3.0 modded Vs 4.0
Originally Posted by RRF901
Pretty much the only way you can beat the 4.0's is with forced induction. Not saying you CAN'T do with with N/A engine.. but it would require a lot of internal work. Throw your truck on the dyno and it'll seem a lot less peppy. I had almost every bolt on, aside from an Efan. This includes.. UD pulley, headers, intake, exhaust, Xcal2, ROLLER ROCKERS.. and was disappointed by the numbers on the dyno. Then of course we bolted on the whipple and saw some real numbers. :)
*edit BTW bring your truck over my way and I'll smoke you on 33's =]
Last edited by l2en; Mar 29, 2007 at 01:49 PM.
Originally Posted by markw_06
It was a 02 4.0 supercab auto trans. Dont see how u could not know how to drive a automatic lol. Just push it to the floor.
I didn't say the other guy didn't know HOW to drive it -- I merely commented on it being a specific driver: if he doesn't push it a lot his truck will be slower than if he does due to adaptive stuff in the transmission controls.
Originally Posted by n3elz
That seems unlikely though -- you think you're going to get more torque out of a design which wastes more in the valve train and has lower displacement? We're talking v6 to v6 here, not i6 to v6...
I'm just saying that OHV engines will typically make more torque vs horsepower than an SOHC or DOHC design.
Oh and I whooped up on full sizes when I had my ranger (pullies/hurst/tuner/borla/MAC)- a big truck is just that- a heavy truck compared to the ranger.. power : weight ratio people, think about it.
Id love to race a 3.0 with a EE on it! Would be awesome to hear it at WOT.... Although I have never been beatin by a 4.0 yet, auto or manual. Havent raced any highly modified (ie ones that appear that someone has been in the engine)... Doesnt mean I wont get beat by one some day, but as for now, I have yet to race a truck a loose of any sort. Doesnt mean I wont see a lightning,saleen, or some 7.3 with some mods to teach me otherwise...
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
the 4.0 has almost 100 more stock horsepower than a 3.0.....
I dont know where you are getting your numbers from, but a 04+ 3.0 has 148hp and the 4.0sohc from 01+ has 207 do the math and thats 59 more hp far from "100 more stock horsepower"
Originally Posted by 07SPORT
I was gonna say what about weight... if you were in a single cab 3.0 2wd vs. a 4wd ext cab 4.0... well... you would have a chance... I think
So much of it is setup. All the hoopla with HP is one thing, traction is another. Think about this. My s-10 will run 60' in 2 seconds flat (hopefully soon to be 1.8 sec). the average ranger (or s-10)will be around 2.4 seconds. 4/10's of a second is HUGE. Traction lock, traction bars, and some good rear tires should be on the top list of mods.
Originally Posted by graniteguy
A manual 3.0 single cab can take a 4.0 4wd ext cab. I never raced side by side but I've seen two at the track basically running a 16 flat compared to my 16.3 in the 4.0.
So much of it is setup. All the hoopla with HP is one thing, traction is another. Think about this. My s-10 will run 60' in 2 seconds flat (hopefully soon to be 1.8 sec). the average ranger (or s-10)will be around 2.4 seconds. 4/10's of a second is HUGE. Traction lock, traction bars, and some good rear tires should be on the top list of mods.
So much of it is setup. All the hoopla with HP is one thing, traction is another. Think about this. My s-10 will run 60' in 2 seconds flat (hopefully soon to be 1.8 sec). the average ranger (or s-10)will be around 2.4 seconds. 4/10's of a second is HUGE. Traction lock, traction bars, and some good rear tires should be on the top list of mods.
Ill just have to get a video of it sometime.. Im gunna bet the people thinking the 4.0 is so great owns one. lol i meen why should i worry bout how good the 4.0 is when i just need to be working on mine. My truck isnt just slow. a grand am gt only beat me by 1 1/2 cars the other night. That was before i added the pullies so who knows..
i highly doubt a 2000 3.0 can win a race against a 4.0 sohc. UNLESS the other driver really wasn't trying, or maybe his truck wasn't running good. all i know is that my 4.0 sohc (auto) would beat any 3.0 that didn't have a supercharger. end of comment.
Originally Posted by markw_06
Ill just have to get a video of it sometime.. Im gunna bet the people thinking the 4.0 is so great owns one. lol i meen why should i worry bout how good the 4.0 is when i just need to be working on mine. My truck isnt just slow. a grand am gt only beat me by 1 1/2 cars the other night. That was before i added the pullies so who knows..
I dunno what else to tell ya beside just get in my truck and drive it.. I figure if someone has worn plugs and wires. dirty air filter. dont take care if it like i do. IV seen people not change there oil for 20,000 miles just becasue no one has told them what to do about cars. Im just saying i did beat him. Maybe because his truck wasnt as good running shape as mine i dunno..
my fiances 99 grand ma gt has 130k on it, and will pull away from me anytime anywhere but snow. a 15.9 is not fast. i have not even had my truck more than 85mph cause i dont need to prove anything at all. i have no clue what my truck runs in a quarter but id be confident its in the 17s. if i wanted a fast truck, it would have to be diesel of have a belt driven throttle body
Originally Posted by 07SPORT
why worry about it, were all ford guys, were suppose to diss others trucks like S-10s and such, not rangers... point is... you want a race vehicle? buy a sports car...durr
I was going like 10 mph the other day around a corner and when i floored it the transmission kicked down an i kinda drifted around the corner.. was scary as hell but awsome at the same time lol.
Originally Posted by markw_06
I was going like 10 mph the other day around a corner and when i floored it the transmission kicked down an i kinda drifted around the corner.. was scary as hell but awsome at the same time lol.





