8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

351 into a Ranger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #26  
Old 02-04-2008
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I say for the price to do the swap you could rebuild the 4.0 and do a few performance mods to it and have a nice power plant without custom wiring....
 
  #27  
Old 02-04-2008
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesooooota
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
+1, thats probably what i would have done if i had the 4.0 in the first place
 
  #28  
Old 02-04-2008
JoshK's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CC, Indiana
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So whats this I hear about not wanting to put anymore money into your truck after the axleS? What about a 4.0 is enough engine power?

haha your outta control!

I feel you pain :(
 
  #29  
Old 02-04-2008
dlibson's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brooklyn Park, MN
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know what, a 4.0 isn't bad. But you can't beat the sound of a 5.0 or a 4.6. It just plain rocks!
 
  #30  
Old 02-04-2008
JoshK's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CC, Indiana
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dlibson
You know what, a 4.0 isn't bad. But you can't beat the sound of a 5.0 or a 4.6. It just plain rocks!
Expecially with some headers, free flow exhaulst and a mild cam! Just plain mean
 
  #31  
Old 02-04-2008
tmsoko's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will try to dig up some pictures. My picture site is giving my troubles by postin red "x" instead of my picture links.

As for the computer, you need to use an explorer V8 eec-v. That is compatible with your truck. I would really recommend getting a complete wrecked explorer V8 and pop that engine in. You can leave stock, modify, heck, even stroke to 347 or supercharge. The 351W is definitely more powerful, but alot of additional work. Do the 302 for now - really a pretty straight forward swap without a whole lot of wiring as everyone seems to think. Check out the stickys on the RPS V8 board. Plenty of detail there fo you. You definitely have an advantage over the others by not haveing to worry about the IFS mounts, so you can fit some nice sized headers and wake up the 302!
 
  #32  
Old 02-04-2008
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
thanks for the advice Todd. Appreciate it.
 
  #33  
Old 02-04-2008
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tmsoko
As for the computer, you need to use an explorer V8 eec-v
how can you use a 302 PCM with a 351 engine? completely different fuel map and timing...
 
  #34  
Old 02-04-2008
HAZZARDJOHN's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wyoming MN
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope you plan on putting some money inot some performance goodies, otherwise it is a waste of money. If memory serves a late 80's 351 is something like 210 HP Granted is is 310 Ft lbs of torque at 2800 (Very decent numbers for 1990 but for today it is not that impressive), but still very minimal gains for the amount of work involved just to get **** poor gas mileage.

~HJ
 
  #35  
Old 02-05-2008
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by HAZZARDJOHN
I hope you plan on putting some money inot some performance goodies, otherwise it is a waste of money.
performance parts for a 351 isn't cheap either.....
 
  #36  
Old 02-05-2008
EdGe_wannabe's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was REALLY thinking about this a while ago, but with all the hassle of doing a 351, a 302 is 'easier' and you can get some very nice numbers out of a 302.

Brenton
 
  #37  
Old 02-05-2008
tmsoko's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
how can you use a 302 PCM with a 351 engine? completely different fuel map and timing...

In the initial note, I mentioned the need for a tune to account for the cubes.
 
  #38  
Old 03-31-2008
00 Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351 ?

I am thinking about a engine swap for either a 5.0 or a 351. Will i loose my four wheel drive in this swap???
 
  #39  
Old 03-31-2008
tmsoko's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, you can use a 4406 F150/expedition case with the 4R70W trans. Otherwsise, you can have AWD with the explorer 4404.
 
  #40  
Old 03-31-2008
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesooooota
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Or you can get an adapter to run yer 1354 ranger T-case from AA(advanced adapters) that will bolt onto the back of watever trany you use. C4, AOD, 4R70W

example..
http://72.20.96.178/commerce/ccc1257-c4-automatic.htm
http://72.20.96.178/commerce/ccc1258-aod-automatic.htm

I used a 4406 from a 03 F-150. bigger case and can handle more torque.
 
  #41  
Old 03-31-2008
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
351s had E4OD or C6 automatics behind them...the gAyOD would puke itself behind a 351. some of the late 351/autos could have been a 4R70w but a 1990 would be E4OD or C6 with a BW-13-56 t-case attatched.

performance parts for a 351 are no more then for a 302, its essentially the same engine and quite a few parts will interchange.
 
  #42  
Old 03-31-2008
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesooooota
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
yeah, i was taking for him doing the 302 swap, made it sound like he wanted to do either
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THE H.P FREAK
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
3
09-08-2011 10:31 PM
dan24
General Ford Ranger Discussion
7
09-19-2010 01:56 PM
vivalajesus2304
8-Cylinder Tech
23
10-29-2009 01:56 PM
RangerMuse
8-Cylinder Tech
12
01-19-2009 01:21 AM
964X4
8-Cylinder Tech
3
09-24-2008 11:22 PM



Quick Reply: 351 into a Ranger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.