on the loud speaker "listen to that fellas tires roar" got a kick outta it lol. but on to the knock off/ loose list ill scan race slips tomorrow

Wins for me
06 Monte Carlo SS
99 3.0 Ranger XLT
Civic turbo (broke axle launching)
Chrysler Town and Country

Losses
07 STI
7.3 PSD
6.0 PSD (blacked out the track)
Jeep SRT8
Audi S8 V10
Small lambo idk what there called ran 11.88

On the way there
http://i650.photobucket.com/albums/u...s/IMG_6199.jpg
Avoiding the water box
Attachment 79027
Best run of the night (tires so loud)
Time slip for that run
Attachment 79028

Something must have been wrong with the Monte Carlo SS. I don't know anything about them, but i'd assume they are faster then a Ranger.

I like how the "Civic turbo (broke axle launching) " counts as a win. lol

Plus nice on the amount of times you got to run. I love how the slip shows what car's are what. Or at least maker. It makes it less likely to bullshit someone into thinking you are faster than you really are.

Good to see you still got your truck. I cant believe you even took it to the track and take a chance on breaking it with all the problems you have seemed to have with it lol.

Thought you were getting rid of it?

Winning is winning

Times where very consistent. The slip says Ford and Amelia or what ever and those are the lane sponsors. Look at my windshield and the number on the ticket

Engine runs fine and the trans is brand new. That shift kit in the trans really helps

Nah there pretty slow. It was my buddy and he wanted to beat me but lost

The Ford and Amalie are just the sponsors of each lane.

refer to the signs on the building in this pic
https://www.ranger-forums.com/attach...ine=1333807023

Looks like a blast. I didnt know what to think when you sent me that video lol.

what track did you go to? i cant imagine you drove all the way up to new england dragway. but i dont know how far you are from it

If it was an 06 monte ss it had the 5.3L v8 in it same as the pontiac grand prix GXP. Which is a mid-high 13 sec car stock. I could see you winning if it had the anemic 3.5 in it, but that isn't available in the SS. So this is BS, or your buddy can't drive an automatic car for the life of him..

Attachment 79026

lol just the facts man.

Its deff a v6. Says SS on it I think it's just the base with stickers. Ill get some pix for you

It was NED it was a 2hr ride for me

That would make sense then lol cuz the v8's are pretty stout haha

oh word. thats not to bad then. ive been there a couple times. never seen a lambo or a s8 there the times ive gone. mostly old muscle cars some newer muscle cars, trucks, and the ricer hondas

LOL. Way to provide this info NOW. Would have made more sense to do it when I pointed out there was no way the Ranger is faster then the SS. It would have made even more sense to put it in your original post...that way people didn't have to call you out on it.

What kind of mirror is this? Is it on a Ranger?

Ib4drivetrainissuesthread....

Looks like a blast, your reaction time is slow. :)

x2.
Your reaction time is that of a frail old women.

Wikipedia says 04-05 mc ss got a 3.5 supercharged, then 06-07 got the 5.3

it was actually a SC 3.8. same motor I had in my GTP. even then it had 240hp and 280 ft lb of torque and was a low-mid 14 sec car.

Now if it was an 00-04 SS it had an n/a 3.8 that only made 200 hp. A 4.0 SOHC ranger is definitely as quick, if not a bit quicker then those.

expedition/navigator im pretty sure.

edit: or 09+ 150 i think.

unless I'm reading the slip wrong, I'd say you need to work on your reaction time, LOL.