4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

bye bye cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #1  
jerrod07's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: the dalles, oregon
bye bye cats

has anyone ran with no cats... just a flowmaster 40? thats what i'm doing but with a glasspack and it sounds mean but i bet the flowmaster has some bit.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #2  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
and what exactly are u accomplishing by npot running any cats?
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #3  
Scallion02EDGE's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
taking the cats off should only make the exhaust louder and stinkier. Performance wise you will also lose low end torque because the cats create needed back pressure. Your top end might improve slightly, but Ranger cat's are high flow and really dont give much exhaust flow restriction...i say its a better idea to keep them on unless all you're after is loudness.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #4  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by jerrod07
has anyone ran with no cats... just a flowmaster 40? thats what i'm doing but with a glasspack and it sounds mean but i bet the flowmaster has some bit.
02 sensors should be all pissy without. Jus generally a bad idea.

Aaron
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #6  
jrodhotrod's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley, CA
Put a turbo charger on there and you'll really start to feel the gains of not having the cats (aka exhaust restrictions) on there. :D

Depends on your application and engine, but has anybody actually dynoed this engine with and without cats to see what happens when you remove them? From my experiences removing cats was generally a performance booster, even in N/A engines. While it may hurt TQ slightly the net effect was a positive.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #7  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
backpressure is not needed, its exhaust gas volecity that is...

turbo applications are a totally different topic...

running no cats is not only stupid but illegal and ignorant. modern day catalyic converters are a really good flowing design and dont restrict the exhaust much.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #8  
Trevelyn1015's Avatar
Still El Presidente...
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Originally Posted by jrodhotrod
Put a turbo charger on there and you'll really start to feel the gains of not having the cats (aka exhaust restrictions) on there. :D

Depends on your application and engine, but has anybody actually dynoed this engine with and without cats to see what happens when you remove them? From my experiences removing cats was generally a performance booster, even in N/A engines. While it may hurt TQ slightly the net effect was a positive.

did you miss the posts about teh 02 sensors?

it's wise to just leave the 5 million cats we have on our rangers, alone...
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #9  
FoMoCoFiddy's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 1
From: Smackdownville Tx
I dont have any cats. :)
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #10  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
Originally Posted by FoMoCoEdge
I dont have any cats. :)
and the exhaust has made you retarded...








served.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #11  
FoMoCoFiddy's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 1
From: Smackdownville Tx
Originally Posted by SUPERGILDO
and the exhaust has made you retarded...








served.

Almost.. :) Still smarter than you.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #12  
jrodhotrod's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley, CA
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
backpressure is not needed, its exhaust gas volecity that is...

turbo applications are a totally different topic...

running no cats is not only stupid but illegal and ignorant. modern day catalyic converters are a really good flowing design and dont restrict the exhaust much.
With this I agree. The performance gain that you will see with taking out the cats it isn't worth it on the street. That and its a whole lot healthier for the environement.

As for the turbo, you lose TQ when you free up restrictions in the exhaust because of a loss of backpressure, but turbos make torque so the less backpressure the better to keep those gasses flowing :D
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #13  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
again i said turbo is different and another topic. i dont know much bout turbos but i know enough about exhausts to tell what and wont work. but yes, for N/A leave em on.

best exhust for a turbo is exit right after the front wheel :)
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #14  
jrodhotrod's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley, CA
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
best exhust for a turbo is exit right after the front wheel :)
Yup! Too bad that's a little loud for the street he he.

anyways... end threadjack, back on topic...
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #15  
Trevelyn1015's Avatar
Still El Presidente...
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 6
From: Texas
my 460's exhaust exits behind the front wheels... sorta...

it is def. too loud.

no turbo, of course.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #16  
EdGe_wannabe's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 0
From: Richmond Hill, Georgia
I have my last one hollowed out, but it didn't become any louder either, just a waste of time...

Brenton
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #17  
jerrod07's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: the dalles, oregon
my truck sure doesn't feel like it lost torque. if anything it helped my acceleration . and i don't get that annoying popping nose from my exhast anymore . just a beefy grumble.i was just wondering what the flowmaster would sound like.o and my sensors didn't even through my engine light. or affect my mileage.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #18  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by jerrod07
didn't even through my engine light.
Give it time. The Catalyst Monitor has a certain set of conditions that must be met for it to complete and light the CEL. When it does you will probably have a code P0420.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #19  
jerrod07's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: the dalles, oregon
well i've gone 500 miles with no prob
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005
  #20  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
lol 500 miles is nothing...it akes the ecu about that much to fully adjust.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JAMES7273
General Ford Ranger Discussion
16
Oct 16, 2008 02:40 PM
00 Ranger
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
21
May 16, 2008 05:06 PM
TXranger4x4
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
10
Jul 11, 2006 12:34 AM
Rangerboy03lvl2
Drivetrain Tech
31
Oct 21, 2005 11:38 PM
ranger_punkin
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
May 9, 2005 07:55 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.