Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #1  
dodge_cowboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Russell Springs, KY
3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?

Can someone shoot me a link to some reccomended gears to gear to for my Ranger?

I have a 3.0 auto, with 3.73's. It is 2WD. I have 33x12.50's on 15" rims. What gearing do I need??

THANKS!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #2  
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 1
From: Lewiston, Maine
personally id go with 4.10s ad a limited slip
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #3  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
4.10's is reccomended. The cheapest and easiest way to do that is to do an "axle swap" from anothe ranger or explorer that already has 4.10's. They can be had for under 200 dollars.


I know of a couple people on this site and RPS that ran/run 4.56's and 33's, they say the power is great, but gas milage isn't.

If it helps any, I'm going with 4.10's and I have the same setup as you right now. I would LOVE to go to 4.56's, but the money is an issue. It will cost basiclly 3x as much to get 4.56's, and 33's aren't goingg to be my largest tire
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #4  
dodge_cowboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Russell Springs, KY
I current have limited slip I think.....
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #5  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
i am running 32's and 4.56 and im getting about 15-16 mpg and thats strait up haulin a**. when i drive like a granny i get about 17-19. i aso have a locker so i got posi
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #6  
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 1
From: Lewiston, Maine
Originally Posted by ranger
i am running 32's and 4.56 and im getting about 15-16 mpg and thats strait up haulin a**. when i drive like a granny i get about 17-19.
but what were your stock gears?
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #7  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
i started out with a 7.5 w/ 3.73 but exchanged to an 8.8 w/ 4.10s and limited slip now i have 4.56s and a locker
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #8  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
That sounds like a good combo for our little engines. 33's and 4.56's

I like it to have enough torque to pull a bass boat once and a while, and a tandem jet ski trailer. Right now i'm just worried i'll slip the tranny coming off the dock (it's pretty steep)

I have to keep this thing running awesome as long as I can
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #9  
emericax21's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Edinburg, Tx
go with 4.88's
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #10  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by emericax21
go with 4.88's
I hope this is a joke.


Go with 4.10s for stock performance with best gas mileage.


Go with 4.56s for a lil quicker of the line(but slower top speed) AND a lil less gas mileage. But hey, if u have a buncha extra money to throw around, knock urself out.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #11  
sawred's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.

4.10's w/ 33's on a 3.0... idk. That's what I had and dropped back to 31's for my commute. Idk what it would have been like with 4.56's though. But wouldn't the 4.56's put less stress on the tranny and probably see better city mpg. The tradeoff would be on the highway. I'd like to see what it would have been though. If/when I go back to 33s, I'll probably step up to 4.56 gears. And maybe then go with the B/L and 35s haha
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #12  
sawred's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Go with 4.56s for a lil quicker of the line(but slower top speed) AND a lil less gas mileage. But hey, if u have a buncha extra money to throw around, knock urself out.
That most would probably never see anyway...
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #13  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.

And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.

Aaron
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #14  
sawred's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.

And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.

Aaron
B/c I had 33s and 4.10 w/ a 3.0 and would have liked to have had more low end which would have come with 4.56s. Plus if someone is thinking of eventually going to 35s might as well get the 4.56s anyway. But if the ideal ratio were 4.33 it's right in the middle of the 4.10s and 4.56s... one way leans towards high end one leans toward low end. It's a truck, so I'll take the low end

And that's not how it was worded... I was simply commenting on your truthful claim of a lower top speed... But when I read top speed I am thinking top speed of 96 or whatever it may be... and going to 4.56 may lower it to say 86... it's not often, if at all someone will see these speeds (though 86 more often than 96). But still point being, final top speed is not usually of concern. But yes, the higher rpms doing 60-75 on the highway will be a realistic concern. And that is what I would have like to have known... with a 3.0, 4.56s & 33s, what are the RPMs at 75mph? b/c with the 4.10s I think they were ~2700+ but i dont recall now... with the 31s it's ~2500 i think
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #15  
got-dirty's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,829
Likes: 0
From: Sliding in the skreets
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.
yes they do make 4.30s, for an 8.8.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #16  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by got-dirty
yes they do make 4.30s, for an 8.8.
Yah but it's too little of a change for too much money to regear one of our trucks. Sorta the "if you're doing it, go big" theory.

The one benefit of goin to 4.56 is once u get bored of 33s u can upgrade to 35s.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #17  
ike34's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Waterloo, IA
Check out this chart
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech...tirechart.html
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006
  #18  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by sawred
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.
Yea, I worded it wrong...

4.10's (if I find a jy axle with em stock) is about 100-120

4.56's (jy axle) 100
(gears) 120
(install) 200


Thats just what I figured out.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craigs2869
Drivetrain Tech
14
Oct 7, 2011 02:32 AM
DaneTrain
Drivetrain Tech
28
Sep 26, 2006 04:38 PM
RicksTJR
Drivetrain Tech
41
Jun 5, 2006 01:56 AM
jimmclrk1
Drivetrain Tech
14
Nov 3, 2005 07:44 PM
mcerwing
Drivetrain Tech
4
Aug 28, 2005 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 PM.