OLD - Engine & Drivetrain Ford Ranger engine and drivetrain parts, i.e. radiators, driveshafts, knuckles, brakes.

Want to Buy: F7 [7.5 4.10 Limited Slip] rear end. North GA.

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2020
  #1  
Moist's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 139
Likes: 11
From: N/A
F7 [7.5 4.10 Limited Slip] rear end. North GA.

Looking for a complete F7 [7.5 4.10 Limited Slip/Posi Traction] rear end. If the brakes are missing thats fine just more excuse to do a disc conversion before I swap it.Willing to travel a little if the price is right but I don't wanna even imagine what shipping one would cost.
 
Old Oct 3, 2020
  #2  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Check car-part.com

Look for "rear axle assembly"
Wrecking yards call them "locking" differentials when they are limited slip(L/S)

7.5" or 8.8" are interchangeable, just FYI, just bolt in no changes needed
8.8" is code R7 for L/S
And there were more 8.8" with L/S, as most 4x4 Rangers had L/S rear axles
 
Old Oct 4, 2020
  #3  
Moist's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 139
Likes: 11
From: N/A
Yeah but I don't think a 2.3 would like a 8.8 very much.
 
Old Oct 4, 2020
  #4  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
????

It wouldn't care at all, just FYI
7.5" was used because its cheaper, no other reason
Same size axles and tubes as 8.8"
Just the cost new is less so Ford can build it a little cheaper

But for your purpose, looking for a 4.10 L/S rear differential, either will do, no drawback using a 7.5" or 8.8"
 
Old Oct 5, 2020
  #5  
Moist's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 139
Likes: 11
From: N/A
Really? I thought 8.8 required more power and would make a smaller engine struggle?
 
Old Oct 5, 2020
  #6  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Nope, it can handle more power/torque, but doesn't require it

 
Old Oct 14, 2020
  #7  
Moist's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 139
Likes: 11
From: N/A
Do you have any references? That just doesn't sit right with me? Its bigger and therefore takes more power to move.
 
Old Oct 14, 2020
  #8  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
I think you are referencing the weight only of the differential and housing, and yes, there would be a few more pounds added to the total weight
But as far as the torque/power needed to spin a 7.5" and 8.8", with the same ratio, there shouldn't any noticeable difference
I don't think there has even been a study on that

The leverage for the pinion to move the 7.5" ring gear and the 8.8" ring gear should be the same, maybe a little less for the 8.8" because its farther away from the center(axles) so has better leverage to move them, so that may compensate for the weight difference
 
Old Oct 16, 2020
  #9  
Moist's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 139
Likes: 11
From: N/A
No I'm not concerned at all with weight it just makes sense to me that its a larger gear and needs more torque from the engine to get it turning.
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jbs007
Drivetrain Tech
5
Sep 23, 2020 02:17 PM
Bobburt444
Drivetrain Tech
1
May 20, 2011 11:23 PM
Anarchy11C
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
7
Sep 21, 2010 12:18 PM
vindex1963
Drivetrain Tech
8
Mar 3, 2010 08:28 PM
Prerunner-Ranger
Drivetrain Tech
52
Apr 16, 2009 11:38 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 PM.