2.3L Ecoboost Tech General & Technical discussion of the 2.3L Ecoboost engine.

2.3 5 speed performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-06-2023
davemon's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2.3 5 speed performance

Had my 2.3 engine rebuilt and it runs great on flat roads but cruising in OD (5 speed manual) at 70-80 as soon as I hit any up grade it just seems to fall on its face and quickly loses speed. Requiring a down shift. Since this is not my daily driver am I expecting too much from this little 4 banger or is this typical? This is with no load so I'm wondering if any performance up grades would help and what they might be.


 
  #2  
Old 08-06-2023
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 30,651
Received 2,824 Likes on 2,589 Posts
Always include the year of the Ranger, as there were 2 different 2.3l engines and groups of years had different horse powers

You have a 1994 2,3l SOHC Lima engine, also called "the Pinto" engine because if was first used in a 1974 Ford Pinto

1994 2.3l would be rated at 100HP(at 4,600rpm) with 133ft/lb torque at 2,600rpm

The 2,600rpm is when the engine has the most torque/"power", so if you are in 5th gear and going up a grade at 2,000rpm you WILL lose speed, need to downshift to get engine RPMs near the 2,600rpm
Cruising on flat roads at 2,000-2,200rpm is fine

Also check your rear axle ratio
Look at the Build Label on the back edge of drivers door, take a picture of it so you have it handy, lots of info on that label about this one vehicle, this is what it came with from Ford Factory
At the bottom is has AXLE, and under it a code
Then go here: https://www.therangerstation.com/tec...ag-door-codes/

Scroll down and look up your code
Many 4cyl Rangers came with low axle ratios to get better MPG, new buyers were not interested in power they wanted MPG
3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.55 are the lower power but higher MPG ratios
3.73 was the standard ratio in most V6 Rangers
4.10 was best for towing or hauling loads, but lower MPG

The lower the ratio the lower the engine RPMs at speed, so a 3.08 ratio would have a much higher top speed, than a 4.10 but lower 0 to 60mph time to get up to speed than a 4.10
3.73 was the compromise ratio, lol

 
  #3  
Old 08-06-2023
davemon's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The year is a 1994 and I'll check the final drive gear ratio. Since there is no tach I guess one is in order as it seems to run best wound up fairly tight. Thanks for the info as it will give me a starting place.
 
  #4  
Old 08-06-2023
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 30,651
Received 2,824 Likes on 2,589 Posts
No Tach in a Manual trans Ranger?
Odd


 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2.3Ranger09
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
4 Weeks Ago 09:29 AM
AWolf
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
0
06-21-2022 02:13 PM
Jacob121301
2.3L & 2.5L I4 Tech
1
09-10-2021 11:27 AM
2.3L turd
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
2
04-07-2011 08:44 AM
gtpoacher
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
1
04-06-2011 10:37 AM



Quick Reply: 2.3 5 speed performance



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 AM.