Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

CHevy springs... With a twist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #1  
bigdavesohc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Eastland, Texas
CHevy springs... With a twist

I'm thinking of doing the Chevy spring swap, and I know what springs to get (1/2 ton 2wd). However, what about 3/4 to springs? I am not worried about a stiff ride or anything, just a payload increase (I know it won't be as much as a 3/4 ton, though). I just wanted to pull a trailer for a local parade, and the trailer alone weighs about 3,000lbs. I really don't want to sag real low, it would be kinda embarrassing.

Would it work? Is it feasable?
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #2  
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 2
From: Valrico, Fl 33594
I don't know any of the numbers but I think you would probably run into a problem with the width of the spring vs your perches and hangers. I don't know any numbers but I doubt it would be a direct bolt on. But anything can be done with enough money, time, and knowledge
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #3  
r0ng5's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,575
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
read this:

EDIT: Wrong article.

I'm trying to find the one where Bob (rwenzing) has said that even though you upgraded the springs, your frame, engine, etc is all rated for the original towing capacity. Therefore, you might not *sag* like before, but you are putting strain on everything else still.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #4  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Here is my Ranger with 2WD Chevy springs and a scaled 2400 pounds in the bed, roughly double the rated payload.



Even though it was still an inch from contacting the bumpstops, it drove like it was overloaded, too. I do not recommend hauling this much in a Ranger.

As far as the car w/trailer idea, that sounds like you would be at or over the rated trailer capacity of the truck. However, the correct tongue weight is 10% of the trailer weight. Properly distributed, the tongue weight of the trailer/car combination should only be about 500~600 pounds at the hitch, way less of a load on the rear axle than what I'm showing in the photo above.

The short answer is that I think the 2WD C1500 springs would be more than adequate for the trailer.

You might be able to get away without using them in a parade but that combination should also have a load distributing hitch and trailer brakes behind a Ranger.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #5  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
my procomp lift springs are for 88-98 1/2, 3/4 and 1 ton chevy trucks.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #6  
bigdavesohc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Eastland, Texas
I'm really just trying to get rid of the sag, not really to overload. Thanks far all your help!
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006
  #7  
rangererv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn Michigan
i just pulled my boat around with the 1/2 ton chevy springs...im loading the pic up, but it didnt sag much if any...the rear was still a 1/2 in higher then the front of my truck
boat prob weighes 2k or so ( full tank of gas in boat and truck)
Name:  Picture045Medium.jpg
Views: 121
Size:  53.5 KB
Name:  Picture047Medium.jpg
Views: 116
Size:  50.6 KB
Name:  Picture048Medium.jpg
Views: 135
Size:  46.6 KB
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #8  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by bigdavesohc
I'm really just trying to get rid of the sag, not really to overload. Thanks far all your help!
Used with the stock blocks, a decent set of C1500/2WD springs will lift the rear of the truck roughly 2" and make it drop much less under load. I assume that is what you mean by sag.

The fore/aft position of the car on the trailer will greatly affect the tongue weight and that will change how much the rear of your truck drops with the trailer. Actually, you should be able to run your stock Ranger 4x4 springs without a lot of drop if you have the tongue weight right.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #9  
zainyD's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
If you really want extra payload just get the 4wd springs which have one more leaf than the 2wd leafs do.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #10  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by zainyD
If you really want extra payload just get the 4wd springs which have one more leaf than the 2wd leafs do.
He has a 4x4.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #11  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by rwenzing
He has a 4x4.
ZainyD is refering to the Chevy 4wd springs not the ranger ones i think
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #12  
HAZZARDJOHN's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming MN
I new a guy that had an old S10 that was owned by a spring company as a delivery truck, thye put custom made 3/4 ton springs in there and it had the worse ride I have ever seen! Un less you had weight in the bed it would jump in the air with every small bump you hit.

~HJ
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #13  
bigdavesohc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Eastland, Texas
Originally Posted by rwenzing
Used with the stock blocks, a decent set of C1500/2WD springs will lift the rear of the truck roughly 2" and make it drop much less under load. I assume that is what you mean by sag.

I thought you had to take the blocks out. I don't have a lift on my truck, it has the stock suspension.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #14  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by bigdavesohc
I thought you had to take the blocks out. I don't have a lift on my truck, it has the stock suspension.
Mine still has its factory 4x4 blocks. If you pull the blocks, then your stock shocks will be too long.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006
  #15  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
i took my blocks out but what bob is saying is you need the blocks for the bump stop. you will need to extend the bump stop on the frame or do something to reduce the chance of the shocks bottoming out.

i dont really care and I am just taking that chance.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bryanjints
Suspension Tech
12
Feb 23, 2007 06:38 PM
blackbetty
Suspension Tech
8
Nov 29, 2006 09:17 PM
zabeard
Suspension Tech
13
May 23, 2006 08:39 PM
zabeard
General Ford Ranger Discussion
30
May 23, 2006 05:11 AM
V8 Level II
Suspension Tech
34
Apr 30, 2006 10:00 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.