Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

Info Req: 4.0 SOHC, 5spd, 33x12.50, and 4.10 owners chime in!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #1  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Info Req: 4.0 SOHC, 5spd, 33x12.50, and 4.10 owners chime in!!

Hey.

Give me your overall experience with the 01+ 4.0L combined with the 5spd manual, 33x12.50's, and 4.10 gearing. I don't really remember what 4.10's and 32's felt like and how it performed compared to my current 4.88's and 35's.

Would also like to know your engine RPM's at 70mph and 80mph.

Spit out some mileage numbers too....I know they won't be too far off from what I'm getting(which for some reason is insanely awesome. lol).


Just exploring my options.

Thanks ya'll.

Shane
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #2  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Did something happen to your truck that I missed? Like breakage?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #3  
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, New Jersey
I've got that exact setup, at 70mph I'm running near 2500rpm. I can still turn and burn the tires with no problem, and I love the grip of the 12.5" tires. I've noticed since switching over from 10.5" tires that I've lost 1mpg, I'm now averaging about 19.5mpg.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #4  
rangerboy101's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,187
Likes: 3
From: Winchester, Va
Nooooo! Shane if you're thinking of going down to 33's DONT DO IT!
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #5  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Originally Posted by winks
I've got that exact setup, at 70mph I'm running near 2500rpm. I can still turn and burn the tires with no problem, and I love the grip of the 12.5" tires. I've noticed since switching over from 10.5" tires that I've lost 1mpg, I'm now averaging about 19.5mpg.
Yeah....I'm right about 2500 at 70 as well...but the math isn't making sense! lol. At 80 i'm at 3,000, 75 around 2800 or so.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #6  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
I love my set up.

I have 295/75/16's which is a 33.25x11.75.

I think my 4.10's do a great job with the meats. I average 17.5 mpg which is 75% city and 25% highway.

I have no problems with mine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #7  
Jimmeh's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 1
From: Columbia Falls, MT
Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
Yeah....I'm right about 2500 at 70 as well...but the math isn't making sense! lol. At 80 i'm at 3,000, 75 around 2800 or so.
That's making sense to me. What's the confusion?

If you're moving down to 33's, does this mean the BL is coming off too?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #8  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
My math is telling me 33's and 4.56 is VERY close to 35's and 4.88 in overall gearing/drivability. Geared slightly lower than my stock off the showroom floor 4.10 and 30.5's(approx 4%). Just kinda confused.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #9  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
are u calculating for speedometer accuracy? like when I'm going 55 im actually goin about 61. And consequently my mpg is better also.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #10  
Smakes's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: nowhere
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
Did something happen to your truck that I missed? Like breakage?
lets put it this way, all that work he did to make it a twin stick, its not a twinstick currently lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #11  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
I think the Superlift and 33's would be a sweet look.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #12  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Yes via scangaugeII set at either -4% or +4%. I don't remember at this time but it is accurate as confirmed by the LEO's radar gun and the 'mile post check'. I'd check but I'm too lazy to take the battery out of the Subaru and put in the Ranger.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #13  
boomer27127's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: washington
Originally Posted by Lord Of War
I think the Superlift and 33's would be a sweet look.
there's a guy that runs around here with a superlift and 33's it doesn't look bad but being double lifted and on 35's looks soo much better. its just not as practical.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #14  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
Originally Posted by boomer27127
there's a guy that runs around here with a superlift and 33's it doesn't look bad but being double lifted and on 35's looks soo much better. its just not as practical.
You are right.

Shane's truck is just plain sick.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #15  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Originally Posted by Lord Of War
Originally Posted by boomer27127
there's a guy that runs around here with a superlift and 33's it doesn't look bad but being double lifted and on 35's looks soo much better. its just not as practical.
You are right.

Shane's truck is just plain sick.

