8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

5.0 vs 5.4 DOHC

Old Nov 17, 2010
  #1  
Taylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Ive been dubbed....an old volk
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,110
Likes: 3
From: Nashville, NC
5.0 vs 5.4 DOHC

5.0 vs. 5.4 DOHC (to swap into ranger)

What do you guys think?
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #2  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
5.0 is quite a bit easier by the sounds of it, kinda, your 04 will be difficult no matter what.

5.4L probably wont fit between the frame rails or under hood. it is an extremely tight fit on my truck and i dont even have a ranger frame, let alone a stock front axle or 8.8. the 5.4L specifically a DOHC is 36" tall roughly. The thing would be skying out of the hood.
 

Last edited by zabeard; Nov 17, 2010 at 08:05 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #3  
fordmike1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by Taylor
5.0 vs. 5.4 DOHC (to swap into ranger)

What do you guys think?
The 5.0 is the clear winner here for ease but the 5.4DOHC sure would be badass. The 5.4DOHC will fit but you better be a good fabercater to do it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #4  
Topdog2007's Avatar
Level I Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: Blairsville, Ga
I would just go the 5.0 route.....You can get just as much..if not more power with certain mods! But..If you have plenty of time and money the 5.4 would be unique and BadAss! I had a 5.4 drivetrain laying around before I did my swap, but I didnt have that much time or money to invest in all the Fab work that was required.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #5  
Jelly's Ford's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 874
Likes: 3
From: KnoxVegas, TN
Originally Posted by fordmike1
The 5.0 is the clear winner here for ease but the 5.4DOHC sure would be badass.
Especially a supercharged 5.4 out of a lightning.

But yeah the 5.0 is shorter and skinnier than the 5.4. And if you get a 5.0 out of an exploder, they are a lot easier to be installed from what I heard.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #6  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
How does the 4.6 compare in size to the 5.0 and 5.4?
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2010
  #7  
Topdog2007's Avatar
Level I Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: Blairsville, Ga
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
How does the 4.6 compare in size to the 5.0 and 5.4?
Its a little wider than the 5.0.....not a real issue....but the Wiring is alot harder to sort out.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2010
  #8  
Alex98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, Maryland
yeah the 5.0 fits right into the ranger, using the same motor mounts. as well as the transmission mounts as well the main thing that would give you trouble is keeping it a manual. you would have to get a transmission out of an early f150 or something like that i think one of those would bolt right up to it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #9  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
How does the 4.6 compare in size to the 5.0 and 5.4?
1" narrower than a 5.4, hight is a little shorter. I would still say its significantly larger than the 5.0
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #10  
fordmike1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by Topdog2007
Its a little wider than the 5.0.....not a real issue....but the Wiring is alot harder to sort out.
The wiring is no problem now as there is an aftermarket wiring harness that has just a few wires to hook up and its ready to start. Here is the link to it.

RJM Injection Tech 4.6L Harness
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #11  
HighRollerII's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Wirelessly posted

Don't quote me on this but a 4.6 the block is the same. I just remember hearing that..
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #12  
korey89's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 6
From: South, FL


 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #13  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
lol new 5.0 would be nice
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #14  
fordmike1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by korey89


I so want one of these engines bad. I am going to hook it to a chain and drag it around behind my PSD 4x4 thru all the big rocks and mud I can find here and then put it up for sale and laugh at all the GM guys cry about it being all F'ed up. Should be good and I will post a vid on youtube when I do it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #15  
fordmike1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by ranger4.0
lol new 5.0 would be nice
Yea this would be a bad *** engine to have. It would show its back side to all the GM powered Pos's.

Name:  11Mustang_50L_09_HR.jpg
Views: 526
Size:  29.3 KB

Plus its way sexier looking then them LS junks!!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #16  
ranger024x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,061
Likes: 0
From: nova
Originally Posted by fordmike1

Plus its way sexier looking then them LS junks!!!
LS motors have been out since 98 fyi, its hard to compare 2 motors that are 13 years apart imo. And btw, the supercharged ls9 still puts out more power than the gt500
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #17  
Taylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Ive been dubbed....an old volk
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,110
Likes: 3
From: Nashville, NC
Well I was asking because I saw this in a salvage yard. Not sure what is wrong with it, didnt have time to ask. I thinnk its a 96. Everything looks good and intact.

Name:  IMG00149-20101119-1556.jpg
Views: 537
Size:  135.9 KB

what do you guys think?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #18  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
you really wouldnt be gaining much by putting that into your ranger...the 4.0 makes as much if not more power than the 5.0...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #19  
Taylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Ive been dubbed....an old volk
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,110
Likes: 3
From: Nashville, NC
Originally Posted by djfllmn
you really wouldnt be gaining much by putting that into your ranger...the 4.0 makes as much if not more power than the 5.0...
....was that a joke, or are you serious?

cuz I chuckled a little bit there
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #20  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
its serious...you wont be gaining much

edit: found some power specs

HP: 210 in 96-early 97(first year for v8 explorers)

215 in late 97 when ford put new heads on the 5.0
 

Last edited by djfllmn; Nov 19, 2010 at 04:47 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #21  
Taylor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Ive been dubbed....an old volk
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,110
Likes: 3
From: Nashville, NC
So the best bet is...what year?

I'm not too sure what year it was.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #22  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
well i would definatly go with a later 5.0 like 99-00...and tweak it a little
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #23  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
The 5.0 Ex is rated at 210~215 HP, most EFI 5.0 Mustangs (except Cobras) are rated at 205~225. 4.0L SOHC Rangers are rated at 207.

Horsepower is a derived number, not measured directly, and is proportional to torque X RPM. Any engine that breathes better at high R's will have a built in advantage for the max HP number. Comparing the peak horsepower numbers of two engines looks at one point in each curve and ignores the rest.

Just remember that the average stock EFI 5.0 makes about 50 lb-ft more peak torque than the 4.0 SOHC in the Ranger. Peak horsepower definitely means something but it is only part of the story.

The stock Explorer engine is not a performance driver's dream but it is a good basis for mods. The truth is that the Ex 5.0 is basically a detuned Cobra Mustang engine with truck cam duration/lift and a bad set of exhaust manifolds. So the potential is definitely there and the 5.0 aftermarket is huge compared to that of the 4.0.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #24  
Topdog2007's Avatar
Level I Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: Blairsville, Ga
Ranger V6 4.0 - 160hp 220ft lbs tq
Explorer V8 5.0- 215hp 288ft lbs tq
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2010
  #25  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Taylor
So the best bet is...what year?
The "easiest" would be the 99~01 Explorer 5.0 which is not to say that it would be easy, especially if it is to remain a manual 4x4.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 AM.