Project Logs For detailed builds specific to the Ford Ranger, one thread per vehicle please.

Bob's swap project: Level II meets 5.0L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2007
  #301  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Rangerboy03lvl2
finished pics?!?!
It's driveable but not finished yet. Need to refit the bumper, grill, front skid plate, etc. after I get completely done with the cooling system fiasco.

As far as the engine bay goes, these pictures have already been posted and pretty much tell the story. The battery and hood have been installed since.





 

Last edited by V8 Level II; Jan 30, 2008 at 03:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007
  #302  
Mark98xlt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 3
From: Parma Ohio
looks good bob, I still have those 3.55 gears if you want them.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007
  #303  
tmsoko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 2
From: Plymouth, MI
[QUOTE=rwenzing]No, I haven't weighed it. 4500 was just a guesstimate.
[QUOTE]

Your guess will be pretty darn close! I was 4520lbs on the certified scales at work. That was me in it (~150lbs at the time), fiberglass hard top on the step side bed, and 12" sub / 5 channel amp. All else was stock ranger or explorer v8.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2007
  #304  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
looks killer, Only thing i dont like about mine is that it doesnt look as good in a bL'd truck cause it looks like i have no motor at eye level lol.. oh well more room for a giant blower right?...pfff
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007
  #305  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by INT3RC3PTOR
let me know what you findings are on trying to keep the Ranger module in place and just use the explorer one for VSS. I'd be interested in doing that if you find a way to make it work.
This is not looking good.

I received the Explorer 4WABS/VSS Module today and set it up for the correct 677 tire revs/mile. I thought things were going well until I fired it up and tried it. I found out that I can get the speedometer to work OR I can get the 4WABS to work. If I wire them both at the same time, the ABS seems happy but the speedometer stays at zero.

This is what I was thinking could happen and hoping it would not. Apparently, the signal from the rear axle sensor can't quite supply the two modules at once.

I'm going to pull the axle sensor tomorrow and clean it just for grins. Probably won't help.

Then I'll be off to plan B but I don't know what that is yet....
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2007
  #306  
Rangerboy03lvl2's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Colorado, Lone Tree
good luck bob!
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2007
  #307  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
damn, well I'm going to be tackling this on monday and tues. and I think i'm just going to swap the full system besides the G-meter thing cause i dont care about abs. i just want my speedo to read and my trans to be at optimal.

i hope you get things strait!
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007
  #308  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Speedometer is operational again!

I finally got the speedometer and ABS to cooperate and work at the same time. The winning combination is the 03 Ranger factory 4WABS module and a GEM out of a 2001 2.5L Ranger. In my truck, the 01 GEM handles only the VSS signal conversion and tire diameter adjustment while the factory 03 GEM continues to perform all of its intended functions. The original 03 4WABS is unaffected.

This was mocked up in the garage with the rear axle on stands and a bunch of jumpers under the hood, so I haven't been able to drive it yet with the speedo working. I now need to move all the VSS wiring to the interior instead of under the hood - The GEM is not weatherproof like the Explorer 4WABS Module that I originally planned to use.

Just to make things more interesting, one of my Eldorado rear calipers decided to spring a leak for some unknown reason. I think my Ford's immune system may be rejecting the transplanted GM parts....
 

Last edited by V8 Level II; Sep 18, 2007 at 10:21 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007
  #309  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
bob i dont want to know how you came up with that combination of parts! lol

glad you got it figured out tho
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007
  #310  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by zabeard
bob i dont want to know how you came up with that combination of parts!
I'm going to tell you anyway!

I was studying the wiring manuals and I found out that Ford did something very similar on the early 2001MY 4-cylinders. These trucks are a unique combination of carry-over 2.5L's from 2000, the new 01+ 4WABS, no PATS. The raw vehicle speed pulse comes from the rear axle ABS sensor and is corrected in the GEM as is done in 98~00 RABS trucks. [Later in 01, the 4-cylinder Ranger switched over to the 2.3L DOHC version which has the raw speed signal taken from the transmission output shaft sensor and corrected in the PCM like the V6's.]

The important thing to me is that the 2001 2.5's run both the 4WABS Module and the GEM paralleled off the single rear axle ABS sensor - that's why I knew it should work on mine.
 

Last edited by V8 Level II; Sep 18, 2007 at 11:05 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007
  #311  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
Bob you are too good, glad everything is worked out. Cant wait to see the finished pics.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2007
  #312  
texasbullseye89's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
From: Huntsville, Tx
Originally Posted by rwenzing
I'm going to tell you anyway!

