Different clutch
#1
Different clutch
I have a 1998 2.5L standard. I did an engine swap about 10 years ago and they also replaced the clutch. A few years later I took it in to replace the clutch once again.. The mechanic said the new clutch did not fit because the engine was different than the original. He got the correct one which was considerably more expensive. Now I need to replace it again and I'm trying to determine which one to order before I drop the tranny. Any thoughts? The clutch is self-adjusting.
Last edited by Bonkshizzle; 06-19-2016 at 04:00 PM.
#2
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Welcome to the forum
Clutch kit for 1998 2.5l shows that it also fits 1995 to 2011 2.3l or 2.5l engine model Rangers
So what year engine did you swap in?
Lima 2.5l engine was only made/used from 1998 to 2001, so 3 years
And could the mismatch be the Master cylinder hook up to the slave?
The type of connector, Quick Release, did change.
But if you get/change Master/reservoir at the same time it shouldn't be an issue, they run about $40-$50
These are different for 1995-1997(2.3l engine) and 1998-2005, according to part numbers
Clutch kit for 1998 2.5l shows that it also fits 1995 to 2011 2.3l or 2.5l engine model Rangers
So what year engine did you swap in?
Lima 2.5l engine was only made/used from 1998 to 2001, so 3 years
And could the mismatch be the Master cylinder hook up to the slave?
The type of connector, Quick Release, did change.
But if you get/change Master/reservoir at the same time it shouldn't be an issue, they run about $40-$50
These are different for 1995-1997(2.3l engine) and 1998-2005, according to part numbers
Last edited by RonD; 06-20-2016 at 10:13 AM.
#3
All Ranger clutches are self-adjusting in that the hydraulic 'linkage' takes up any slack developed by clutch wear.
If you order the 'expensive' clutch and the 'less expensive' clutch, with the option to return the one that does not fit, you should be set for a replacement affair.
As Ron sez, the clutches are the same for the 2.3/2.5, and I think the flywheels are the same also. The 2.3 had a turbo clutch available for the T-bird and Mustang SVO that cost a pile more than the 'standard' clutch. The turbo would eat the standard clutch, but both would fit to the flywheel, and function more or less.
If you kept the paperwork for the last job, the parts should be listed, or you might check with that shop.
tom
If you order the 'expensive' clutch and the 'less expensive' clutch, with the option to return the one that does not fit, you should be set for a replacement affair.
As Ron sez, the clutches are the same for the 2.3/2.5, and I think the flywheels are the same also. The 2.3 had a turbo clutch available for the T-bird and Mustang SVO that cost a pile more than the 'standard' clutch. The turbo would eat the standard clutch, but both would fit to the flywheel, and function more or less.
If you kept the paperwork for the last job, the parts should be listed, or you might check with that shop.
tom
#4
#5
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
You had a 2.5l Lima engine, they were only made for 3 years, so all the same.
That is assuming the new engine is a 2.5l lima
The 2.3l Lima was used in Rangers from 1989 to 1997, 2.5l just had a different crank and connecting rods to get a longer stroke, giving it .2l more displacement.
But same block, pistons, and pretty much everything else.
I know of no way to ID what year engine you may have
That is assuming the new engine is a 2.5l lima
The 2.3l Lima was used in Rangers from 1989 to 1997, 2.5l just had a different crank and connecting rods to get a longer stroke, giving it .2l more displacement.
But same block, pistons, and pretty much everything else.
I know of no way to ID what year engine you may have
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ttb_addict94
Drivetrain Tech
0
06-05-2014 05:43 PM
DJDev
Drivetrain Tech
2
10-28-2012 08:41 PM