Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-04-2006
dodge_cowboy's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Russell Springs, KY
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?

Can someone shoot me a link to some reccomended gears to gear to for my Ranger?

I have a 3.0 auto, with 3.73's. It is 2WD. I have 33x12.50's on 15" rims. What gearing do I need??

THANKS!!
 
  #2  
Old 08-04-2006
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lewiston, Maine
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
personally id go with 4.10s ad a limited slip
 
  #3  
Old 08-04-2006
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
4.10's is reccomended. The cheapest and easiest way to do that is to do an "axle swap" from anothe ranger or explorer that already has 4.10's. They can be had for under 200 dollars.


I know of a couple people on this site and RPS that ran/run 4.56's and 33's, they say the power is great, but gas milage isn't.

If it helps any, I'm going with 4.10's and I have the same setup as you right now. I would LOVE to go to 4.56's, but the money is an issue. It will cost basiclly 3x as much to get 4.56's, and 33's aren't goingg to be my largest tire
 
  #4  
Old 08-04-2006
dodge_cowboy's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Russell Springs, KY
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I current have limited slip I think.....
 
  #5  
Old 08-04-2006
ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Imperial Beach, CA
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i am running 32's and 4.56 and im getting about 15-16 mpg and thats strait up haulin a**. when i drive like a granny i get about 17-19. i aso have a locker so i got posi
 
  #6  
Old 08-04-2006
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lewiston, Maine
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ranger
i am running 32's and 4.56 and im getting about 15-16 mpg and thats strait up haulin a**. when i drive like a granny i get about 17-19.
but what were your stock gears?
 
  #7  
Old 08-04-2006
ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Imperial Beach, CA
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i started out with a 7.5 w/ 3.73 but exchanged to an 8.8 w/ 4.10s and limited slip now i have 4.56s and a locker
 
  #8  
Old 08-04-2006
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That sounds like a good combo for our little engines. 33's and 4.56's

I like it to have enough torque to pull a bass boat once and a while, and a tandem jet ski trailer. Right now i'm just worried i'll slip the tranny coming off the dock (it's pretty steep)

I have to keep this thing running awesome as long as I can
 
  #9  
Old 08-04-2006
emericax21's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edinburg, Tx
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go with 4.88's
 
  #10  
Old 08-04-2006
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by emericax21
go with 4.88's
I hope this is a joke.


Go with 4.10s for stock performance with best gas mileage.


Go with 4.56s for a lil quicker of the line(but slower top speed) AND a lil less gas mileage. But hey, if u have a buncha extra money to throw around, knock urself out.
 
  #11  
Old 08-04-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.

4.10's w/ 33's on a 3.0... idk. That's what I had and dropped back to 31's for my commute. Idk what it would have been like with 4.56's though. But wouldn't the 4.56's put less stress on the tranny and probably see better city mpg. The tradeoff would be on the highway. I'd like to see what it would have been though. If/when I go back to 33s, I'll probably step up to 4.56 gears. And maybe then go with the B/L and 35s haha
 
  #12  
Old 08-04-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Go with 4.56s for a lil quicker of the line(but slower top speed) AND a lil less gas mileage. But hey, if u have a buncha extra money to throw around, knock urself out.
That most would probably never see anyway...
 
  #13  
Old 08-04-2006
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.

And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.

Aaron
 
  #14  
Old 08-04-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.

And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.

Aaron
B/c I had 33s and 4.10 w/ a 3.0 and would have liked to have had more low end which would have come with 4.56s. Plus if someone is thinking of eventually going to 35s might as well get the 4.56s anyway. But if the ideal ratio were 4.33 it's right in the middle of the 4.10s and 4.56s... one way leans towards high end one leans toward low end. It's a truck, so I'll take the low end

And that's not how it was worded... I was simply commenting on your truthful claim of a lower top speed... But when I read top speed I am thinking top speed of 96 or whatever it may be... and going to 4.56 may lower it to say 86... it's not often, if at all someone will see these speeds (though 86 more often than 96). But still point being, final top speed is not usually of concern. But yes, the higher rpms doing 60-75 on the highway will be a realistic concern. And that is what I would have like to have known... with a 3.0, 4.56s & 33s, what are the RPMs at 75mph? b/c with the 4.10s I think they were ~2700+ but i dont recall now... with the 31s it's ~2500 i think
 
  #15  
Old 08-04-2006
got-dirty's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sliding in the skreets
Posts: 3,829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.
yes they do make 4.30s, for an 8.8.
 
  #16  
Old 08-04-2006
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by got-dirty
yes they do make 4.30s, for an 8.8.
Yah but it's too little of a change for too much money to regear one of our trucks. Sorta the "if you're doing it, go big" theory.

The one benefit of goin to 4.56 is once u get bored of 33s u can upgrade to 35s.
 
  #17  
Old 08-04-2006
ike34's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #18  
Old 08-04-2006
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sawred
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.
Yea, I worded it wrong...

4.10's (if I find a jy axle with em stock) is about 100-120

4.56's (jy axle) 100
(gears) 120
(install) 200


Thats just what I figured out.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craigs2869
Drivetrain Tech
14
10-07-2011 02:32 AM
DaneTrain
Drivetrain Tech
28
09-26-2006 04:38 PM
RicksTJR
Drivetrain Tech
41
06-05-2006 01:56 AM
jimmclrk1
Drivetrain Tech
14
11-03-2005 07:44 PM
mcerwing
Drivetrain Tech
4
08-28-2005 08:57 PM



Quick Reply: 3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 AM.