2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Common upgrades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2009
  #1  
Vonhanson's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Glencoe, Minnesota
Common upgrades?

What are the most common things that you've done to your 3.0.

intake?

exhaust?

lets hear it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009
  #2  
Major1988's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Jenks OK
i got K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 series(i think) exhaust with dual Outlet.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009
  #3  
Casper98's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 3
From: Gresham OR
Under drive pulley
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009
  #4  
Hanks Rangers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 821
Likes: 2
From: Sandpoint, ID
replaced it!!!!! ha ha ha!
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009
  #5  
N20-3.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 4
From: Orlando,FL
See below.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #6  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Not much...

I haven't done much. K&N airfilter (direct O.E.M replacement), Cherry Bomb Glaspack Muffler. I did have an air ram system but I got rid of it. looking a possible engine swap and having this engine rebuilt to go in a 1923 T-Bucket. of course this is the 4th engine in my ranger this year too.


Name:  100_0267.jpg
Views: 166
Size:  236.8 KB

I also switched back from Royal Purple 10W30 to Ford Motorcraft 10W30 as well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #7  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
I haven't done much. K&N airfilter (direct O.E.M replacement), Cherry Bomb Glaspack Muffler. I did have an air ram system but I got rid of it. looking a possible engine swap and having this engine rebuilt to go in a 1923 T-Bucket. of course this is the 4th engine in my ranger this year too.




I also switched back from Royal Purple 10W30 to Ford Motorcraft 10W30 as well.
you totally n-word rigged that **** eh?
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #8  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Under drive pullies and a tune are the most bang for your buck upgrades for the 3.0 there are.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #9  
fordlife's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Lemoore CA/561, Fl
^x2 and i have a catback exhaust and a k&n intake as well
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #10  
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: phoenix AZ
Sig says it all.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #11  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Intake and Exhaust are a waste of money on a stock engine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009
  #12  
t3ob's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 1
From: Olive Branch, MS
Magnaflow SI/DO exhaust and K&N Intake
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009
  #13  
Rapala's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
a good set of gears as well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009
  #14  
Vonhanson's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Glencoe, Minnesota
what kind of tune, and prices of them?

to be honest i would probably do a k&n intake and a tune. maybe pullies but dont know much about them so idk.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009
  #15  
WillInThe04Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mount, NC
I got the K&N CAI for now, I plan to come back in with a gibson muffler sooner or later
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009
  #16  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
biggest noticeable gain would be 4:10 gears but be ready to do a lot of work and spend more money on gas.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #17  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
K&N intake won't get you a damn bit of power.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #18  
kingwoodranger's Avatar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
Originally Posted by Jp7
Intake and Exhaust are a waste of money on a stock engine.
well it gives you a small gain on a stock motor and its not a waste of money cause if you do decide to do something to the motor you have the mods to support it. duhhh
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #19  
kingwoodranger's Avatar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
Originally Posted by GrafixGuy
biggest noticeable gain would be 4:10 gears but be ready to do a lot of work and spend more money on gas.
actually my truck has 4:10's in it and they came from the factory that way and my truck gets the same gas mileage regular rangers without the 4:10's get so i wouldn't necassarily say that your gas mileage will suffer
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #20  
Vonhanson's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Glencoe, Minnesota
Originally Posted by Jp7
K&N intake won't get you a damn bit of power.
and why not?
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #21  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Originally Posted by kingwoodranger
actually my truck has 4:10's in it and they came from the factory that way and my truck gets the same gas mileage regular rangers without the 4:10's get so i wouldn't necassarily say that your gas mileage will suffer
disagree, the EPA standards are tested on a vehicle with each combination of motor and transmissions, the rear diff will make a difference on top of that, aswell as added weight. the EPA standards are also quite in accurate... i have recorded up to 23 mpg where as EPA says my truck should only get 17ish on the hiway...

4.10's will decrease your hiway mileage, but increase your city mileage
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #22  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Vonhanson
and why not?
Because the stock intake isn't restrictive - the heads are.

Name:  normal_search-button-for-dummies.jpg
Views: 121
Size:  28.9 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #23  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
LMAO, "Also includes free of charge: A step by step guide on how to avoid being flamed"
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #24  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by --weezl--
LMAO, "Also includes free of charge: A step by step guide on how to avoid being flamed"
You've got that right!~
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009
  #25  
Vonhanson's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Glencoe, Minnesota
didn't mean to start anything uhh, faster than you...

but to be honest, i would think an aftermarket cone filter would be better than the stock filter that is 10 years old. weather or not it would be k&n or something different.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 AM.