:-)
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #16  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
Plus with all the work and time that you have put in your ride it would'nt make much sense to go "backwards".
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #17  
FordTough2007's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Auburn,ME/Selinsgrove,PA
shane you better not be deliftifying your truck. its so sick. dont make me come clear across the country.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009
  #18  
t5cents's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 1
From: Eureka, CA
Originally Posted by winks
I've got that exact setup, at 70mph I'm running near 2500rpm. I can still turn and burn the tires with no problem, and I love the grip of the 12.5" tires. I've noticed since switching over from 10.5" tires that I've lost 1mpg, I'm now averaging about 19.5mpg.
damn with my 3.0 5speed with 3.73 and 31's...flowmaster, and a knn drop in i average about 13-14 mpg with all city....about 200-220 miles to a tank...that sucks....why do u guys get so much better mileage..if i were to get 300 out of my tank that would only be about 18mpg...wow
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2009
  #19  
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, New Jersey
Originally Posted by t5cents
damn with my 3.0 5speed with 3.73 and 31's...flowmaster, and a knn drop in i average about 13-14 mpg with all city....about 200-220 miles to a tank...that sucks....why do u guys get so much better mileage..if i were to get 300 out of my tank that would only be about 18mpg...wow
Most of my driving is on county roads and highways, and it's about 40 miles one way to work. With only about 5 miles of stop and go traffic in there, my mpg stays pretty good.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009
  #20  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
3.73's with 31s ... theres the problem ... get some 4 10s
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009
  #21  
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2
From: South Detroit.
t5 cents, shane has a 4.0L. you 3.0L has to work a lilttle hard to turn those tires.

3:73s and 31's are a factory option. it can't be that bad for milage.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009
  #22  
gts007's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: 559, CA
Im running 33's/4.10s but have the OHV. I'm at like 2700 @ 70.

I don't think this combo is that great power wise. I had these gears back when I had 31's and THAT was killer. Guess I'm spoiled but 4.10 and 33's is not ideal IMO even on the 4.0. MPG wise, this is okay I guess, on pure freeway I'm getting 17-17.5mpg and that's with 11 year old O2 sensors. (but I did clean out my TB and that upped my MPG). Hoping to see 18-19 freeway and 15 city with new O2 sensors.

4.56 is in my future for sure. There was a guy on here who was talking about how he got better MPG with 4.56 / 33's than he did with 4.10 / 33's....
 

Last edited by gts007; Oct 1, 2009 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009
  #23  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
sell me your sun visor haha..

for real though your truck is one of my favoites man..
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009
  #24  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Originally Posted by gts007
Im running 33's/4.10s but have the OHV. I'm at like 2700 @ 70.

I don't think this combo is that great power wise. I had these gears back when I had 31's and THAT was killer. Guess I'm spoiled but 4.10 and 33's is not ideal IMO even on the 4.0. MPG wise, this is okay I guess, on pure freeway I'm getting 17-17.5mpg and that's with 11 year old O2 sensors. (but I did clean out my TB and that upped my MPG). Hoping to see 18-19 freeway and 15 city with new O2 sensors.

4.56 is in my future for sure. There was a guy on here who was talking about how he got better MPG with 4.56 / 33's than he did with 4.10 / 33's....
I'm getting better mileage with 4.88 and 35 compared to 4.10 and 32. Even though my rpms are significantly higher....got the engine where it was making some power to keep it moving with less throttle. Looooove it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009
  #25  
Hanks Rangers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 821
Likes: 2
From: Sandpoint, ID
i get around 16 mpg with 285/75/16 and 4.10's but its an auto. though it feels peppy-er with the bfg a/t's than it did with the goodyear mtr's and i get better mileage too. i got roughly 13mpg last weekend towing a jayco pop up camper with the od off
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCWHITENER
Drivetrain Tech
1
Apr 18, 2011 07:13 AM
down4glamis
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
14
Aug 28, 2009 03:19 PM
Fx4wannabe01
General Technical & Electrical
8
Aug 11, 2009 11:46 AM
Fx4wannabe01
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
12
Jul 12, 2009 04:02 PM
Fx4wannabe01
Drivetrain Tech
31
May 26, 2008 09:17 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM.