Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

2002FX4's SAS thread

Old Mar 26, 2007
  #76  
casfz1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: southgate, mi
very nice job.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #77  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
lol....
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #78  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
ya sounds like a fuel cell in the back where the spare used to be would be better!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #79  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Looks good, too tall, but lets not get into that convo again. One thing that I dont like is the rear shackle angle, looks like that could use some major help. Can we get a direct side shot of the rear shackles.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #80  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
Looks good, too tall, but lets not get into that convo again. One thing that I dont like is the rear shackle angle, looks like that could use some major help. Can we get a direct side shot of the rear shackles.
rear shackle looks pretty straight up and down to me.......that is the way it should be...
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #81  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
rear shackle looks pretty straight up and down to me.......that is the way it should be...
the rear shackle should have some angle towards the back of the truck not perpendicular to the ground, and in a couple pics it looks like the passenger side shackle is pointed a hair or two forward.
 

Last edited by redranger4.0; Mar 26, 2007 at 07:02 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #82  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
rear shackle looks pretty straight up and down to me.......that is the way it should be...
Some quick tech, if the shackle is completly vertical, then very little flex can be achieved, as the spring drops when flexing the shackle needs to be able drop with it (comming closer to vertical), if the shackle is already vertical at ride height it has no were to go but inverted (pointing forward), which can have some bad effects.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #83  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
looks great dude cant wait to see it
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #84  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Looks badass man, i love it.

Have you had it on the expressway driving yet? I'd like to know how it drives and handles from 0-70.

I wanna see some flexing now!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #85  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Wow, that is how I want my truck to look!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #86  
camodown's Avatar
Lost in Nowhere
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 1
From: Midland, TX
I don't know if you said or anything because I didn't read everyone's posts, but what are you going to do with your old lift. jw

truck looks bad *** btw
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #87  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
I wonder how you brake too, lol...My braking isint the best with 35s, idk how you guys do it with larger tires..
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #88  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
I wonder how you brake too, lol...My braking isint the best with 35s, idk how you guys do it with larger tires..
stop sooner
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #89  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Well i have figured that out since i have had them on my truck for 6,000 miles.

I meant larger tires than what i have....35"+

Im talking if i had to stop to dodge an accident or something crossing the road, i would be screwed..
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007
  #90  
_97_4X4_'s Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
That's looking great man... i have a question for ya and if ya could get a pic for me that would be GREAT!

I noticed you moved the front spring perch slightly more towards the chunk than the stock location... i will have to do this as well and i was wondering how you ran the u-bolts through... did you drill another hole in part of the chunk? Also, how did you run a u-bolt on the other side? Did you round off the part where the stock spring perch is?

I appreciate any help you could give me!
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #91  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by zabeard
looks great man.

full tank of gas i hope? man i hate that ranger lean.
Just about full (7/8 full). It took me abit of figuring before I realized that's what was causing it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #92  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
Some quick tech, if the shackle is completly vertical, then very little flex can be achieved, as the spring drops when flexing the shackle needs to be able drop with it (comming closer to vertical), if the shackle is already vertical at ride height it has no were to go but inverted (pointing forward), which can have some bad effects.

Believe me, you don't know how many times I mounted, cut, moved, remounted, etc. the rear hangers. All because I kept shifting the weight on the rear (moving stuff in/out of the bed while I was using it as storage space). When I finally realized this, I kept pretty much just my old leafs in the bed for abit of weight to get the angle I want (just about the angle of the front shackles). I have a camper shell (probably around 100 lbs.) that will go on the back soon for my move. Therefore I wanted to have that similar weight on the rear and not have the shackle be at like 45* or steeper with weight. And besides, the leafs arn't called long travel for nothing. They drop down a good several inches without a forced flex. Not to mention having the shackles just slightly "back" of vertical (similar to the front shackles) achieves the greatest amount of lift. So believe me, I know where you are coming from and ALOT of thought went into all of the engineering; those hangers arn't the only thing that I re-did more than once!
 

Last edited by 2002FX4; Mar 27, 2007 at 02:43 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #93  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
Looks good, too tall, but lets not get into that convo again. One thing that I dont like is the rear shackle angle, looks like that could use some major help. Can we get a direct side shot of the rear shackles.
Opinions are like ***-holes...

Just giving ya some sh*t!
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #94  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
I wonder how you brake too, lol...My braking isint the best with 35s, idk how you guys do it with larger tires..
I'm upgrading the stock Waggy single-piston calipers to Bendix double-piston as well as using cross-drilled rotors.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #95  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by _97_4X4_
That's looking great man... i have a question for ya and if ya could get a pic for me that would be GREAT!

I noticed you moved the front spring perch slightly more towards the chunk than the stock location... i will have to do this as well and i was wondering how you ran the u-bolts through... did you drill another hole in part of the chunk? Also, how did you run a u-bolt on the other side? Did you round off the part where the stock spring perch is?

I appreciate any help you could give me!
Lots and lots and lots of GRINDING to get the fit just right!
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #96  
2002FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by camodown
I don't know if you said or anything because I didn't read everyone's posts, but what are you going to do with your old lift. jw

truck looks bad *** btw
Already sold the RCD dood.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #97  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by 2002FX4
Opinions are like ***-holes...

Just giving ya some sh*t!
Im glad to see some people still have their funny bone...
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #98  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by 2002FX4
I'm upgrading the stock Waggy single-piston calipers to Bendix double-piston as well as using cross-drilled rotors.
NICE, keep us updated on that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #99  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=291865
I would defidently give keith a call when you need brake lines for those new brakes.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007
  #100  
_97_4X4_'s Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
Originally Posted by 2002FX4
Lots and lots and lots of GRINDING to get the fit just right!

That's what I thought... looks like I have some grinding to do this weekend!

Thanks alot man!
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.