3.73 w/ 33's... What gears to regear to?
#1
#3
4.10's is reccomended. The cheapest and easiest way to do that is to do an "axle swap" from anothe ranger or explorer that already has 4.10's. They can be had for under 200 dollars.
I know of a couple people on this site and RPS that ran/run 4.56's and 33's, they say the power is great, but gas milage isn't.
If it helps any, I'm going with 4.10's and I have the same setup as you right now. I would LOVE to go to 4.56's, but the money is an issue. It will cost basiclly 3x as much to get 4.56's, and 33's aren't goingg to be my largest tire
I know of a couple people on this site and RPS that ran/run 4.56's and 33's, they say the power is great, but gas milage isn't.
If it helps any, I'm going with 4.10's and I have the same setup as you right now. I would LOVE to go to 4.56's, but the money is an issue. It will cost basiclly 3x as much to get 4.56's, and 33's aren't goingg to be my largest tire
#5
#6
#8
That sounds like a good combo for our little engines. 33's and 4.56's
I like it to have enough torque to pull a bass boat once and a while, and a tandem jet ski trailer. Right now i'm just worried i'll slip the tranny coming off the dock (it's pretty steep)
I have to keep this thing running awesome as long as I can
I like it to have enough torque to pull a bass boat once and a while, and a tandem jet ski trailer. Right now i'm just worried i'll slip the tranny coming off the dock (it's pretty steep)
I have to keep this thing running awesome as long as I can
#10
Originally Posted by emericax21
go with 4.88's
Go with 4.10s for stock performance with best gas mileage.
Go with 4.56s for a lil quicker of the line(but slower top speed) AND a lil less gas mileage. But hey, if u have a buncha extra money to throw around, knock urself out.
#11
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.
4.10's w/ 33's on a 3.0... idk. That's what I had and dropped back to 31's for my commute. Idk what it would have been like with 4.56's though. But wouldn't the 4.56's put less stress on the tranny and probably see better city mpg. The tradeoff would be on the highway. I'd like to see what it would have been though. If/when I go back to 33s, I'll probably step up to 4.56 gears. And maybe then go with the B/L and 35s haha
4.10's w/ 33's on a 3.0... idk. That's what I had and dropped back to 31's for my commute. Idk what it would have been like with 4.56's though. But wouldn't the 4.56's put less stress on the tranny and probably see better city mpg. The tradeoff would be on the highway. I'd like to see what it would have been though. If/when I go back to 33s, I'll probably step up to 4.56 gears. And maybe then go with the B/L and 35s haha
#12
#13
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.
And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.
Aaron
And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.
Aaron
#14
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Andy(interceptor) has 35s and 4.10s and they felt fine. His truck was pretty fast(for the 3.0 of course) and I don't know whats with you pushing for the lower gearing. 4.10s is about correct for 33s. I think someone once posted the best ratio is 4.33 or somethin like that, but they dont make that gear size.
And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.
Aaron
And yes you would notice the top speed affect. Your RPMs would be higher going 60 down the highway than if you had 4.10 gearing.
Aaron
And that's not how it was worded... I was simply commenting on your truthful claim of a lower top speed... But when I read top speed I am thinking top speed of 96 or whatever it may be... and going to 4.56 may lower it to say 86... it's not often, if at all someone will see these speeds (though 86 more often than 96). But still point being, final top speed is not usually of concern. But yes, the higher rpms doing 60-75 on the highway will be a realistic concern. And that is what I would have like to have known... with a 3.0, 4.56s & 33s, what are the RPMs at 75mph? b/c with the 4.10s I think they were ~2700+ but i dont recall now... with the 31s it's ~2500 i think
#15
#16
#17
#18
Originally Posted by sawred
Why would it cost 3x as much for 4.56's? The way i've seen gears priced are based on axle not ratio. So wouldnt a 4.10 cost the same as a 4.56? Only thing i can see you meaning is that if you swapped a 4.10 8.8 in you'd get the axle and gears whereas if you did the swap and the gears you'd be paying more for the gears and install which would already be done with the 4.10's.
4.10's (if I find a jy axle with em stock) is about 100-120
4.56's (jy axle) 100
(gears) 120
(install) 200
Thats just what I figured out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post