I was studying the wiring manuals and I found out that Ford did something very similar on the early 2001MY 4-cylinders. These trucks are a unique combination of carry-over 2.5L's from 2000, the new 01 4WABS with EFBD but no PATS. The raw vehicle speed pulse comes from the rear axle ABS sensor and is corrected in the GEM as is done in 98~00 RABS trucks. [Later in 01, the Ranger switched over to the 2.3L DOHC version which has the raw speed signal taken from the transmission output shaft sensor and corrected in the PCM like the V6's.]

The important thing to me is that the 2001 2.5's run both the 4WABS Module and the GEM paralleled off the single rear axle ABS sensor - that's why I knew it should work on mine.

i think my brain just popped. i feel a leaking sensation.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007
  #313  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
Bob could you possibly make up a how-to on it, or let me know where you wired things to. If that proccess is easier than swapping out the whole module i'd be interested
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007
  #314  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by INT3RC3PTOR
Bob could you possibly make up a how-to on it, or let me know where you wired things to. If that proccess is easier than swapping out the whole module i'd be interested
PM sent.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007
  #315  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Bob you are the man.....glad things are starting to come together for you and getting the truck finalized!
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007
  #316  
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, New Jersey
Originally Posted by texasbullseye89

i think my brain just popped. i feel a leaking sensation.
Haha... I feel so inferior. Good work Bob.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2007
  #317  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by rwenzing
I'm going to tell you anyway!

I was studying the wiring manuals and I found out that Ford did something very similar on the early 2001MY 4-cylinders. These trucks are a unique combination of carry-over 2.5L's from 2000, the new 01+ 4WABS, no PATS. The raw vehicle speed pulse comes from the rear axle ABS sensor and is corrected in the GEM as is done in 98~00 RABS trucks. [Later in 01, the 4-cylinder Ranger switched over to the 2.3L DOHC version which has the raw speed signal taken from the transmission output shaft sensor and corrected in the PCM like the V6's.]

The important thing to me is that the 2001 2.5's run both the 4WABS Module and the GEM paralleled off the single rear axle ABS sensor - that's why I knew it should work on mine.
i think 99% of people would have never noticed that.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007
  #318  
klc317's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
How about posting up a video if you get time? I'd love to see and hear it running.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007
  #319  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by klc317
How about posting up a video if you get time? I'd love to see and hear it running.
Soon but it's undriveable right now. I'm repairing a leaky caliper seal and then I'll move on to permanently relocating the VSS wiring to the interior.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #320  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Ok, it's on the road again.

The caliper is fixed and I moved the VSS wiring to the interior and got the 2nd GEM mounted under the right kick panel where the 4x4 module would be on electric shift Rangers. I also relocated the trans cooler higher up. It was functional as-is but looked like it could get the hoses kinked if I ever folded up the imitation front skid plate.

So, FINALLY, the truck has a speedometer that works and it still has the factory ABS/EBFD that I wanted to retain. Along with the speedometer, the VSS allows other niceties like cruise control, SSV and the rest of the trip computer calculations.

Speaking of which, I'm probably going to wrap it around a tree gawking at the instantaneous fuel economy readout. Cruising at 55 gives 20+ MPG but it's REAL easy to dip into single digits on accels. WOT usually runs at 3~4 MPG and I managed to dip it to 2MPG briefly by doing a gorilla stomp off the line in 2nd gear. Fun with bronto juice...
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #321  
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, New Jersey
Haha, glad to hear its on the road again... please don't wrap it around a tree.

How do you like the new power?
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #322  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
sweet Bob! i wanna see this thing in person!
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #323  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Bob congrats on finally getting it done. Now you know we need a whole slew of pictures!
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #324  
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 2
From: Minnesooooota
video with lots of sound.. i wanna hear what yours sounds comparred to mine. I'm guessing i'm gona be a bit more raw than you. But i dont have my headers yet... maybe spring
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007
  #325  
V8 Level II's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Mine's actually very quiet. It has a 4 cats, a giant 22 x 11 x 6 DI/DO Magnaflow and duals out to the rear bumper. Just a bit of V8 rumble at idle and it makes a little more noise at WOT. No drone in the cab anymore after the tailpipes went on.

I'll have to see if I can come up with a way to record it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 AM.