2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Common upgrades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-24-2009
Vonhanson's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glencoe, Minnesota
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Common upgrades?

What are the most common things that you've done to your 3.0.

intake?

exhaust?

lets hear it.
 
  #2  
Old 12-24-2009
Major1988's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jenks OK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i got K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 series(i think) exhaust with dual Outlet.
 
  #3  
Old 12-24-2009
Casper98's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gresham OR
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Under drive pulley
 
  #4  
Old 12-24-2009
Hanks Rangers's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sandpoint, ID
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
replaced it!!!!! ha ha ha!
 
  #5  
Old 12-24-2009
N20-3.0's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See below.
 
  #6  
Old 12-26-2009
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: unknown
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not much...

I haven't done much. K&N airfilter (direct O.E.M replacement), Cherry Bomb Glaspack Muffler. I did have an air ram system but I got rid of it. looking a possible engine swap and having this engine rebuilt to go in a 1923 T-Bucket. of course this is the 4th engine in my ranger this year too.


Name:  100_0267.jpg
Views: 137
Size:  236.8 KB

I also switched back from Royal Purple 10W30 to Ford Motorcraft 10W30 as well.
 
  #7  
Old 12-26-2009
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
I haven't done much. K&N airfilter (direct O.E.M replacement), Cherry Bomb Glaspack Muffler. I did have an air ram system but I got rid of it. looking a possible engine swap and having this engine rebuilt to go in a 1923 T-Bucket. of course this is the 4th engine in my ranger this year too.




I also switched back from Royal Purple 10W30 to Ford Motorcraft 10W30 as well.
you totally n-word rigged that **** eh?
 
  #8  
Old 12-26-2009
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Under drive pullies and a tune are the most bang for your buck upgrades for the 3.0 there are.
 
  #9  
Old 12-26-2009
fordlife's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lemoore CA/561, Fl
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^x2 and i have a catback exhaust and a k&n intake as well
 
  #10  
Old 12-26-2009
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sig says it all.
 
  #11  
Old 12-26-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Intake and Exhaust are a waste of money on a stock engine.
 
  #12  
Old 12-26-2009
t3ob's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Magnaflow SI/DO exhaust and K&N Intake
 
  #13  
Old 12-27-2009
Rapala's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a good set of gears as well.
 
  #14  
Old 12-27-2009
Vonhanson's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glencoe, Minnesota
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what kind of tune, and prices of them?

to be honest i would probably do a k&n intake and a tune. maybe pullies but dont know much about them so idk.
 
  #15  
Old 12-27-2009
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rocky Mount, NC
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got the K&N CAI for now, I plan to come back in with a gibson muffler sooner or later
 
  #16  
Old 12-27-2009
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
biggest noticeable gain would be 4:10 gears but be ready to do a lot of work and spend more money on gas.
 
  #17  
Old 12-28-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
K&N intake won't get you a damn bit of power.
 
  #18  
Old 12-28-2009
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
Intake and Exhaust are a waste of money on a stock engine.
well it gives you a small gain on a stock motor and its not a waste of money cause if you do decide to do something to the motor you have the mods to support it. duhhh
 
  #19  
Old 12-28-2009
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrafixGuy
biggest noticeable gain would be 4:10 gears but be ready to do a lot of work and spend more money on gas.
actually my truck has 4:10's in it and they came from the factory that way and my truck gets the same gas mileage regular rangers without the 4:10's get so i wouldn't necassarily say that your gas mileage will suffer
 
  #20  
Old 12-28-2009
Vonhanson's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glencoe, Minnesota
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jp7
K&N intake won't get you a damn bit of power.
and why not?
 
  #21  
Old 12-28-2009
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by kingwoodranger
actually my truck has 4:10's in it and they came from the factory that way and my truck gets the same gas mileage regular rangers without the 4:10's get so i wouldn't necassarily say that your gas mileage will suffer
disagree, the EPA standards are tested on a vehicle with each combination of motor and transmissions, the rear diff will make a difference on top of that, aswell as added weight. the EPA standards are also quite in accurate... i have recorded up to 23 mpg where as EPA says my truck should only get 17ish on the hiway...

4.10's will decrease your hiway mileage, but increase your city mileage
 
  #22  
Old 12-28-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Vonhanson
and why not?
Because the stock intake isn't restrictive - the heads are.

Name:  normal_search-button-for-dummies.jpg
Views: 94
Size:  28.9 KB
 
  #23  
Old 12-28-2009
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LMAO, "Also includes free of charge: A step by step guide on how to avoid being flamed"
 
  #24  
Old 12-28-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by --weezl--
LMAO, "Also includes free of charge: A step by step guide on how to avoid being flamed"
You've got that right!~
 
  #25  
Old 12-28-2009
Vonhanson's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glencoe, Minnesota
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
didn't mean to start anything uhh, faster than you...

but to be honest, i would think an aftermarket cone filter would be better than the stock filter that is 10 years old. weather or not it would be k&n or something different.
 


Quick Reply: Common upgrades?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.